PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Registered Nurse NPI 1053938803 NP
Verify on CMS →

Emily Teets, NP

Registered Nurse in Cumberland, Maryland.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 185,440 in Registered Nurse, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 276 beneficiaries · Registered Nurse avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
53%
generic claims · 47% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
86.9/100
▲ 3 pts above national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$75.54
5 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Emily Teets, NP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 86.9/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 1,846 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

86.9/100
MIPS score · +3 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2024
53%
generic prescribing
$75.54
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Emily Teets, NP

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1053938803), first enumerated 06/27/2020.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 1,846 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 86.9/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    2 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliations on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $75.54 in reported industry payments (5 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1053938803 · Registered Nurse

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-MID · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1053938803
  • ENUM-RECENT 2020
  • TAX-MEGA 185K Registered Nurse
  • MIPS-ABOVE 86.9/100
  • RX-MID 1,846
  • BOOK-LIGHT 3,026 in Maryland
  • PHOTO-FINISH Esra Neale, CRNA · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Emily Teets, NP's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

87 ≥ 49th percentile 49% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Emily Teets, NP sits

This provider among registered nurse peers

Across the 3,271 registered nurse providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Emily Teets, NP writes more Part D claims than 84% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 53% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Emily Teets, NP, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 84 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one registered nurse peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Emily Teets, NP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Emily Teets, NP?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/27/2020

NPI 1053938803

Primary specialty

Registered Nurse

High-volume

185,440 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,846 74% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,063

MIPS final score

86.9/100 3.4 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Maryland

How Registered Nurse compares to other specialties among Maryland providers

Maryland providers
Behavior Technician15.8%Clinical Social Worker5.4%Home Health Aide4.4%Student in an Organized Heal…4.4%Physical Therapist3.8%Pharmacist3.5%Registered Nurse1.9%
Largest specialties in Maryland (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Emily Teets, NP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Registered Nurse national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
86.9/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%86.9%
MIPS final score (Registered Nurse) - 86.9/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

12502 WILLOWBROOK RD
Cumberland, MD 21502
(240) 964-7000

Provider Details

NPI 1053938803
Specialty Registered Nurse
Credentials NP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 06/27/2020

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

86.9298
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
70.0824
Quality
80.8031
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Emily Teets, NP bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Upmc Western Maryland Health Services LLC
Cumberland, MD
Wellcare Inc
Cumberland, MD

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Emily Teets, NP. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$76

Largest payer

Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

Emily Teets, NP - brand share 47.0%
Registered Nurse average

47% brand-name claims vs 53% generic, on 1,846 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

1,846
Total Claims
$552K
Total Drug Cost
276
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
2,543.367
Total Day Supply
62,688
Brand vs Generic
47% brand / 53% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$533K
Generic Drug Cost
$19K
Antibiotic Claims
334

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
70.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.23
Gender Split
60% female / 40% male
Age Distribution
<65: 62, 65-74: 122, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Emily Teets, NP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Trelegy Ellipta
Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter
420
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa
Albuterol Sulfate
249
Azithromycin
 199
Prednisone
 185
Breztri Aerosphere
Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol
136
Ventolin Hfa
Albuterol Sulfate
92
Montelukast Sodium
 89
Fluticasone Propionate
 58
Levofloxacin
 55
Buspirone Hcl
 43

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Registered Nurse in MD → All providers in Maryland → Compare specialties →

Registered Nurse Overview

How Emily Teets, NP fits within the Registered Nurse landscape nationally.

185,440
Registered Nurse Providers in US
56
States with Registered Nurse
1,063
Avg Claims per Provider

Emily Teets, NP's 1,846 claims are above the specialty average of 1,063.

Nationwide Registered Nurse peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Teets, both outside Maryland so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (86.9 here).

Esra Neale 86.9 NJ Candice Ben 87 AZ Teresa Gonzales 87 AZ Krystal Greeson 87 AZ

Same NPPES enumeration year (2020)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Samiyyah Edmiston Chicago, IL Brittany Wilson Crosby, TX Katie Walsh Powell, TN Steffi Johnson Olympia, WA

Nearby Registered Nurse Providers in Maryland

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Maryland, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Teets.

One of 3,026 Registered Nurse providers enrolled in Maryland, 5 are shown here.

Louis Abanda
RN
Upper Marlboro, MD
Caryn Abbott
RN
Pocomoke City, MD
Bukola Abegunde
Owings Mills, MD
Jamie Abel
Linthicum Heights, MD
Sheri Abell
RN
Edgewater, MD

Compare Registered Nurse nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Emily Teets, NP's specialty? ▼
Emily Teets, NP specializes in Registered Nurse and practices in Cumberland, Maryland. Credentials: NP.
How much does Emily Teets, NP prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Emily Teets, NP wrote 1,846 Medicare Part D claims totaling $552K in drug costs for 276 beneficiaries.
What is Emily Teets, NP's Medicare quality score? ▼
Emily Teets, NP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 86.9/100 (Quality: 70.1, Cost: 80.8). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Emily Teets, NP located? ▼
Emily Teets, NP is located at 12502 WILLOWBROOK RD, Cumberland, MD, 21502. Phone: (240) 964-7000.
What is Emily Teets, NP's NPI number? ▼
Emily Teets, NP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1053938803, issued on 06/27/2020.
Does Emily Teets, NP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs? ▼
Emily Teets, NP's prescribing is 47% brand-name and 53% generic drugs by claim count, with $533K in brand drug costs.
How many Registered Nurse providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 185,440 Registered Nurse providers across 56 states in the US. The average Registered Nurse provider writes 1,063 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Emily Teets, NP prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Emily Teets, NP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Trelegy Ellipta, Albuterol Sulfate Hfa, Azithromycin. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Emily Teets, NP accept Medicare? ▼
Emily Teets, NP appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,846 Part D claims and 276 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Emily Teets, NP's credentials? ▼
Emily Teets, NP's NPI is 1053938803 with credentials NP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.