PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Specialist NPI 1821096579 M.D.
Verify on CMS →

James Devanney, M.D.

Specialist in Torrington, Connecticut.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 69,567 in Specialist, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
3K
Medicare Part D claims · 685 beneficiaries · Specialist avg: 2K
Generic prescribing
90%
generic claims · 9% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
83.3/100
▼ 0 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$375.1
13 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

James Devanney, M.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 83.3/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 2,758 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

83.3/100
MIPS score · 0 vs avg
3K
Part D claims, 2024
90%
generic prescribing
$375.1
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about James Devanney, M.D.

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1821096579), first enumerated 07/07/2005.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 2,758 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 83.3/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $375.1 in reported industry payments (13 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1821096579 · Specialist

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-INLINE · RX-MID · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1821096579
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2005
  • TAX-MEGA 70K Specialist
  • MIPS-INLINE 83.3/100
  • RX-MID 2,758
  • BOOK-LIGHT 519 in Connecticut
  • PHOTO-FINISH William Zollinger, M… · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

James Devanney, M.D.'s MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

83 ≥ 39th percentile 39% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where James Devanney, M.D. sits

This provider among specialist peers

Across the 4,261 specialist providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, James Devanney, M.D. writes more Part D claims than 79% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 48% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0James Devanney, M.D., Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 79 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one specialist peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is James Devanney, M.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about James Devanney, M.D.?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/07/2005

NPI 1821096579

Primary specialty

Specialist

High-volume

69,567 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

2,758 81% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,524

MIPS final score

83.3/100 0.2 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Connecticut

How Specialist compares to other specialties among Connecticut providers

Connecticut providers
Clinical Social Worker8.4%Student in an Organized Heal…7.9%Physical Therapist4.2%Pharmacist3.9%Internal Medicine Physician3.4%Mental Health Counselor3.2%Specialist0.6%
Largest specialties in Connecticut (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

James Devanney, M.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Specialist national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
83.3/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%83.3%
MIPS final score (Specialist) - 83.3/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

538 LITCHFIELD ST
Torrington, CT 06790
(860) 496-8990

Provider Details

NPI 1821096579
Specialty Specialist
Credentials M.D.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 07/07/2005

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

83.3087
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
72.1678
Quality
56.9026
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for James Devanney, M.D.. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$375

Largest payer

Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

James Devanney, M.D. - brand share 9.0%
Specialist average

9% brand-name claims vs 90% generic, on 2,758 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

2,758
Total Claims
$250K
Total Drug Cost
685
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
6,289.233
Total Day Supply
183,738
Brand vs Generic
9% brand / 90% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$184K
Generic Drug Cost
$64K
Opioid Claims
108 (3.9% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
118

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
76.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.45
Gender Split
25% female / 75% male
Age Distribution
<65: 37, 65-74: 263, 75-84: 284, 85+: 101

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What James Devanney, M.D. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Tamsulosin Hcl
 685
Finasteride
 513
Dutasteride
 247
Oxybutynin Chloride Er
Oxybutynin Chloride
137
Myrbetriq
Mirabegron
134
Estradiol
 118
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen
Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen
99
Testosterone Cypionate
 88
Solifenacin Succinate
 75
Gemtesa
Vibegron
64

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Specialist in CT → All providers in Connecticut → Compare specialties →

Specialist Overview

How James Devanney, M.D. fits within the Specialist landscape nationally.

69,567
Specialist Providers in US
55
States with Specialist
1,524
Avg Claims per Provider

James Devanney, M.D.'s 2,758 claims are above the specialty average of 1,524.

Nationwide Specialist peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Devanney, both outside Connecticut so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (83.3 here).

William Zollinger 83.3 LA Banji Awosika 83.3 FL Melanie Costa 83.3 PA Kenneth Pechman 83.3 WI

Same NPPES enumeration year (2005)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Shauna Schneider Poway, CA Matthew Goldinger Butler, PA Thomas Ryscavage York, PA Pinky Ronen Houston, TX

Nearby Specialist Providers in Connecticut

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Connecticut, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Devanney.

One of 519 Specialist providers enrolled in Connecticut, 5 are shown here.

Dr. Jay Abbott
M.D.
Litchfield, CT
Dr. Karen Abrams
M.D.
Westport, CT
Micheal Acocella
B.S., P.T.
Greenwich, CT
Dr. Diana Adams
M.D.
Greenwich, CT
Dr. Zosimo Adefuin
MD
Bridgeport, CT

Compare Specialist nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is James Devanney, M.D.'s specialty? ▼
James Devanney, M.D. specializes in Specialist and practices in Torrington, Connecticut. Credentials: M.D..
How much does James Devanney, M.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, James Devanney, M.D. wrote 2,758 Medicare Part D claims totaling $250K in drug costs for 685 beneficiaries.
What is James Devanney, M.D.'s Medicare quality score? ▼
James Devanney, M.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 83.3/100 (Quality: 72.2, Cost: 56.9). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is James Devanney, M.D. located? ▼
James Devanney, M.D. is located at 538 LITCHFIELD ST, Torrington, CT, 06790. Phone: (860) 496-8990.
What is James Devanney, M.D.'s NPI number? ▼
James Devanney, M.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1821096579, issued on 07/07/2005.
Does James Devanney, M.D. prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs? ▼
James Devanney, M.D.'s prescribing is 9% brand-name and 90% generic drugs by claim count, with $184K in brand drug costs.
Does James Devanney, M.D. prescribe opioids? ▼
Yes, James Devanney, M.D. had 108 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 3.9%.
How many Specialist providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 69,567 Specialist providers across 55 states in the US. The average Specialist provider writes 1,524 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does James Devanney, M.D. prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, James Devanney, M.D.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Tamsulosin Hcl, Finasteride, Dutasteride. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does James Devanney, M.D. accept Medicare? ▼
James Devanney, M.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 2,758 Part D claims and 685 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify James Devanney, M.D.'s credentials? ▼
James Devanney, M.D.'s NPI is 1821096579 with credentials M.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.