2026 NPPES data General Practice Physician NPI 1295196384 MD, MBA
Verify on CMS →

Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA

General Practice Physician in Norwich, Connecticut.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 16,838 in General Practice Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
34
Medicare Part D claims · 14 beneficiaries · General Practice Physician avg: 3K
Generic prescribing
56%
generic claims · 44% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
95.1/100
▲ 12 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional

What the federal data shows

Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA reported a CMS MIPS final score of 95.1/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 34 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

95.1/100
MIPS score · +12 vs avg
34
Part D claims, 2024
56%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1295196384), first enumerated 03/16/2016.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 34 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 95.1/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1295196384 · General Practice Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-ELITE · RX-TRACE · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1295196384
  • ENUM-MID 2016
  • TAX-MID 17K General Practice
  • MIPS-ELITE 95.1/100
  • RX-TRACE 34
  • BOOK-THIN 81 in Connecticut
  • PHOTO-FINISH Joann Bolude · ±0.1

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

95 ≥ 78th percentile 78% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA sits

This provider among general practice physician peers

Across the 714 general practice physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA writes more Part D claims than 8% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 78% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one general practice physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 03/16/2016

NPI 1295196384

Primary specialty

General Practice Physician

Mid-sized

16,838 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

34 99% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 2,957

MIPS final score

95.1/100 11.6 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Connecticut

How General Practice Physician compares to other specialties among Connecticut providers

Connecticut providers
Clinical Social Worker8.4%Student in an Organized Heal…7.9%Physical Therapist4.2%Pharmacist3.9%Internal Medicine Physician3.4%Mental Health Counselor3.2%General Practice Physician0.1%
Largest specialties in Connecticut (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the General Practice Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
95.1/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%95.1%
MIPS final score (General Practice Physician) - 95.1/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

79 WAWECUS ST STE 103
Norwich, CT 06360

Provider Details

NPI 1295196384
Specialty General Practice Physician
Credentials MD, MBA
Gender Male
NPI Issued 03/16/2016

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

95.1126
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
86.3184
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA - brand share 44.0%
General Practice Physician average

44% brand-name claims vs 56% generic, on 34 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

34
Total Claims
$5K
Total Drug Cost
14
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
46
Total Day Supply
1,206
Brand vs Generic
44% brand / 56% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$5K
Generic Drug Cost
$287

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.4 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.97
Age Distribution
<65: 0, 65-74: N/A, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

General Practice Physician Overview

How Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA fits within the General Practice Physician landscape nationally.

16,838
General Practice Physician Providers in US
56
States with General Practice Physician
2,957
Avg Claims per Provider

Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA's 34 claims are below the specialty average of 2,957.

Nationwide General Practice Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Peterson, both outside Connecticut so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (95.1 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2016)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby General Practice Physician Providers in Connecticut

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Connecticut, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Peterson.

One of 81 General Practice Physician providers enrolled in Connecticut, 5 are shown here.

Compare General Practice Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA's specialty?
Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA specializes in General Practice Physician and practices in Norwich, Connecticut. Credentials: MD, MBA.
How much does Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA wrote 34 Medicare Part D claims totaling $5K in drug costs for 14 beneficiaries.
What is Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA's Medicare quality score?
Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 95.1/100 (Quality: 86.3). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA located?
Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA is located at 79 WAWECUS ST STE 103, Norwich, CT, 06360. Phone: (860) 886-1862.
What is Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA's NPI number?
Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1295196384, issued on 03/16/2016.
Does Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA's prescribing is 44% brand-name and 56% generic drugs by claim count, with $5K in brand drug costs.
How many General Practice Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 16,838 General Practice Physician providers across 56 states in the US. The average General Practice Physician provider writes 2,957 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA accept Medicare?
Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA appears in CMS Medicare data with 34 Part D claims and 14 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA's credentials?
Jacob Peterson, MD, MBA's NPI is 1295196384 with credentials MD, MBA. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.