2026 NPPES data Nuclear Cardiology Physician NPI 1245203165 MD FACC
Verify on CMS →

Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC

Nuclear Cardiology Physician in New Windsor, New York.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 374 in Nuclear Cardiology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
5K
Medicare Part D claims · 1K beneficiaries · Nuclear Cardiology Physician avg: 4K
Generic prescribing
86%
generic claims · 14% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
94.2/100
▲ 11 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$248.44
2 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC reported a CMS MIPS final score of 94.2/100 - above the 83.1 national average - and filed 4,873 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

94.2/100
MIPS score · +11 vs avg
5K
Part D claims, 2023
86%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

94 Top 25% higher than 75% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC sits

This provider among nuclear cardiology physician peers

Across the 162 nuclear cardiology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC writes more Part D claims than 62% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 76% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 76
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one nuclear cardiology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 02/10/2006

NPI 1245203165

Primary specialty

Nuclear Cardiology Physician

Rare

374 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

4,873 21% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 4,019

MIPS final score

94.2/100 11.1 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in New York

How Nuclear Cardiology Physician compares to other specialties among New York providers

New York providers
Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 7.8%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program7.8%Registered Nurse - 5.2%Registered Nurse5.2%Clinical Social Worker - 4.9%Clinical Social Worker4.9%Social Worker - 4.5%Social Worker4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist - 4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist4.5%Licensed Practical Nurse - 4.3%Licensed Practical Nurse4.3%Nuclear Cardiology Physician - 0%Nuclear Cardiology Physician0%
Largest specialties in New York (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Nuclear Cardiology Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
94.2/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Nuclear Cardiology Physician) - 94.2/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%94.2%
MIPS final score (Nuclear Cardiology Physician) - 94.2/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Nuclear Cardiology Physician provider holding MD FACC credentials at 939 LITTLE BRITAIN RD, New Windsor, NY, 12553, with a listed phone of (845) 567-1800. NPI 1245203165 was issued on 02/10/2006.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 4,873 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 1,230 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $855K in drug spend, split 14% brand-name and 86% generic by claim count. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 94.2/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 78.3), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Nuclear Cardiology Physician is a narrow specialty nationwide, with 374 enrolled providers across 37 states and an average of 4,019 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

939 LITTLE BRITAIN RD
New Windsor, NY 12553

Provider Details

NPI 1245203165
Specialty Nuclear Cardiology Physician
Credentials MD FACC
Gender Male
NPI Issued 02/10/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

94.2464
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
78.2615
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Hudson Valley Cardiovascular Practice PC
New Windsor, NY

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$248

Largest payer

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - New York NYSBPMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~100K New York medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC. To verify Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC's current license status, search the NYSBPMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

312
Total board actions, New York 2023
Across 302 cases
3.12
Actions per 1,000 licensees
New York statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
89 cases

NYSBPMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the New York disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC - brand share 14.0%
Nuclear Cardiology Physician average

14% brand-name claims vs 86% generic, on 4,873 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

4,873
Total Claims
$855K
Total Drug Cost
1,230
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
13,048
Total Day Supply
390,594
Brand vs Generic
14% brand / 86% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$740K
Generic Drug Cost
$115K
Antibiotic Claims
11

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
75.5 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.32
Gender Split
47% female / 53% male
Age Distribution
<65: 66, 65-74: 507, 75-84: 479, 85+: 178

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Metoprolol Succinate
524
Atorvastatin Calcium
426
Amlodipine Besylate
419
Eliquis
Apixaban
342
Rosuvastatin Calcium
342
Lisinopril
222
Carvedilol
191
Metoprolol Tartrate
189
Losartan Potassium
168
Furosemide
162

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Nuclear Cardiology Physician Overview

How Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC fits within the Nuclear Cardiology Physician landscape nationally.

374
Nuclear Cardiology Physician Providers in US
37
States with Nuclear Cardiology Physician
4,019
Avg Claims per Provider

Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC's 4,873 claims are above the specialty average of 4,019.

Nearby Nuclear Cardiology Physician Providers in New York

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in New York, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Weerackody.

Compare Nuclear Cardiology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the New York medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Nuclear Cardiology Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC's specialty?
Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC specializes in Nuclear Cardiology Physician and practices in New Windsor, New York. Credentials: MD FACC.
How much does Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC wrote 4,873 Medicare Part D claims totaling $855K in drug costs for 1,230 beneficiaries.
What is Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC's Medicare quality score?
Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 94.2/100 (Quality: 78.3). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC located?
Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC is located at 939 LITTLE BRITAIN RD, New Windsor, NY, 12553. Phone: (845) 567-1800.
What is Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC's NPI number?
Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1245203165, issued on 02/10/2006.
Does Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC's prescribing is 14% brand-name and 86% generic drugs by claim count, with $740K in brand drug costs.
How many Nuclear Cardiology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 374 Nuclear Cardiology Physician providers across 37 states in the US. The average Nuclear Cardiology Physician provider writes 4,019 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC's most frequently prescribed drugs include Metoprolol Succinate, Atorvastatin Calcium, Amlodipine Besylate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC accept Medicare?
Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC appears in CMS Medicare data with 4,873 Part D claims and 1,230 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC's credentials?
Harshan Weerackody, MD FACC's NPI is 1245203165 with credentials MD FACC. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.