PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Transplant Hepatology Physician NPI 1427070010 MD
Verify on CMS →

Francisco Durazo, MD

Transplant Hepatology Physician in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 151 in Transplant Hepatology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
67
Medicare Part D claims · 23 beneficiaries · Transplant Hepatology Physician avg: 553
Generic prescribing
72%
generic claims · 28% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
80.5/100
▼ 3 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Francisco Durazo, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 80.5/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 67 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

80.5/100
MIPS score · -3 vs avg
67
Part D claims, 2024
72%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Francisco Durazo, MD

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1427070010), first enumerated 07/24/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 67 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 80.5/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1427070010 · Transplant Hepatology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-TRACE · MIPS-INLINE · RX-TRACE · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1427070010
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-TRACE 151
  • MIPS-INLINE 80.5/100
  • RX-TRACE 67
  • BOOK-THIN 5 in Wisconsin
  • PHOTO-FINISH Brian Nadeau, M.D. · ±0.5

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Francisco Durazo, MD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

81 ≥ 30th percentile 30% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Francisco Durazo, MD sits

This provider among transplant hepatology physician peers

Across the 56 transplant hepatology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Francisco Durazo, MD writes more Part D claims than 13% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 29% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100022.144.166.288.2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 76 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 16Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 84Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 91 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 84Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 36Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 69 · MIPS quality, percentile: 44Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 9Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 9 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 11 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 24 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 9Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 16 · MIPS quality, percentile: 56Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 51Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 84Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 84Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 84 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 84Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 31 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 84Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 31Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 64 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 89 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 44 · MIPS quality, percentile: 84Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 51 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 4 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 29 · MIPS quality, percentile: 4Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 96 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 84Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 69Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 36 · MIPS quality, percentile: 69Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 71 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 84Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 84Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 56 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 49 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 24Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 56 · MIPS quality, percentile: 64Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 16Francisco Durazo, MD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 29
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one transplant hepatology physician peer from a representative sample of 55; the gold marker is Francisco Durazo, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

✓
Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Francisco Durazo, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Francisco Durazo, MD?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/24/2006

NPI 1427070010

Primary specialty

Transplant Hepatology Physician

Rare

151 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

67 88% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 553

MIPS final score

80.5/100 3 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Wisconsin

How Transplant Hepatology Physician compares to other specialties among Wisconsin providers

Wisconsin providers
Physical Therapist5.5%Registered Nurse4.7%Pharmacist4.6%Student in an Organized Heal…3.4%Professional Counselor3.3%Speech-Language Pathologist3.2%Transplant Hepatology Physic…0%
Largest specialties in Wisconsin (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Francisco Durazo, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Transplant Hepatology Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
80.5/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%80.5%
MIPS final score (Transplant Hepatology Physician) - 80.5/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

9200 W WISCONSIN AVE
Milwaukee, WI 53226
(414) 805-3310

Provider Details

NPI 1427070010
Specialty Transplant Hepatology Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 07/24/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

80.4671
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
66.2426
Quality
68.6477
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

Francisco Durazo, MD - brand share 28.0%
Transplant Hepatology Physician average

28% brand-name claims vs 72% generic, on 67 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

67
Total Claims
$62K
Total Drug Cost
23
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
107
Total Day Supply
2,943
Brand vs Generic
28% brand / 72% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$56K
Generic Drug Cost
$7K
Antibiotic Claims
19

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
64.3 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
3.21
Gender Split
52% female / 48% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Xifaxan
Rifaximin
15
Pantoprazole Sodium
 11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Transplant Hepatology Physician in WI → All providers in Wisconsin → Compare specialties →

Transplant Hepatology Physician Overview

How Francisco Durazo, MD fits within the Transplant Hepatology Physician landscape nationally.

151
Transplant Hepatology Physician Providers in US
36
States with Transplant Hepatology Physician
553
Avg Claims per Provider

Francisco Durazo, MD's 67 claims are below the specialty average of 553.

Nationwide Transplant Hepatology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Durazo, both outside Wisconsin so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (80.5 here).

Brian Nadeau 81 MI Ruchi Bhatia 81.3 OH Adam Hanje 81.3 OH Kalyan Bhamidimarri 81.3 FL

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Omer Junaidi San Antonio, TX Guy Neff Sarasota, FL Kimberly Brown Detroit, MI Abdullah Mubarak Tyler, TX

Nearby Transplant Hepatology Physician Providers in Wisconsin

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Wisconsin, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Durazo.

One of 5 Transplant Hepatology Physician providers enrolled in Wisconsin, 4 are shown here.

Dr. Moises Garcia
MD
Milwaukee, WI
Dr. Ellen Green
MD, PHD
Madison, WI
Dr. Phaedra Tachtatzis
MD
Milwaukee, WI
Dr. Jaimy Villavicencio Kim
M.D.
Milwaukee, WI

Compare Transplant Hepatology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Francisco Durazo, MD's specialty? ▼
Francisco Durazo, MD specializes in Transplant Hepatology Physician and practices in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Credentials: MD.
How much does Francisco Durazo, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Francisco Durazo, MD wrote 67 Medicare Part D claims totaling $62K in drug costs for 23 beneficiaries.
What is Francisco Durazo, MD's Medicare quality score? ▼
Francisco Durazo, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 80.5/100 (Quality: 66.2, Cost: 68.6). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Francisco Durazo, MD located? ▼
Francisco Durazo, MD is located at 9200 W WISCONSIN AVE, Milwaukee, WI, 53226. Phone: (414) 805-3310.
What is Francisco Durazo, MD's NPI number? ▼
Francisco Durazo, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1427070010, issued on 07/24/2006.
Does Francisco Durazo, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs? ▼
Francisco Durazo, MD's prescribing is 28% brand-name and 72% generic drugs by claim count, with $56K in brand drug costs.
How many Transplant Hepatology Physician providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 151 Transplant Hepatology Physician providers across 36 states in the US. The average Transplant Hepatology Physician provider writes 553 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Francisco Durazo, MD prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Francisco Durazo, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Xifaxan, Pantoprazole Sodium. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Francisco Durazo, MD accept Medicare? ▼
Francisco Durazo, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 67 Part D claims and 23 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Francisco Durazo, MD's credentials? ▼
Francisco Durazo, MD's NPI is 1427070010 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.