2026 NPPES data Physician Assistant NPI 1659859767
Verify on CMS →

Emily Vander Schaaf

Physician Assistant in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 149,975 in Physician Assistant, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
94
Medicare Part D claims · 69 beneficiaries · Physician Assistant avg: 790
MIPS score
76.7/100
▼ 6 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Emily Vander Schaaf reported a CMS MIPS final score of 76.7/100 — below the 83.1 national average — and filed 94 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

76.7/100
MIPS score · -6 vs avg
94
Part D claims, 2023

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Emily Vander Schaaf's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

77 21st percentile higher than 21% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Emily Vander Schaaf sits

This provider among physician assistant peers

Across the 27,054 physician assistant providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Emily Vander Schaaf writes more Part D claims than 24% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 19% — placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 95Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Emily Vander Schaaf — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 24 · MIPS quality — percentile: 19
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one physician assistant peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Emily Vander Schaaf. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Emily Vander Schaaf?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/31/2018

NPI 1659859767

Primary specialty

Physician Assistant

High-volume

149,975 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

94 88% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 790

MIPS final score

76.7/100 6.4 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in South Dakota

How Physician Assistant compares to other specialties among South Dakota providers

South Dakota providers

Largest specialties in South Dakota (% of in-state providers)

Physical Therapist — 5.6%Physical Therapist5.6%Pharmacist — 5.5%Pharmacist5.5%Registered Nurse — 4.8%Registered Nurse4.8%Family Nurse Practitioner — 4.7%Family Nurse Practitioner4.7%Mental Health Counselor — 4%Mental Health Counselor4%Physician Assistant — 3.7%Physician Assistant3.7%
Largest specialties in South Dakota (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Emily Vander Schaaf's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Physician Assistant national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
76.7/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Physician Assistant) — 76.7/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%76.7%
MIPS final score (Physician Assistant) — 76.7/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Emily Vander Schaaf appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Physician Assistant provider at 1305 W 18TH ST, Sioux Falls, SD, 57105, with a listed phone of (605) 333-1000. NPI 1659859767 was issued on 07/31/2018. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Vander Schaaf most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 94 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 69 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $930 in drug spend, with an opioid prescribing rate of 12.8%. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 76.7/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 78.6, Cost 44.6), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Physician Assistant is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 149,975 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 790 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

1305 W 18TH ST
Sioux Falls, SD 57105

Provider Details

NPI 1659859767
Specialty Physician Assistant
Gender Female
NPI Issued 07/31/2018

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

76.6912
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
78.5693
Quality
44.5681
Cost
99
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Emily Vander Schaaf bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" — a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Sanford Clinic
Sioux Falls, SD

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

94
Total Claims
$930
Total Drug Cost
69
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
94
Total Day Supply
802
Generic Drug Cost
$863
Opioid Claims
12 (12.8% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
38

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
61.1 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.62
Gender Split
57% female / 43% male
Age Distribution
<65: 34, 65-74: 22, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Cephalexin
13

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Physician Assistant Overview

How Emily Vander Schaaf fits within the Physician Assistant landscape nationally.

149,975
Physician Assistant Providers in US
56
States with Physician Assistant
790
Avg Claims per Provider

Emily Vander Schaaf's 94 claims are below the specialty average of 790.

Nearby Physician Assistant Providers in South Dakota

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in South Dakota, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Vander Schaaf.

Compare Physician Assistant nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the South Dakota medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Physician Assistant peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Emily Vander Schaaf's specialty?
Emily Vander Schaaf specializes in Physician Assistant and practices in Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
How much does Emily Vander Schaaf prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Emily Vander Schaaf wrote 94 Medicare Part D claims totaling $930 in drug costs for 69 beneficiaries.
What is Emily Vander Schaaf's Medicare quality score?
Emily Vander Schaaf has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 76.7/100 (Quality: 78.6, Cost: 44.6). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Emily Vander Schaaf located?
Emily Vander Schaaf is located at 1305 W 18TH ST, Sioux Falls, SD, 57105. Phone: (605) 333-1000.
What is Emily Vander Schaaf's NPI number?
Emily Vander Schaaf's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1659859767, issued on 07/31/2018.
Does Emily Vander Schaaf prescribe opioids?
Yes, Emily Vander Schaaf had 12 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 12.8%.
How many Physician Assistant providers are there in the US?
There are 149,975 Physician Assistant providers across 56 states in the US. The average Physician Assistant provider writes 790 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Emily Vander Schaaf prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Emily Vander Schaaf's most frequently prescribed drugs include Cephalexin. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Emily Vander Schaaf accept Medicare?
Emily Vander Schaaf appears in CMS Medicare data with 94 Part D claims and 69 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Emily Vander Schaaf's credentials?
Emily Vander Schaaf's NPI is 1659859767. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.