PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Gerontology Nurse Practitioner NPI 1417331083
Verify on CMS →

Elizabeth Larson

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner in Fort Myers, Florida.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 10,056 in Gerontology Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
17
Medicare Part D claims · Gerontology Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
MIPS score
55.2/100
▼ 28 pts below national avg 83.5 · Mid-tier
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Elizabeth Larson reported a CMS MIPS final score of 55.2/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 17 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

55.2/100
MIPS score · -28 vs avg
17
Part D claims, 2024
≥5th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Elizabeth Larson

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1417331083), first enumerated 07/14/2015.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 17 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 55.2/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    Florida statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Elizabeth Larson's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: FLDOH annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1417331083 · Gerontology Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-LOW · RX-TRACE · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1417331083
  • ENUM-MID 2015
  • TAX-MID 10K Gerontology Nurse
  • MIPS-LOW 55.2/100
  • RX-TRACE 17
  • BOOK-LIGHT 1,008 in Florida
  • PHOTO-FINISH Veronique Lynch, DNP… · ±0.1

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Elizabeth Larson's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

55 ≥ 5th percentile 5% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). This entry sits in this band. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Elizabeth Larson sits

This provider among gerontology nurse practitioner peers

Across the 1,256 gerontology nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Elizabeth Larson writes more Part D claims than 2% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 4% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100023.146.269.392.4Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Elizabeth Larson, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 4
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one gerontology nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Elizabeth Larson. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Elizabeth Larson?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/14/2015

NPI 1417331083

Primary specialty

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

10,056 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

17 99% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,350

MIPS final score

55.2/100 28.3 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Florida

How Gerontology Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Florida providers

Florida providers
Behavior Technician16.3%Mental Health Counselor4.8%Family Nurse Practitioner4.5%Pharmacist4.1%Student in an Organized Heal…4.1%Physical Therapist3%Gerontology Nurse Practition…0.2%
Largest specialties in Florida (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Elizabeth Larson's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Gerontology Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
55.2/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%55.2%
MIPS final score (Gerontology Nurse Practitioner) - 55.2/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

9025 POMELO RD W
Fort Myers, FL 33967
(239) 265-3391

Provider Details

NPI 1417331083
Specialty Gerontology Nurse Practitioner
Gender Female
NPI Issued 07/14/2015

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

55.2038
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
15.3264
Quality
18.6863
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

License & disciplinary context - Florida FLDOH 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~75K Florida medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Elizabeth Larson. To verify Elizabeth Larson's current license status, search the FLDOH public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

480
Total board actions, Florida 2023
Across 467 cases
6.40
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Florida statewide rate
monetary fine
Most common action type
138 cases

FLDOH publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Florida disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

17
Total Claims
$3K
Total Drug Cost
N/A
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
17.1
Total Day Supply
450
Generic Drug Cost
$67

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
77.4 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.25
More Gerontology Nurse Practitioner in FL → All providers in Florida → Compare specialties →

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Elizabeth Larson fits within the Gerontology Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

10,056
Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
54
States with Gerontology Nurse Practitioner
1,350
Avg Claims per Provider

Elizabeth Larson's 17 claims are below the specialty average of 1,350.

Nationwide Gerontology Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Larson, both outside Florida so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (55.2 here).

Veronique Lynch 55.1 NJ Jennifer Uebele 55 NC Qing Xu 54.5 CO Charla Johansen 54.5 AZ

Same NPPES enumeration year (2015)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Bethann Nevius Bardstown, KY Oksana Nizheborsky San Diego, CA Jean Marie Tuete Smyrna, DE Travis Konzelman Augusta, GA

Nearby Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Providers in Florida

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Florida, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Larson.

One of 1,008 Gerontology Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Florida, 5 are shown here.

Gretchen Abbott
APRN
Davenport, FL
Ricardo Acevedo
Miami, FL
Stephanie Adams
AGNP-C
Tampa, FL
Sonia Adamson
APRN
Tampa, FL
Marlene Adesca
ARNP
Lauderhill, FL

Compare Gerontology Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Elizabeth Larson's specialty? ▼
Elizabeth Larson specializes in Gerontology Nurse Practitioner and practices in Fort Myers, Florida.
How much does Elizabeth Larson prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Elizabeth Larson wrote 17 Medicare Part D claims totaling $3K in drug costs for N/A beneficiaries.
What is Elizabeth Larson's Medicare quality score? ▼
Elizabeth Larson has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 55.2/100 (Quality: 15.3, Cost: 18.7). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Elizabeth Larson located? ▼
Elizabeth Larson is located at 9025 POMELO RD W, Fort Myers, FL, 33967. Phone: (239) 265-3391.
What is Elizabeth Larson's NPI number? ▼
Elizabeth Larson's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1417331083, issued on 07/14/2015.
How many Gerontology Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 10,056 Gerontology Nurse Practitioner providers across 54 states in the US. The average Gerontology Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,350 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Elizabeth Larson accept Medicare? ▼
Elizabeth Larson appears in CMS Medicare data with 17 Part D claims and N/A Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Elizabeth Larson's credentials? ▼
Elizabeth Larson's NPI is 1417331083. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.