2026 NPPES data Urology Physician NPI 1881697944 MD
Verify on CMS →

Emily Kean Puccioni, MD

Urology Physician in Omaha, Nebraska.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 13,350 in Urology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 508 beneficiaries · Urology Physician avg: 1K
MIPS score
45/100
▼ 38 pts below national avg 83.1 · Below average
Industry payments
$781.08
36 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Emily Kean Puccioni, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 45/100 - below the 83.1 national average - and filed 2,088 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

45/100
MIPS score · -38 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2023
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Emily Kean Puccioni, MD's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

45 4th percentile higher than 4% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Emily Kean Puccioni, MD sits

This provider among urology physician peers

Across the 4,623 urology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Emily Kean Puccioni, MD writes more Part D claims than 71% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 4% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Emily Kean Puccioni, MD-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 71 · MIPS quality, percentile: 4
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one urology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Emily Kean Puccioni, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Emily Kean Puccioni, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 2 hospital affiliations - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Emily Kean Puccioni, MD?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 05/23/2005

NPI 1881697944

Primary specialty

Urology Physician

Mid-sized

13,350 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

2,088 63% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,280

MIPS final score

45/100 38.1 pts vs avg

Below average band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Nebraska

How Urology Physician compares to other specialties among Nebraska providers

Nebraska providers
Personal Care Attendant - 13.7%Personal Care Attendant13.7%Adult Companion - 7.6%Adult Companion7.6%Chore Provider - 6.1%Chore Provider6.1%Mental Health Counselor - 5.6%Mental Health Counselor5.6%Home Health Aide - 4.9%Home Health Aide4.9%Behavior Technician - 4.9%Behavior Technician4.9%Urology Physician - 0.1%Urology Physician0.1%
Largest specialties in Nebraska (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Emily Kean Puccioni, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Urology Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
45/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Urology Physician) - 45/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%45%
MIPS final score (Urology Physician) - 45/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Emily Kean Puccioni, MD appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Urology Physician provider holding MD credentials at 10707 PACIFIC ST, Omaha, NE, 68114, with a listed phone of (402) 397-7989. NPI 1881697944 was issued on 05/23/2005.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 2,088 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 508 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $373K in drug spend, with an opioid prescribing rate of 1.9%. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 45/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 51.3, Cost 48.7), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Urology Physician is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 13,350 enrolled providers across 54 states and an average of 1,280 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

10707 PACIFIC ST
Omaha, NE 68114

Provider Details

NPI 1881697944
Specialty Urology Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Female
NPI Issued 05/23/2005

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

45.0174
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
51.3208
Quality
48.737
Cost
0
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Emily Kean Puccioni, MD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Adult And Pediatric Urology PC
Omaha, NE
Urology Center PC
Omaha, NE

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Emily Kean Puccioni, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$781

Largest payer

Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

2,088
Total Claims
$373K
Total Drug Cost
508
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
2,959
Total Day Supply
75,932
Generic Drug Cost
$67K
Opioid Claims
40 (1.9% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
650

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
75.3 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.20
Gender Split
100% female / 0% male
Age Distribution
<65: 32, 65-74: 204, 75-84: 206, 85+: 66

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Emily Kean Puccioni, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Myrbetriq
Mirabegron
241
Gemtesa
Vibegron
183
Nitrofurantoin
Nitrofurantoin Macrocrystal
150
Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim
Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim
143
Amitriptyline Hcl
133
Triamcinolone Acetonide
125
Estradiol
122
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro
Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst
114
Cephalexin
106
Trospium Chloride
82

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Urology Physician Overview

How Emily Kean Puccioni, MD fits within the Urology Physician landscape nationally.

13,350
Urology Physician Providers in US
54
States with Urology Physician
1,280
Avg Claims per Provider

Emily Kean Puccioni, MD's 2,088 claims are above the specialty average of 1,280.

Nearby Urology Physician Providers in Nebraska

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Nebraska, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Kean Puccioni.

Compare Urology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Nebraska medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Urology Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Emily Kean Puccioni, MD's specialty?
Emily Kean Puccioni, MD specializes in Urology Physician and practices in Omaha, Nebraska. Credentials: MD.
How much does Emily Kean Puccioni, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Emily Kean Puccioni, MD wrote 2,088 Medicare Part D claims totaling $373K in drug costs for 508 beneficiaries.
What is Emily Kean Puccioni, MD's Medicare quality score?
Emily Kean Puccioni, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 45/100 (Quality: 51.3, Cost: 48.7). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Emily Kean Puccioni, MD located?
Emily Kean Puccioni, MD is located at 10707 PACIFIC ST, Omaha, NE, 68114. Phone: (402) 397-7989.
What is Emily Kean Puccioni, MD's NPI number?
Emily Kean Puccioni, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1881697944, issued on 05/23/2005.
Does Emily Kean Puccioni, MD prescribe opioids?
Yes, Emily Kean Puccioni, MD had 40 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 1.9%.
How many Urology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 13,350 Urology Physician providers across 54 states in the US. The average Urology Physician provider writes 1,280 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Emily Kean Puccioni, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Emily Kean Puccioni, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Myrbetriq, Gemtesa, Nitrofurantoin. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Emily Kean Puccioni, MD accept Medicare?
Emily Kean Puccioni, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 2,088 Part D claims and 508 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Emily Kean Puccioni, MD's credentials?
Emily Kean Puccioni, MD's NPI is 1881697944 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.