2026 NPPES data Gerontology Nurse Practitioner NPI 1093069841 GNP-BC
Verify on CMS →

Jana Heger, GNP-BC

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner in Cass Lake, Minnesota.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 10,056 in Gerontology Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
4K
Medicare Part D claims · 124 beneficiaries · Gerontology Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
82%
generic claims · 16% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
80.5/100
▼ 3 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral

What the federal data shows

Jana Heger, GNP-BC reported a CMS MIPS final score of 80.5/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 4,397 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

80.5/100
MIPS score · -3 vs avg
4K
Part D claims, 2024
82%
generic prescribing
≥30th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Jana Heger, GNP-BC

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1093069841), first enumerated 11/01/2012.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 4,397 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 80.5/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1093069841 · Gerontology Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-INLINE · RX-MID · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1093069841
  • ENUM-MID 2012
  • TAX-MID 10K Gerontology Nurse
  • MIPS-INLINE 80.5/100
  • RX-MID 4,397
  • BOOK-THIN 329 in Minnesota
  • PHOTO-FINISH Laura Bochenczak, APNP · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Jana Heger, GNP-BC's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

81 ≥ 30th percentile 30% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Jana Heger, GNP-BC sits

This provider among gerontology nurse practitioner peers

Across the 1,256 gerontology nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Jana Heger, GNP-BC writes more Part D claims than 94% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 30% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100023.146.269.392.4Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Jana Heger, GNP-BC, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 94 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one gerontology nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Jana Heger, GNP-BC. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Jana Heger, GNP-BC?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 11/01/2012

NPI 1093069841

Primary specialty

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

10,056 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

4,397 226% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,350

MIPS final score

80.5/100 3 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Minnesota

How Gerontology Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Minnesota providers

Minnesota providers
Behavior Technician12%Clinical Social Worker4.7%Physical Therapist4%Pharmacist3.7%Student in an Organized Heal…3.4%Mental Health Counselor3.1%Gerontology Nurse Practition…0.2%
Largest specialties in Minnesota (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Jana Heger, GNP-BC's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Gerontology Nurse Practitioner national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
80.5/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%80.5%
MIPS final score (Gerontology Nurse Practitioner) - 80.5/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

425 7TH ST NW
Cass Lake, MN 56633

Provider Details

NPI 1093069841
Specialty Gerontology Nurse Practitioner
Credentials GNP-BC
Gender Female
NPI Issued 11/01/2012

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

80.471
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
73.9659
Quality
33.925
Cost
95
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Jana Heger, GNP-BC bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Department OF Health And Human Services Phs Ihs
Cass Lake, MN

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Jana Heger, GNP-BC - brand share 16.0%
Gerontology Nurse Practitioner average

16% brand-name claims vs 82% generic, on 4,397 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

4,397
Total Claims
$228K
Total Drug Cost
124
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
4,422.733
Total Day Supply
126,604
Brand vs Generic
16% brand / 82% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$183K
Generic Drug Cost
$39K
Opioid Claims
200 (4.5% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
36

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
69.1 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.01
Gender Split
69% female / 31% male
Age Distribution
<65: 24, 65-74: 65, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Jana Heger, GNP-BC prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Atorvastatin Calcium
297
Lisinopril
289
Metoprolol Succinate
155
Omeprazole
148
Synthroid
Levothyroxine Sodium
143
Losartan Potassium
141
Gabapentin
134
Simvastatin
120
Metformin Hcl
117
Sertraline Hcl
100

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Jana Heger, GNP-BC fits within the Gerontology Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

10,056
Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
54
States with Gerontology Nurse Practitioner
1,350
Avg Claims per Provider

Jana Heger, GNP-BC's 4,397 claims are above the specialty average of 1,350.

Nationwide Gerontology Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Heger, both outside Minnesota so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (80.5 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2012)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Providers in Minnesota

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Minnesota, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Heger.

One of 329 Gerontology Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Minnesota, 5 are shown here.

Compare Gerontology Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Jana Heger, GNP-BC's specialty?
Jana Heger, GNP-BC specializes in Gerontology Nurse Practitioner and practices in Cass Lake, Minnesota. Credentials: GNP-BC.
How much does Jana Heger, GNP-BC prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Jana Heger, GNP-BC wrote 4,397 Medicare Part D claims totaling $228K in drug costs for 124 beneficiaries.
What is Jana Heger, GNP-BC's Medicare quality score?
Jana Heger, GNP-BC has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 80.5/100 (Quality: 74, Cost: 33.9). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Jana Heger, GNP-BC located?
Jana Heger, GNP-BC is located at 425 7TH ST NW, Cass Lake, MN, 56633. Phone: (218) 335-3200.
What is Jana Heger, GNP-BC's NPI number?
Jana Heger, GNP-BC's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1093069841, issued on 11/01/2012.
Does Jana Heger, GNP-BC prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Jana Heger, GNP-BC's prescribing is 16% brand-name and 82% generic drugs by claim count, with $183K in brand drug costs.
Does Jana Heger, GNP-BC prescribe opioids?
Yes, Jana Heger, GNP-BC had 200 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 4.5%.
How many Gerontology Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 10,056 Gerontology Nurse Practitioner providers across 54 states in the US. The average Gerontology Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,350 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Jana Heger, GNP-BC prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Jana Heger, GNP-BC's most frequently prescribed drugs include Atorvastatin Calcium, Lisinopril, Metoprolol Succinate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Jana Heger, GNP-BC accept Medicare?
Jana Heger, GNP-BC appears in CMS Medicare data with 4,397 Part D claims and 124 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Jana Heger, GNP-BC's credentials?
Jana Heger, GNP-BC's NPI is 1093069841 with credentials GNP-BC. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.