PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Athletic Trainer NPI 1407894116 PA-C
Verify on CMS →

Gail Schmalz, PA-C

Athletic Trainer in Rockport, Maine.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 49,062 in Athletic Trainer, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
160
Medicare Part D claims · 114 beneficiaries · Athletic Trainer avg: 465
MIPS score
98.1/100
▲ 15 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Gail Schmalz, PA-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 98.1/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 160 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

98.1/100
MIPS score · +15 vs avg
160
Part D claims, 2024
≥89th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Gail Schmalz, PA-C

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1407894116), first enumerated 06/03/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 160 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 98.1/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1407894116 · Athletic Trainer

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-MID · MIPS-ELITE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1407894116
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-MID 49K Athletic Trainer
  • MIPS-ELITE 98.1/100
  • RX-LIGHT 160
  • BOOK-THIN 295 in Maine
  • PHOTO-FINISH Cody Sasek, PHD, PA-… · ±0.2

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Gail Schmalz, PA-C's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

98 ≥ 89th percentile 89% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Gail Schmalz, PA-C sits

This provider among athletic trainer peers

Across the 157 athletic trainer providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Gail Schmalz, PA-C writes more Part D claims than 31% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 88% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Gail Schmalz, PA-C, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 31 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one athletic trainer peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Gail Schmalz, PA-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Gail Schmalz, PA-C?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/03/2006

NPI 1407894116

Primary specialty

Athletic Trainer

Mid-sized

49,062 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

160 66% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 465

MIPS final score

98.1/100 14.6 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Maine

How Athletic Trainer compares to other specialties among Maine providers

Maine providers
Clinical Social Worker10.1%Physical Therapist4.9%Pharmacist4%Occupational Therapist3.8%Student in an Organized Heal…3.6%Mental Health Counselor3.5%Athletic Trainer0.9%
Largest specialties in Maine (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Gail Schmalz, PA-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Athletic Trainer national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
98.1/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%98.1%
MIPS final score (Athletic Trainer) - 98.1/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

4 GLEN COVE DR
Rockport, ME 04856
(207) 921-5454

Provider Details

NPI 1407894116
Specialty Athletic Trainer
Credentials PA-C
Gender Female
NPI Issued 06/03/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

98.0699
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
86.1398
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Gail Schmalz, PA-C bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Mainehealth
Portland, ME

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

160
Total Claims
$3K
Total Drug Cost
114
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
160
Total Day Supply
1,015
Generic Drug Cost
$797
Opioid Claims
113 (70.6% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
11

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
71.6 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.05
Gender Split
61% female / 39% male
Age Distribution
<65: 12, 65-74: 57, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Oxycodone Hcl
 93

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Athletic Trainer in ME → All providers in Maine → Compare specialties →

Athletic Trainer Overview

How Gail Schmalz, PA-C fits within the Athletic Trainer landscape nationally.

49,062
Athletic Trainer Providers in US
54
States with Athletic Trainer
465
Avg Claims per Provider

Gail Schmalz, PA-C's 160 claims are below the specialty average of 465.

Nationwide Athletic Trainer peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Schmalz, both outside Maine so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (98.1 here).

Ricco Reynolds 97.8 OR Cody Sasek 98.3 NE Hillary Scheier 98.5 NY Clayton Selby 97.6 CO

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Alecia Puls Cedar Rapids, IA Valerie Tinklepaugh-Hairston Fort Worth, TX Matthew Stumpf Hammond, LA Megan Stankowski Wausau, WI

Nearby Athletic Trainer Providers in Maine

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Maine, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Schmalz.

One of 295 Athletic Trainer providers enrolled in Maine, 5 are shown here.

Amy Adamo
MED, ATC, CSCS
Orono, ME
Jack Adams
ATC
Scarborough, ME
Emily Aimi
Biddeford, ME
Michael Aitken
ATC., LMT
West Gardiner, ME
Jason Ames
Portland, ME

Compare Athletic Trainer nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Gail Schmalz, PA-C's specialty? ▼
Gail Schmalz, PA-C specializes in Athletic Trainer and practices in Rockport, Maine. Credentials: PA-C.
How much does Gail Schmalz, PA-C prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Gail Schmalz, PA-C wrote 160 Medicare Part D claims totaling $3K in drug costs for 114 beneficiaries.
What is Gail Schmalz, PA-C's Medicare quality score? ▼
Gail Schmalz, PA-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 98.1/100 (Quality: 86.1). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Gail Schmalz, PA-C located? ▼
Gail Schmalz, PA-C is located at 4 GLEN COVE DR, Rockport, ME, 04856. Phone: (207) 921-5454.
What is Gail Schmalz, PA-C's NPI number? ▼
Gail Schmalz, PA-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1407894116, issued on 06/03/2006.
Does Gail Schmalz, PA-C prescribe opioids? ▼
Yes, Gail Schmalz, PA-C had 113 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 70.6%.
How many Athletic Trainer providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 49,062 Athletic Trainer providers across 54 states in the US. The average Athletic Trainer provider writes 465 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Gail Schmalz, PA-C prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Gail Schmalz, PA-C's most frequently prescribed drugs include Oxycodone Hcl. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Gail Schmalz, PA-C accept Medicare? ▼
Gail Schmalz, PA-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 160 Part D claims and 114 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Gail Schmalz, PA-C's credentials? ▼
Gail Schmalz, PA-C's NPI is 1407894116 with credentials PA-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.