PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse NPI 1740897628 NP
Verify on CMS →

Hannah Williams, NP

Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse in Rochester, New York.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 6,553 in Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 458 beneficiaries · Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse avg: 752
Generic prescribing
88%
generic claims · 11% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
95.2/100
▲ 12 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$216.95
5 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Hannah Williams, NP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 95.2/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 1,680 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

95.2/100
MIPS score · +12 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2023
88%
generic prescribing
$216.95
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1740897628 · Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MID · MIPS-ELITE · RX-MID · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1740897628
  • ENUM-RECENT 2020
  • TAX-MID 7K Critical Care
  • MIPS-ELITE 95.2/100
  • RX-MID 1,680
  • BOOK-THIN 442 in New York
  • PHOTO-FINISH Nicole Brassington · ±0.1

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Hannah Williams, NP's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

95 ≥ 78th percentile 78% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Hannah Williams, NP sits

This provider among critical care medicine registered nurse peers

Across the 184 critical care medicine registered nurse providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Hannah Williams, NP writes more Part D claims than 91% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 80% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Hannah Williams, NP, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 91 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one critical care medicine registered nurse peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Hannah Williams, NP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Hannah Williams, NP?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 09/25/2020

NPI 1740897628

Primary specialty

Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse

Mid-sized

6,553 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,680 123% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 752

MIPS final score

95.2/100 11.7 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in New York

How Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse compares to other specialties among New York providers

New York providers
Student in an Organized Heal…7.8%Registered Nurse5.2%Clinical Social Worker4.9%Social Worker4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist4.5%Licensed Practical Nurse4.3%Critical Care Medicine Regis…0.1%
Largest specialties in New York (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Hannah Williams, NP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
95.2/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%95.2%
MIPS final score (Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse) - 95.2/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

104 EAST AVE
Rochester, NY 14604
(585) 397-7339

Provider Details

NPI 1740897628
Specialty Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse
Credentials NP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 09/25/2020

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

95.1965
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
70.6225
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Hannah Williams, NP bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Flaherty Family Medicine PLLC
Rochester, NY

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Hannah Williams, NP. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$217

Largest payer

E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - New York NYSBPMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~100K New York medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Hannah Williams, NP. To verify Hannah Williams, NP's current license status, search the NYSBPMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

312
Total board actions, New York 2023
Across 302 cases
3.12
Actions per 1,000 licensees
New York statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
89 cases

NYSBPMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the New York disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Hannah Williams, NP - brand share 11.0%
Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse average

11% brand-name claims vs 88% generic, on 1,680 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

1,680
Total Claims
$161K
Total Drug Cost
458
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
3,086
Total Day Supply
82,786
Brand vs Generic
11% brand / 88% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$112K
Generic Drug Cost
$48K
Opioid Claims
131 (7.8% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
154

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
73.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.08
Gender Split
56% female / 44% male
Age Distribution
<65: 40, 65-74: 222, 75-84: 147, 85+: 49

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Hannah Williams, NP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Atorvastatin Calcium
 86
Methylprednisolone
 81
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa
Albuterol Sulfate
55
Azithromycin
 49
Levothyroxine Sodium
 45
Metformin Hcl
 45
Gabapentin
 41
Amlodipine Besylate
 39
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
38
Tramadol Hcl
 37

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse in NY → All providers in New York → Compare specialties →

Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse Overview

How Hannah Williams, NP fits within the Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse landscape nationally.

6,553
Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse Providers in US
53
States with Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse
752
Avg Claims per Provider

Hannah Williams, NP's 1,680 claims are above the specialty average of 752.

Nationwide Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Williams, both outside New York so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (95.2 here).

Nicole Brassington 95.1 KY Laura Lowe 95.1 VA Megan Winslow 95.1 VA Helen Barbis 95.3 OH

Same NPPES enumeration year (2020)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Erika Bahler Peachtree City, GA Russell Anderson Gainesville, FL Nachel Rhoades Indianapolis, IN Garrett Thomason Dayton, OH

Nearby Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse Providers in New York

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in New York, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Williams.

One of 442 Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse providers enrolled in New York, 5 are shown here.

Dr. Anna Abeyta
RN
New York, NY
Dr. Lio Abrakhimora
REGISTERED NURSE RN
Hicksville, NY
Dr. Diego Acero
FNP
Manhasset, NY
Gaeun Ahn
New York, NY
Dr. Milinda Aiello
NP
Bronx, NY

Compare Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Hannah Williams, NP's specialty? ▼
Hannah Williams, NP specializes in Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse and practices in Rochester, New York. Credentials: NP.
How much does Hannah Williams, NP prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2023, Hannah Williams, NP wrote 1,680 Medicare Part D claims totaling $161K in drug costs for 458 beneficiaries.
What is Hannah Williams, NP's Medicare quality score? ▼
Hannah Williams, NP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 95.2/100 (Quality: 70.6). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Hannah Williams, NP located? ▼
Hannah Williams, NP is located at 104 EAST AVE, Rochester, NY, 14604. Phone: (585) 397-7339.
What is Hannah Williams, NP's NPI number? ▼
Hannah Williams, NP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1740897628, issued on 09/25/2020.
Does Hannah Williams, NP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs? ▼
Hannah Williams, NP's prescribing is 11% brand-name and 88% generic drugs by claim count, with $112K in brand drug costs.
Does Hannah Williams, NP prescribe opioids? ▼
Yes, Hannah Williams, NP had 131 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 7.8%.
How many Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 6,553 Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse providers across 53 states in the US. The average Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse provider writes 752 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Hannah Williams, NP prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Hannah Williams, NP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Atorvastatin Calcium, Methylprednisolone, Albuterol Sulfate Hfa. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Hannah Williams, NP accept Medicare? ▼
Hannah Williams, NP appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,680 Part D claims and 458 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Hannah Williams, NP's credentials? ▼
Hannah Williams, NP's NPI is 1740897628 with credentials NP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.