2026 NPPES data Interventional Cardiology Physician NPI 1285665182 M.D.
Verify on CMS →

James Ford, M.D.

Interventional Cardiology Physician in Paducah, Kentucky.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 3,400 in Interventional Cardiology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 304 beneficiaries · Interventional Cardiology Physician avg: 3K
Generic prescribing
74%
generic claims · 26% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
95.5/100
▲ 12 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$243.89
5 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

James Ford, M.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 95.5/100 - above the 83.1 national average - and filed 1,832 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

95.5/100
MIPS score · +12 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2023
74%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

James Ford, M.D.'s MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

96 Top 21% higher than 79% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where James Ford, M.D. sits

This provider among interventional cardiology physician peers

Across the 1,386 interventional cardiology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, James Ford, M.D. writes more Part D claims than 36% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 80% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8James Ford, M.D.-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 36 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one interventional cardiology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is James Ford, M.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

James Ford, M.D. practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about James Ford, M.D.?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/06/2006

NPI 1285665182

Primary specialty

Interventional Cardiology Physician

Niche

3,400 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,832 39% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 2,984

MIPS final score

95.5/100 12.4 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Kentucky

How Interventional Cardiology Physician compares to other specialties among Kentucky providers

Kentucky providers
Family Nurse Practitioner - 5.9%Family Nurse Practitioner5.9%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 5.2%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5.2%Pharmacist - 4.8%Pharmacist4.8%Mental Health Counselor - 4.6%Mental Health Counselor4.6%Clinical Social Worker - 4.1%Clinical Social Worker4.1%Physical Therapist - 3.7%Physical Therapist3.7%Interventional Cardiology Physician - 0.1%Interventional Cardiology Physician0.1%
Largest specialties in Kentucky (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

James Ford, M.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Interventional Cardiology Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
95.5/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Interventional Cardiology Physician) - 95.5/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%95.5%
MIPS final score (Interventional Cardiology Physician) - 95.5/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

James Ford, M.D. appears in the CMS NPPES registry as an Interventional Cardiology Physician provider holding M.D. credentials at 2601 KENTUCKY AVE, Paducah, KY, 42003, with a listed phone of (270) 575-3113. NPI 1285665182 was issued on 07/06/2006.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 1,832 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 304 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $441K in drug spend, split 26% brand-name and 74% generic by claim count. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 95.5/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 89.6), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Interventional Cardiology Physician is a narrow specialty nationwide, with 3,400 enrolled providers across 53 states and an average of 2,984 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

2601 KENTUCKY AVE
Paducah, KY 42003

Provider Details

NPI 1285665182
Specialty Interventional Cardiology Physician
Credentials M.D.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 07/06/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

95.5077
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
89.5953
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for James Ford, M.D.. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$244

Largest payer

Abbott Laboratories

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

James Ford, M.D. - brand share 26.0%
Interventional Cardiology Physician average

26% brand-name claims vs 74% generic, on 1,832 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

1,832
Total Claims
$441K
Total Drug Cost
304
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
3,961
Total Day Supply
117,623
Brand vs Generic
26% brand / 74% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$407K
Generic Drug Cost
$34K
Antibiotic Claims
12

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
76.9 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.52
Gender Split
39% female / 61% male
Age Distribution
<65: 14, 65-74: 108, 75-84: 115, 85+: 67

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What James Ford, M.D. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Atorvastatin Calcium
183
Eliquis
Apixaban
157
Metoprolol Succinate
115
Prasugrel Hcl
109
Clopidogrel
Clopidogrel Bisulfate
91
Carvedilol
90
Rosuvastatin Calcium
82
Xarelto
Rivaroxaban
80
Furosemide
76
Repatha Sureclick
Evolocumab
76

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Interventional Cardiology Physician Overview

How James Ford, M.D. fits within the Interventional Cardiology Physician landscape nationally.

3,400
Interventional Cardiology Physician Providers in US
53
States with Interventional Cardiology Physician
2,984
Avg Claims per Provider

James Ford, M.D.'s 1,832 claims are below the specialty average of 2,984.

Nearby Interventional Cardiology Physician Providers in Kentucky

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Kentucky, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Ford.

Compare Interventional Cardiology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Kentucky medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Interventional Cardiology Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is James Ford, M.D.'s specialty?
James Ford, M.D. specializes in Interventional Cardiology Physician and practices in Paducah, Kentucky. Credentials: M.D..
How much does James Ford, M.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, James Ford, M.D. wrote 1,832 Medicare Part D claims totaling $441K in drug costs for 304 beneficiaries.
What is James Ford, M.D.'s Medicare quality score?
James Ford, M.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 95.5/100 (Quality: 89.6). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is James Ford, M.D. located?
James Ford, M.D. is located at 2601 KENTUCKY AVE, Paducah, KY, 42003. Phone: (270) 575-3113.
What is James Ford, M.D.'s NPI number?
James Ford, M.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1285665182, issued on 07/06/2006.
Does James Ford, M.D. prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
James Ford, M.D.'s prescribing is 26% brand-name and 74% generic drugs by claim count, with $407K in brand drug costs.
How many Interventional Cardiology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 3,400 Interventional Cardiology Physician providers across 53 states in the US. The average Interventional Cardiology Physician provider writes 2,984 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does James Ford, M.D. prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, James Ford, M.D.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Atorvastatin Calcium, Eliquis, Metoprolol Succinate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does James Ford, M.D. accept Medicare?
James Ford, M.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,832 Part D claims and 304 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify James Ford, M.D.'s credentials?
James Ford, M.D.'s NPI is 1285665182 with credentials M.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.