PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Physician Assistant NPI 1093480410 PA-C
Verify on CMS →

Emily Stinebiser, PA-C

Physician Assistant in Monroeville, Pennsylvania.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 156,084 in Physician Assistant, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
135
Medicare Part D claims · 109 beneficiaries · Physician Assistant avg: 832
MIPS score
46.8/100
▼ 37 pts below national avg 83.5 · Below average
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Emily Stinebiser, PA-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 46.8/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 135 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

46.8/100
MIPS score · -37 vs avg
135
Part D claims, 2024
≥4th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Emily Stinebiser, PA-C

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1093480410), first enumerated 08/09/2021.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 135 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 46.8/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    Pennsylvania statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Emily Stinebiser, PA-C's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: PA-BOM annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1093480410 · Physician Assistant

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-LOW · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-MID · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1093480410
  • ENUM-RECENT 2021
  • TAX-MEGA 156K Physician Assistant
  • MIPS-LOW 46.8/100
  • RX-LIGHT 135
  • BOOK-MID 7,836 in Pennsylvania
  • PHOTO-FINISH Nicholas Burbach · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Emily Stinebiser, PA-C's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

47 ≥ 4th percentile 4% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Emily Stinebiser, PA-C sits

This provider among physician assistant peers

Across the 26,497 physician assistant providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Emily Stinebiser, PA-C writes more Part D claims than 34% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 2% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Emily Stinebiser, PA-C, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 34 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one physician assistant peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Emily Stinebiser, PA-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Emily Stinebiser, PA-C?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/09/2021

NPI 1093480410

Primary specialty

Physician Assistant

High-volume

156,084 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

135 84% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 832

MIPS final score

46.8/100 36.7 pts vs avg

Below average band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Pennsylvania

How Physician Assistant compares to other specialties among Pennsylvania providers

Pennsylvania providers
Student in an Organized Heal…6%Pharmacist5%Physical Therapist4.8%Mental Health Counselor4%Internal Medicine Physician3.3%Professional Counselor3.2%Physician Assistant3%
Largest specialties in Pennsylvania (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Emily Stinebiser, PA-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Physician Assistant national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
46.8/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%46.8%
MIPS final score (Physician Assistant) - 46.8/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

2570 HAYMAKER RD
Monroeville, PA 15146
(814) 858-2323

Provider Details

NPI 1093480410
Specialty Physician Assistant
Credentials PA-C
Gender Female
NPI Issued 08/09/2021

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

46.7833
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
17.3934
Quality
51.4568
Cost

Reporting: Group practice

License & disciplinary context - Pennsylvania PA-BOM 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~45K Pennsylvania medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Emily Stinebiser, PA-C. To verify Emily Stinebiser, PA-C's current license status, search the PA-BOM public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

133
Total board actions, Pennsylvania 2023
Across 129 cases
2.96
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Pennsylvania statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
48 cases

PA-BOM publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Pennsylvania disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

135
Total Claims
$2K
Total Drug Cost
109
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
135
Total Day Supply
824
Generic Drug Cost
$619
Opioid Claims
26 (19.3% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
77

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
70.7 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.63
Gender Split
54% female / 46% male
Age Distribution
<65: 21, 65-74: 47, 75-84: 28, 85+: 13

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Emily Stinebiser, PA-C prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Cephalexin
 34
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
22
Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass
Amoxicillin/Potassium Clav
12

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Physician Assistant in PA → All providers in Pennsylvania → Compare specialties →

Physician Assistant Overview

How Emily Stinebiser, PA-C fits within the Physician Assistant landscape nationally.

156,084
Physician Assistant Providers in US
56
States with Physician Assistant
832
Avg Claims per Provider

Emily Stinebiser, PA-C's 135 claims are below the specialty average of 832.

Nationwide Physician Assistant peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Stinebiser, both outside Pennsylvania so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (46.8 here).

Nicholas Burbach 46.8 KS Shawn Rau 46.8 KS Brandi Snell 46.8 KS Tony Vu 46.8 KS

Same NPPES enumeration year (2021)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Marissa Miller Lonoke, AR Haley Ballinger Columbia Falls, MT Tycen Smith Avon, OH James Mast Baltimore, MD

Nearby Physician Assistant Providers in Pennsylvania

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Pennsylvania, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Stinebiser.

One of 7,836 Physician Assistant providers enrolled in Pennsylvania, 5 are shown here.

Matthew Abad
Lansdowne, PA
Ariane Abadi
PA-C
Philadelphia, PA
Rama Abbireddy
PA
Bethlehem, PA
Marianne Abdalah
PA
Sewickley, PA
Donia Abdalla
MMSC, PA-C
Harrisburg, PA

Compare Physician Assistant nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Emily Stinebiser, PA-C's specialty? ▼
Emily Stinebiser, PA-C specializes in Physician Assistant and practices in Monroeville, Pennsylvania. Credentials: PA-C.
How much does Emily Stinebiser, PA-C prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Emily Stinebiser, PA-C wrote 135 Medicare Part D claims totaling $2K in drug costs for 109 beneficiaries.
What is Emily Stinebiser, PA-C's Medicare quality score? ▼
Emily Stinebiser, PA-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 46.8/100 (Quality: 17.4, Cost: 51.5). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Emily Stinebiser, PA-C located? ▼
Emily Stinebiser, PA-C is located at 2570 HAYMAKER RD, Monroeville, PA, 15146. Phone: (814) 858-2323.
What is Emily Stinebiser, PA-C's NPI number? ▼
Emily Stinebiser, PA-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1093480410, issued on 08/09/2021.
Does Emily Stinebiser, PA-C prescribe opioids? ▼
Yes, Emily Stinebiser, PA-C had 26 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 19.3%.
How many Physician Assistant providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 156,084 Physician Assistant providers across 56 states in the US. The average Physician Assistant provider writes 832 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Emily Stinebiser, PA-C prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Emily Stinebiser, PA-C's most frequently prescribed drugs include Cephalexin, Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen, Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Emily Stinebiser, PA-C accept Medicare? ▼
Emily Stinebiser, PA-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 135 Part D claims and 109 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Emily Stinebiser, PA-C's credentials? ▼
Emily Stinebiser, PA-C's NPI is 1093480410 with credentials PA-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.