2026 NPPES data Hematology & Oncology Physician NPI 1487917522 MD
Verify on CMS →

Elizabeth Kander, MD

Hematology & Oncology Physician in Columbus, Ohio.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 11,215 in Hematology & Oncology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
742
Medicare Part D claims · 177 beneficiaries · Hematology & Oncology Physician avg: 847
Generic prescribing
88%
generic claims · 12% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
82.6/100
▼ 1 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$91.43
2 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Elizabeth Kander, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 82.6/100 - below the 83.1 national average - and filed 742 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

82.6/100
MIPS score · -1 vs avg
742
Part D claims, 2023
88%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Elizabeth Kander, MD's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

83 39th percentile higher than 39% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Elizabeth Kander, MD sits

This provider among hematology & oncology physician peers

Across the 4,233 hematology & oncology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Elizabeth Kander, MD writes more Part D claims than 50% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 38% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Elizabeth Kander, MD-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one hematology & oncology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Elizabeth Kander, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Elizabeth Kander, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Elizabeth Kander, MD?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/22/2012

NPI 1487917522

Primary specialty

Hematology & Oncology Physician

Mid-sized

11,215 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

742 12% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 847

MIPS final score

82.6/100 0.5 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Ohio

How Hematology & Oncology Physician compares to other specialties among Ohio providers

Ohio providers
Case Manager/Care Coordinator - 10.9%Case Manager/Care Coordinator10.9%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 4.7%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program4.7%Licensed Practical Nurse - 4%Licensed Practical Nurse4%Addiction (Substance Use Disorder) Counselor - 3.5%Addiction (Substance Use Disorder) Counselor3.5%Registered Nurse - 3.4%Registered Nurse3.4%Pharmacist - 3.4%Pharmacist3.4%Hematology & Oncology Physician - 0.1%Hematology & Oncology Physician0.1%
Largest specialties in Ohio (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Elizabeth Kander, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Hematology & Oncology Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
82.6/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Hematology & Oncology Physician) - 82.6/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%82.6%
MIPS final score (Hematology & Oncology Physician) - 82.6/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Elizabeth Kander, MD appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Hematology & Oncology Physician provider holding MD credentials at 810 JASONWAY AVE STE A, Columbus, OH, 43214, with a listed phone of (614) 442-3130. NPI 1487917522 was issued on 06/22/2012.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 742 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 177 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $1.0 million in drug spend, split 12% brand-name and 88% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 8.4%. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 82.6/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 81.4, Cost 55.4), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Hematology & Oncology Physician is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 11,215 enrolled providers across 54 states and an average of 847 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

810 JASONWAY AVE STE A
Columbus, OH 43214

Provider Details

NPI 1487917522
Specialty Hematology & Oncology Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Female
NPI Issued 06/22/2012

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

82.5642
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
81.4223
Quality
55.3563
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Elizabeth Kander, MD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Columbus Oncology Associates Inc
Columbus, OH

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Elizabeth Kander, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$91

Largest payer

Tempus AI, Inc

Most common payment type

Education

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - Ohio OMB 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~48K Ohio medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Elizabeth Kander, MD. To verify Elizabeth Kander, MD's current license status, search the OMB public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

158
Total board actions, Ohio 2023
Across 154 cases
3.29
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Ohio statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
56 cases

OMB publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Ohio disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Elizabeth Kander, MD - brand share 12.0%
Hematology & Oncology Physician average

12% brand-name claims vs 88% generic, on 742 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

742
Total Claims
$1.0M
Total Drug Cost
177
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
1,348
Total Day Supply
37,161
Brand vs Generic
12% brand / 88% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$736K
Generic Drug Cost
$300K
Opioid Claims
62 (8.4% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
19

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
73.6 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.74
Gender Split
81% female / 19% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Elizabeth Kander, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Anastrozole
178
Letrozole
36
Prochlorperazine Maleate
32
Oxycodone Hcl
28
Tamoxifen Citrate
28
Hydroxyurea
25
Dexamethasone
24
Prednisone
23
Lenalidomide
20
Imatinib Mesylate
19

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Hematology & Oncology Physician Overview

How Elizabeth Kander, MD fits within the Hematology & Oncology Physician landscape nationally.

11,215
Hematology & Oncology Physician Providers in US
54
States with Hematology & Oncology Physician
847
Avg Claims per Provider

Elizabeth Kander, MD's 742 claims are below the specialty average of 847.

Nearby Hematology & Oncology Physician Providers in Ohio

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Ohio, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Kander.

Compare Hematology & Oncology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Ohio medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Hematology & Oncology Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Elizabeth Kander, MD's specialty?
Elizabeth Kander, MD specializes in Hematology & Oncology Physician and practices in Columbus, Ohio. Credentials: MD.
How much does Elizabeth Kander, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Elizabeth Kander, MD wrote 742 Medicare Part D claims totaling $1.0M in drug costs for 177 beneficiaries.
What is Elizabeth Kander, MD's Medicare quality score?
Elizabeth Kander, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 82.6/100 (Quality: 81.4, Cost: 55.4). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Elizabeth Kander, MD located?
Elizabeth Kander, MD is located at 810 JASONWAY AVE STE A, Columbus, OH, 43214. Phone: (614) 442-3130.
What is Elizabeth Kander, MD's NPI number?
Elizabeth Kander, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1487917522, issued on 06/22/2012.
Does Elizabeth Kander, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Elizabeth Kander, MD's prescribing is 12% brand-name and 88% generic drugs by claim count, with $736K in brand drug costs.
Does Elizabeth Kander, MD prescribe opioids?
Yes, Elizabeth Kander, MD had 62 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 8.4%.
How many Hematology & Oncology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 11,215 Hematology & Oncology Physician providers across 54 states in the US. The average Hematology & Oncology Physician provider writes 847 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Elizabeth Kander, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Elizabeth Kander, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Anastrozole, Letrozole, Prochlorperazine Maleate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Elizabeth Kander, MD accept Medicare?
Elizabeth Kander, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 742 Part D claims and 177 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Elizabeth Kander, MD's credentials?
Elizabeth Kander, MD's NPI is 1487917522 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.