2026 NPPES data Athletic Trainer NPI 1477091684
Verify on CMS →

Haley Vanderhill

Athletic Trainer in Salt Lake City, Utah.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 48,161 in Athletic Trainer, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
255
Medicare Part D claims · 114 beneficiaries · Athletic Trainer avg: 427
Generic prescribing
96%
generic claims · 4% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
92.1/100
▲ 9 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$15.01
1 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Haley Vanderhill reported a CMS MIPS final score of 92.1/100 - above the 83.1 national average - and filed 255 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

92.1/100
MIPS score · +9 vs avg
255
Part D claims, 2023
96%
generic prescribing
$15.01
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Haley Vanderhill's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

92 Top 32% higher than 68% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Haley Vanderhill sits

This provider among athletic trainer peers

Across the 171 athletic trainer providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Haley Vanderhill writes more Part D claims than 50% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 68% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Haley Vanderhill-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one athletic trainer peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Haley Vanderhill. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Haley Vanderhill?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 02/08/2017

NPI 1477091684

Primary specialty

Athletic Trainer

Mid-sized

48,161 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

255 40% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 427

MIPS final score

92.1/100 9 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Utah

How Athletic Trainer compares to other specialties among Utah providers

Utah providers
Behavior Technician - 12.4%Behavior Technician12.4%Clinical Social Worker - 6.3%Clinical Social Worker6.3%Community Health Worker - 6.1%Community Health Worker6.1%Case Manager/Care Coordinator - 5.9%Case Manager/Care Coordinator5.9%Counselor - 4.9%Counselor4.9%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 4.3%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program4.3%Athletic Trainer - 1%Athletic Trainer1%
Largest specialties in Utah (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Haley Vanderhill's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Athletic Trainer national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
92.1/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Athletic Trainer) - 92.1/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%92.1%
MIPS final score (Athletic Trainer) - 92.1/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Haley Vanderhill appears in the CMS NPPES registry as an Athletic Trainer provider at 590 S WAKARA WAY, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, with a listed phone of (801) 587-1272. NPI 1477091684 was issued on 02/08/2017.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 255 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 114 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $5K in drug spend, split 4% brand-name and 96% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 18.0%. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 92.1/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 85.6), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Athletic Trainer is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 48,161 enrolled providers across 54 states and an average of 427 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

590 S WAKARA WAY
Salt Lake City, UT 84108

Provider Details

NPI 1477091684
Specialty Athletic Trainer
Gender Female
NPI Issued 02/08/2017

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

92.0664
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
85.5753
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Haley Vanderhill bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

University OF Utah Adult Services
Farmington, UT

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Haley Vanderhill. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$15

Largest payer

Bioventus LLC

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Haley Vanderhill - brand share 4.0%
Athletic Trainer average

4% brand-name claims vs 96% generic, on 255 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

255
Total Claims
$5K
Total Drug Cost
114
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
279
Total Day Supply
4,591
Brand vs Generic
4% brand / 96% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$2K
Generic Drug Cost
$3K
Opioid Claims
46 (18.0% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
46

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
68.8 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.31
Gender Split
61% female / 39% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Haley Vanderhill prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Meloxicam
40
Oxycodone Hcl
37
Celecoxib
36
Diclofenac Sodium
28
Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim
Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim
26
Pregabalin
15

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Athletic Trainer Overview

How Haley Vanderhill fits within the Athletic Trainer landscape nationally.

48,161
Athletic Trainer Providers in US
54
States with Athletic Trainer
427
Avg Claims per Provider

Haley Vanderhill's 255 claims are below the specialty average of 427.

Nearby Athletic Trainer Providers in Utah

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Utah, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Vanderhill.

Compare Athletic Trainer nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Utah medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Athletic Trainer peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Haley Vanderhill's specialty?
Haley Vanderhill specializes in Athletic Trainer and practices in Salt Lake City, Utah.
How much does Haley Vanderhill prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Haley Vanderhill wrote 255 Medicare Part D claims totaling $5K in drug costs for 114 beneficiaries.
What is Haley Vanderhill's Medicare quality score?
Haley Vanderhill has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 92.1/100 (Quality: 85.6). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Haley Vanderhill located?
Haley Vanderhill is located at 590 S WAKARA WAY, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108. Phone: (801) 587-1272.
What is Haley Vanderhill's NPI number?
Haley Vanderhill's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1477091684, issued on 02/08/2017.
Does Haley Vanderhill prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Haley Vanderhill's prescribing is 4% brand-name and 96% generic drugs by claim count, with $2K in brand drug costs.
Does Haley Vanderhill prescribe opioids?
Yes, Haley Vanderhill had 46 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 18.0%.
How many Athletic Trainer providers are there in the US?
There are 48,161 Athletic Trainer providers across 54 states in the US. The average Athletic Trainer provider writes 427 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Haley Vanderhill prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Haley Vanderhill's most frequently prescribed drugs include Meloxicam, Oxycodone Hcl, Celecoxib. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Haley Vanderhill accept Medicare?
Haley Vanderhill appears in CMS Medicare data with 255 Part D claims and 114 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Haley Vanderhill's credentials?
Haley Vanderhill's NPI is 1477091684. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.