PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner NPI 1801874805 ARNP
Verify on CMS →

Jacqueline Moore, ARNP

Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 2,871 in Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
22
Medicare Part D claims · Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner avg: 241
MIPS score
91.2/100
▲ 8 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$20.29
1 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Jacqueline Moore, ARNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 91.2/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 22 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

91.2/100
MIPS score · +8 vs avg
22
Part D claims, 2024
$20.29
industry payments (Sunshine Act)
≥61st
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Jacqueline Moore, ARNP

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1801874805), first enumerated 01/09/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 22 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 91.2/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $20.29 in reported industry payments (1 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1801874805 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-TRACE · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1801874805
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-NARROW 2,871
  • MIPS-ABOVE 91.2/100
  • RX-TRACE 22
  • BOOK-THIN 23 in Oklahoma
  • PHOTO-FINISH Debra Besner, N.P. · ±0.1

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Jacqueline Moore, ARNP's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

91 ≥ 61st percentile 61% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Jacqueline Moore, ARNP sits

This provider among obstetrics & gynecology nurse practitioner peers

Across the 229 obstetrics & gynecology nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Jacqueline Moore, ARNP writes more Part D claims than 10% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 73% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Jacqueline Moore, ARNP, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one obstetrics & gynecology nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Jacqueline Moore, ARNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Jacqueline Moore, ARNP?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 01/09/2006

NPI 1801874805

Primary specialty

Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner

Niche

2,871 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

22 91% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 241

MIPS final score

91.2/100 7.7 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Oklahoma

How Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Oklahoma providers

Oklahoma providers
Case Manager/Care Coordinator9.6%Mental Health Counselor7%Behavior Technician6.6%Peer Specialist5.6%Counselor4.9%Student in an Organized Heal…4.2%Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurs…0%
Largest specialties in Oklahoma (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Jacqueline Moore, ARNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
91.2/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%91.2%
MIPS final score (Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner) - 91.2/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

6600 S YALE AVE
Tulsa, OK 74136
(918) 502-7200

Provider Details

NPI 1801874805
Specialty Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner
Credentials ARNP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 01/09/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

91.2403
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
74.1347
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Jacqueline Moore, ARNP. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$20

Largest payer

PFIZER INC.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

22
Total Claims
$3K
Total Drug Cost
N/A
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
33.6
Total Day Supply
930
Generic Drug Cost
$502

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
50.8 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
0.73
More Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner in OK → All providers in Oklahoma → Compare specialties →

Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Jacqueline Moore, ARNP fits within the Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

2,871
Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
52
States with Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner
241
Avg Claims per Provider

Jacqueline Moore, ARNP's 22 claims are below the specialty average of 241.

Nationwide Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Moore, both outside Oklahoma so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (91.2 here).

Debra Besner 91.3 NY Amy Burris 91.1 NC Susan Glass 91.1 NC Jessica Helminen 91.1 NC

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Emily Orgler Tupelo, MS Tracey Fremd Sacramento, CA Donna Campbell Birmingham, AL Elizabeth Macnaughton Wellington, FL

Nearby Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner Providers in Oklahoma

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Oklahoma, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Moore.

One of 23 Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Oklahoma, 5 are shown here.

Jenna Aizenman
Tulsa, OK
Cynthia Bigheart
ARNP, MSN
Enid, OK
Amy Brooks
MS, ARNP, WHCNP
Oklahoma City, OK
Estacia Cooper
CNP
Tulsa, OK
Meredith Dewitte
APRN-CNP
Oklahoma City, OK

Compare Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Jacqueline Moore, ARNP's specialty? ▼
Jacqueline Moore, ARNP specializes in Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner and practices in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Credentials: ARNP.
How much does Jacqueline Moore, ARNP prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Jacqueline Moore, ARNP wrote 22 Medicare Part D claims totaling $3K in drug costs for N/A beneficiaries.
What is Jacqueline Moore, ARNP's Medicare quality score? ▼
Jacqueline Moore, ARNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 91.2/100 (Quality: 74.1). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Jacqueline Moore, ARNP located? ▼
Jacqueline Moore, ARNP is located at 6600 S YALE AVE, Tulsa, OK, 74136. Phone: (918) 502-7200.
What is Jacqueline Moore, ARNP's NPI number? ▼
Jacqueline Moore, ARNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1801874805, issued on 01/09/2006.
How many Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 2,871 Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner providers across 52 states in the US. The average Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner provider writes 241 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Jacqueline Moore, ARNP accept Medicare? ▼
Jacqueline Moore, ARNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 22 Part D claims and N/A Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Jacqueline Moore, ARNP's credentials? ▼
Jacqueline Moore, ARNP's NPI is 1801874805 with credentials ARNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.