PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Adult Health Nurse Practitioner NPI 1699297648 AGPCNP-C
Verify on CMS →

Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C

Adult Health Nurse Practitioner in Belgrade, Maine.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 29,811 in Adult Health Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
406
Medicare Part D claims · 87 beneficiaries · Adult Health Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
MIPS score
79.3/100
▼ 4 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 79.3/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 406 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

79.3/100
MIPS score · -4 vs avg
406
Part D claims, 2024
≥26th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1699297648), first enumerated 07/12/2017.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 406 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 79.3/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1699297648 · Adult Health Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MID · MIPS-BELOW · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1699297648
  • ENUM-RECENT 2017
  • TAX-MID 30K Adult Health
  • MIPS-BELOW 79.3/100
  • RX-LIGHT 406
  • BOOK-THIN 132 in Maine
  • PHOTO-FINISH Elizabeth Akano, NP · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

79 ≥ 26th percentile 26% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C sits

This provider among adult health nurse practitioner peers

Across the 4,201 adult health nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C writes more Part D claims than 50% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 24% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 24
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one adult health nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/12/2017

NPI 1699297648

Primary specialty

Adult Health Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

29,811 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

406 69% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,291

MIPS final score

79.3/100 4.2 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Maine

How Adult Health Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Maine providers

Maine providers
Clinical Social Worker10.1%Physical Therapist4.9%Pharmacist4%Occupational Therapist3.8%Student in an Organized Heal…3.6%Mental Health Counselor3.5%Adult Health Nurse Practitio…0.4%
Largest specialties in Maine (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Adult Health Nurse Practitioner national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
79.3/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%79.3%
MIPS final score (Adult Health Nurse Practitioner) - 79.3/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

PO BOX 127
Belgrade, ME 04917
(207) 378-4660

Provider Details

NPI 1699297648
Specialty Adult Health Nurse Practitioner
Credentials AGPCNP-C
Gender Male
NPI Issued 07/12/2017

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

79.2722
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
73.7265
Quality
60.5143
Cost
76
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

406
Total Claims
$31K
Total Drug Cost
87
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
539.467
Total Day Supply
15,019
Generic Drug Cost
$7K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
79.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.55
Gender Split
61% female / 39% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Sertraline Hcl
 53
Levothyroxine Sodium
 37
Mirtazapine
 31
Atorvastatin Calcium
 27
Pantoprazole Sodium
 27
Furosemide
 21
Donepezil Hcl
 16
Rosuvastatin Calcium
 14
Citalopram Hbr
Citalopram Hydrobromide
13
Escitalopram Oxalate
 13

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Adult Health Nurse Practitioner in ME → All providers in Maine → Compare specialties →

Adult Health Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C fits within the Adult Health Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

29,811
Adult Health Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
55
States with Adult Health Nurse Practitioner
1,291
Avg Claims per Provider

Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C's 406 claims are below the specialty average of 1,291.

Nationwide Adult Health Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Meyer, both outside Maine so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (79.3 here).

Cortney Fondriest 79.3 OH Elizabeth Akano 79.3 MD Sabrina Wells 79.3 MD Steven Dawsey 79.3 FL

Same NPPES enumeration year (2017)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Dianne Johnson Fredericksburg, VA Stephen Goon Sacramento, CA Margaret Welch Fountainville, PA Meghan Blaylock Scottsbluff, NE

Nearby Adult Health Nurse Practitioner Providers in Maine

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Maine, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Meyer.

One of 132 Adult Health Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Maine, 5 are shown here.

Clare Abercrombie
DNP- APRN
Dover Foxcroft, ME
Sarah Adams
NP
Lewiston, ME
Danielle Agrella
NP
Presque Isle, ME
Allison Ainsworth
NP
Fort Fairfield, ME
Margaret Akers
ANP
Portland, ME

Compare Adult Health Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C's specialty? ▼
Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C specializes in Adult Health Nurse Practitioner and practices in Belgrade, Maine. Credentials: AGPCNP-C.
How much does Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C wrote 406 Medicare Part D claims totaling $31K in drug costs for 87 beneficiaries.
What is Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C's Medicare quality score? ▼
Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 79.3/100 (Quality: 73.7, Cost: 60.5). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C located? ▼
Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C is located at PO BOX 127, Belgrade, ME, 04917. Phone: (207) 378-4660.
What is Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C's NPI number? ▼
Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1699297648, issued on 07/12/2017.
How many Adult Health Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 29,811 Adult Health Nurse Practitioner providers across 55 states in the US. The average Adult Health Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,291 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C's most frequently prescribed drugs include Sertraline Hcl, Levothyroxine Sodium, Mirtazapine. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C accept Medicare? ▼
Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 406 Part D claims and 87 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C's credentials? ▼
Isaiah Meyer, AGPCNP-C's NPI is 1699297648 with credentials AGPCNP-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.