PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Athletic Trainer NPI 1396152658 PA-C, ATC
Verify on CMS →

Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC

Athletic Trainer in Raleigh, North Carolina.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 49,062 in Athletic Trainer, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
509
Medicare Part D claims · 240 beneficiaries · Athletic Trainer avg: 465
MIPS score
79.1/100
▼ 4 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$1.6K
17 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC reported a CMS MIPS final score of 79.1/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 509 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

79.1/100
MIPS score · -4 vs avg
509
Part D claims, 2024
$1.6K
industry payments (Sunshine Act)
≥26th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1396152658), first enumerated 07/18/2014.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 509 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 79.1/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    2 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliations on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $1.6K in reported industry payments (17 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1396152658 · Athletic Trainer

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-BELOW · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1396152658
  • ENUM-MID 2014
  • TAX-MID 49K Athletic Trainer
  • MIPS-BELOW 79.1/100
  • RX-LIGHT 509
  • BOOK-LIGHT 1,819 in North Carolina
  • PHOTO-FINISH Meredith Bourdeau, P… · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

79 ≥ 26th percentile 26% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC sits

This provider among athletic trainer peers

Across the 157 athletic trainer providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC writes more Part D claims than 73% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 25% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one athletic trainer peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/18/2014

NPI 1396152658

Primary specialty

Athletic Trainer

Mid-sized

49,062 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

509 9% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 465

MIPS final score

79.1/100 4.4 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in North Carolina

How Athletic Trainer compares to other specialties among North Carolina providers

North Carolina providers
Clinical Social Worker7.1%Behavior Technician6.8%Pharmacist4.9%Student in an Organized Heal…4.7%Physical Therapist4.2%Mental Health Counselor4.2%Athletic Trainer0.9%
Largest specialties in North Carolina (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Athletic Trainer national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
79.1/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%79.1%
MIPS final score (Athletic Trainer) - 79.1/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

11200 GOVERNOR MANLY WAY STE 309
Raleigh, NC 27614
(919) 562-9410

Provider Details

NPI 1396152658
Specialty Athletic Trainer
Credentials PA-C, ATC
Gender Female
NPI Issued 07/18/2014

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

79.1419
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
62.2509
Quality
68.222
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Carolina Physical Therapy Associates LLC
Louisburg, NC
Orthopaedic Specialists OF North Carolina, P.A.
Raleigh, NC

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$1.6K

Largest payer

Arthrex, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

509
Total Claims
$2K
Total Drug Cost
240
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
520.167
Total Day Supply
4,202
Generic Drug Cost
$2K
Opioid Claims
215 (42.2% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
40

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
70.3 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.38
Gender Split
70% female / 30% male
Age Distribution
<65: 37, 65-74: 121, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Ondansetron Hcl
 138
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen
Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen
67
Tramadol Hcl
 67
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
65
Gabapentin
 28
Methylprednisolone
 23
Meloxicam
 17
Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim
Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim
17
Oxycodone Hcl
 16
Cyclobenzaprine Hcl
 14

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Athletic Trainer in NC → All providers in North Carolina → Compare specialties →

Athletic Trainer Overview

How Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC fits within the Athletic Trainer landscape nationally.

49,062
Athletic Trainer Providers in US
54
States with Athletic Trainer
465
Avg Claims per Provider

Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC's 509 claims are above the specialty average of 465.

Nationwide Athletic Trainer peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Denson, both outside North Carolina so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (79.1 here).

Meredith Bourdeau 79.1 NY Kelsey Parente 79.4 VA Gary Pugh 79.4 VA Ashley Loontjer 78.9 NE

Same NPPES enumeration year (2014)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Shirley Clinton Greenville, SC Jonathan Marques El Monte, CA Becky Meisel Columbia, SC Garet Simpson Spokane Valley, WA

Nearby Athletic Trainer Providers in North Carolina

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in North Carolina, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Denson.

One of 1,819 Athletic Trainer providers enrolled in North Carolina, 5 are shown here.

Evan Abatiell
MS, ATC, LAT
Wilson, NC
Elizabeth Abernathy
ATC, CES
Denver, NC
Jessica Achatz
ATC, LAT
Cary, NC
Steven Ackart
PT
Candler, NC
Brooke Adams
ATC, LAT
Mooresville, NC

Compare Athletic Trainer nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC's specialty? ▼
Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC specializes in Athletic Trainer and practices in Raleigh, North Carolina. Credentials: PA-C, ATC.
How much does Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC wrote 509 Medicare Part D claims totaling $2K in drug costs for 240 beneficiaries.
What is Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC's Medicare quality score? ▼
Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 79.1/100 (Quality: 62.3, Cost: 68.2). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC located? ▼
Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC is located at 11200 GOVERNOR MANLY WAY STE 309, Raleigh, NC, 27614. Phone: (919) 562-9410.
What is Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC's NPI number? ▼
Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1396152658, issued on 07/18/2014.
Does Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC prescribe opioids? ▼
Yes, Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC had 215 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 42.2%.
How many Athletic Trainer providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 49,062 Athletic Trainer providers across 54 states in the US. The average Athletic Trainer provider writes 465 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC's most frequently prescribed drugs include Ondansetron Hcl, Oxycodone-Acetaminophen, Tramadol Hcl. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC accept Medicare? ▼
Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC appears in CMS Medicare data with 509 Part D claims and 240 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC's credentials? ▼
Hannah Denson, PA-C, ATC's NPI is 1396152658 with credentials PA-C, ATC. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.