2026 NPPES data Nephrology Physician NPI 1689698615 MD
Verify on CMS →

Frederick Tan, MD

Nephrology Physician in Bryan, Texas.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 10,806 in Nephrology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 425 beneficiaries · Nephrology Physician avg: 2K
Generic prescribing
93%
generic claims · 7% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
13.1/100
▼ 70 pts below national avg 83.5 · Penalty band

What the federal data shows

Frederick Tan, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 13.1/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 2,328 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

13.1/100
MIPS score · -70 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2024
93%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Frederick Tan, MD

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1689698615), first enumerated 07/26/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 2,328 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 13.1/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    Texas statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Frederick Tan, MD's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: TMB annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1689698615 · Nephrology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-MID · MIPS-LOW · RX-MID · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1689698615
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-MID 11K Nephrology Physician
  • MIPS-LOW 13.1/100
  • RX-MID 2,328
  • BOOK-LIGHT 896 in Texas
  • PHOTO-FINISH David McFadden · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Frederick Tan, MD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

13 ≥ 2nd percentile 2% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). This entry sits in this band. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Frederick Tan, MD sits

This provider among nephrology physician peers

Across the 2,230 nephrology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Frederick Tan, MD writes more Part D claims than 82% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 4% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Frederick Tan, MD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 4
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one nephrology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Frederick Tan, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Frederick Tan, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Frederick Tan, MD?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/26/2006

NPI 1689698615

Primary specialty

Nephrology Physician

Mid-sized

10,806 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

2,328 54% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,511

MIPS final score

13.1/100 70.4 pts vs avg

Penalty band band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Texas

How Nephrology Physician compares to other specialties among Texas providers

Texas providers
Behavior Technician6%Student in an Organized Heal…5.3%Family Nurse Practitioner4.5%Professional Counselor4.4%Pharmacist4.3%Speech-Language Pathologist3.9%Nephrology Physician0.2%
Largest specialties in Texas (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Frederick Tan, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Nephrology Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
13.1/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%13.1%
MIPS final score (Nephrology Physician) - 13.1/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

2801 E 29TH ST
Bryan, TX 77802

Provider Details

NPI 1689698615
Specialty Nephrology Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 07/26/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

13.1453
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
0
Quality
43.8177
Cost

Reporting: Individual

License & disciplinary context - Texas TMB 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~77K Texas medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Frederick Tan, MD. To verify Frederick Tan, MD's current license status, search the TMB public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

344
Total board actions, Texas 2023
Across 334 cases
4.47
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Texas statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
94 cases

TMB publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Texas disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Frederick Tan, MD - brand share 7.0%
Nephrology Physician average

7% brand-name claims vs 93% generic, on 2,328 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

2,328
Total Claims
$376K
Total Drug Cost
425
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
5,337.567
Total Day Supply
157,713
Brand vs Generic
7% brand / 93% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$268K
Generic Drug Cost
$108K
Antibiotic Claims
48

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
73.1 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
3.71
Gender Split
49% female / 51% male
Age Distribution
<65: 69, 65-74: 151, 75-84: 153, 85+: 52

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Frederick Tan, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Calcitriol
446
Hydralazine Hcl
153
Nifedipine Er
Nifedipine
126
Clonidine Hcl
121
Losartan Potassium
113
Amlodipine Besylate
112
Sevelamer Carbonate
96
Metoprolol Succinate
84
Velphoro
Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide
80
Carvedilol
51

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Nephrology Physician Overview

How Frederick Tan, MD fits within the Nephrology Physician landscape nationally.

10,806
Nephrology Physician Providers in US
55
States with Nephrology Physician
1,511
Avg Claims per Provider

Frederick Tan, MD's 2,328 claims are above the specialty average of 1,511.

Nationwide Nephrology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Tan, both outside Texas so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (13.1 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Nephrology Physician Providers in Texas

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Texas, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Tan.

One of 896 Nephrology Physician providers enrolled in Texas, 5 are shown here.

Compare Nephrology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Frederick Tan, MD's specialty?
Frederick Tan, MD specializes in Nephrology Physician and practices in Bryan, Texas. Credentials: MD.
How much does Frederick Tan, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Frederick Tan, MD wrote 2,328 Medicare Part D claims totaling $376K in drug costs for 425 beneficiaries.
What is Frederick Tan, MD's Medicare quality score?
Frederick Tan, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 13.1/100 (Quality: 0, Cost: 43.8). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Frederick Tan, MD located?
Frederick Tan, MD is located at 2801 E 29TH ST, Bryan, TX, 77802. Phone: (979) 774-3960.
What is Frederick Tan, MD's NPI number?
Frederick Tan, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1689698615, issued on 07/26/2006.
Does Frederick Tan, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Frederick Tan, MD's prescribing is 7% brand-name and 93% generic drugs by claim count, with $268K in brand drug costs.
How many Nephrology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 10,806 Nephrology Physician providers across 55 states in the US. The average Nephrology Physician provider writes 1,511 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Frederick Tan, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Frederick Tan, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Calcitriol, Hydralazine Hcl, Nifedipine Er. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Frederick Tan, MD accept Medicare?
Frederick Tan, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 2,328 Part D claims and 425 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Frederick Tan, MD's credentials?
Frederick Tan, MD's NPI is 1689698615 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.