2026 NPPES data Gerontology Nurse Practitioner NPI 1427435478 NP
Verify on CMS →

Elizabeth Schack, NP

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner in New York, New York.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 9,706 in Gerontology Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
627
Medicare Part D claims · 81 beneficiaries · Gerontology Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
83%
generic claims · 17% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
100/100
▲ 17 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Elizabeth Schack, NP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 100/100 - above the 83.1 national average - and filed 627 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

100/100
MIPS score · +17 vs avg
627
Part D claims, 2023
83%
generic prescribing

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Elizabeth Schack, NP's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

100 Top 7% higher than 93% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Elizabeth Schack, NP sits

This provider among gerontology nurse practitioner peers

Across the 1,301 gerontology nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Elizabeth Schack, NP writes more Part D claims than 58% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 92% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Elizabeth Schack, NP-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one gerontology nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Elizabeth Schack, NP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Elizabeth Schack, NP?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 04/29/2015

NPI 1427435478

Primary specialty

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

9,706 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

627 51% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,283

MIPS final score

100/100 16.9 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in New York

How Gerontology Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among New York providers

New York providers
Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 7.8%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program7.8%Registered Nurse - 5.2%Registered Nurse5.2%Clinical Social Worker - 4.9%Clinical Social Worker4.9%Social Worker - 4.5%Social Worker4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist - 4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist4.5%Licensed Practical Nurse - 4.3%Licensed Practical Nurse4.3%Gerontology Nurse Practitioner - 0.1%Gerontology Nurse Practitioner0.1%
Largest specialties in New York (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Elizabeth Schack, NP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Gerontology Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
100/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Gerontology Nurse Practitioner) - 100/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%99%
MIPS final score (Gerontology Nurse Practitioner) - 100/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Elizabeth Schack, NP appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Gerontology Nurse Practitioner provider holding NP credentials at 525 E 68TH ST, New York, NY, 10065, with a listed phone of (212) 746-1729. NPI 1427435478 was issued on 04/29/2015.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 627 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 81 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $41K in drug spend, split 17% brand-name and 83% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 57.9%. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 100/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 86.8), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 9,706 enrolled providers across 54 states and an average of 1,283 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

525 E 68TH ST
New York, NY 10065

Provider Details

NPI 1427435478
Specialty Gerontology Nurse Practitioner
Credentials NP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 04/29/2015

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

100
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
86.8066
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

License & disciplinary context - New York NYSBPMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~100K New York medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Elizabeth Schack, NP. To verify Elizabeth Schack, NP's current license status, search the NYSBPMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

312
Total board actions, New York 2023
Across 302 cases
3.12
Actions per 1,000 licensees
New York statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
89 cases

NYSBPMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the New York disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Elizabeth Schack, NP - brand share 17.0%
Gerontology Nurse Practitioner average

17% brand-name claims vs 83% generic, on 627 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

627
Total Claims
$41K
Total Drug Cost
81
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
650
Total Day Supply
14,646
Brand vs Generic
17% brand / 83% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$16K
Generic Drug Cost
$25K
Opioid Claims
363 (57.9% rate)

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
72.5 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
3.88
Gender Split
53% female / 47% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Elizabeth Schack, NP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Fentanyl
101
Oxycodone Hcl
77
Hydromorphone Hcl
76
Gabapentin
32
Methylphenidate Hcl
32
Morphine Sulfate
23
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen
Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen
21
Buprenorphine
18
Pregabalin
16
Naloxone Hcl
13

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Elizabeth Schack, NP fits within the Gerontology Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

9,706
Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
54
States with Gerontology Nurse Practitioner
1,283
Avg Claims per Provider

Elizabeth Schack, NP's 627 claims are below the specialty average of 1,283.

Nearby Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Providers in New York

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in New York, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Schack.

Compare Gerontology Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the New York medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Gerontology Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Elizabeth Schack, NP's specialty?
Elizabeth Schack, NP specializes in Gerontology Nurse Practitioner and practices in New York, New York. Credentials: NP.
How much does Elizabeth Schack, NP prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Elizabeth Schack, NP wrote 627 Medicare Part D claims totaling $41K in drug costs for 81 beneficiaries.
What is Elizabeth Schack, NP's Medicare quality score?
Elizabeth Schack, NP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 100/100 (Quality: 86.8). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Elizabeth Schack, NP located?
Elizabeth Schack, NP is located at 525 E 68TH ST, New York, NY, 10065. Phone: (212) 746-1729.
What is Elizabeth Schack, NP's NPI number?
Elizabeth Schack, NP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1427435478, issued on 04/29/2015.
Does Elizabeth Schack, NP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Elizabeth Schack, NP's prescribing is 17% brand-name and 83% generic drugs by claim count, with $16K in brand drug costs.
Does Elizabeth Schack, NP prescribe opioids?
Yes, Elizabeth Schack, NP had 363 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 57.9%.
How many Gerontology Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 9,706 Gerontology Nurse Practitioner providers across 54 states in the US. The average Gerontology Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,283 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Elizabeth Schack, NP prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Elizabeth Schack, NP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Fentanyl, Oxycodone Hcl, Hydromorphone Hcl. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Elizabeth Schack, NP accept Medicare?
Elizabeth Schack, NP appears in CMS Medicare data with 627 Part D claims and 81 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Elizabeth Schack, NP's credentials?
Elizabeth Schack, NP's NPI is 1427435478 with credentials NP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.