PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Acute Care Nurse Practitioner NPI 1972228377 ACNPC-AG
Verify on CMS →

Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG

Acute Care Nurse Practitioner in Richmond, Virginia.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 25,345 in Acute Care Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
12
Medicare Part D claims · Acute Care Nurse Practitioner avg: 623
MIPS score
56.1/100
▼ 27 pts below national avg 83.5 · Mid-tier
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG reported a CMS MIPS final score of 56.1/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 12 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

56.1/100
MIPS score · -27 vs avg
12
Part D claims, 2024
≥5th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1972228377), first enumerated 10/07/2022.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 12 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 56.1/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    3 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliations on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1972228377 · Acute Care Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MID · MIPS-LOW · RX-TRACE · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1972228377
  • ENUM-RECENT 2022
  • TAX-MID 25K Acute Care
  • MIPS-LOW 56.1/100
  • RX-TRACE 12
  • BOOK-LIGHT 808 in Virginia
  • PHOTO-FINISH Whitney Jones · ±0.1

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

56 ≥ 5th percentile 5% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). This entry sits in this band. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG sits

This provider among acute care nurse practitioner peers

Across the 3,830 acute care nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG writes more Part D claims than 1% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 2% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100023.146.269.392.4Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 1 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one acute care nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 10/07/2022

NPI 1972228377

Primary specialty

Acute Care Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

25,345 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

12 98% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 623

MIPS final score

56.1/100 27.4 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Virginia

How Acute Care Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Virginia providers

Virginia providers
Behavior Technician5.5%Clinical Social Worker5.2%Student in an Organized Heal…4.7%Physical Therapist4.6%Pharmacist4.4%Professional Counselor4%Acute Care Nurse Practitioner0.5%
Largest specialties in Virginia (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Acute Care Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
56.1/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%56.1%
MIPS final score (Acute Care Nurse Practitioner) - 56.1/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

5801 BREMO RD
Richmond, VA 23226
(804) 285-2011

Provider Details

NPI 1972228377
Specialty Acute Care Nurse Practitioner
Credentials ACNPC-AG
Gender Female
NPI Issued 10/07/2022

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

56.0677
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
26.7133
Quality
76.1516
Cost

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

According to CMS billing records, Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG is affiliated with 3 Medicare-billing facilities.

Emergency Medicine Associates P.A., P.C.
Haymarket, VA
Virginia Urology Center
Richmond, VA
Vituity-Virginia Hospitalists PC
Richmond, VA

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

12
Total Claims
$47
Total Drug Cost
N/A
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
12
Total Day Supply
54
Brand Drug Cost
$0
Generic Drug Cost
$47

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
68.1 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.12
More Acute Care Nurse Practitioner in VA → All providers in Virginia → Compare specialties →

Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG fits within the Acute Care Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

25,345
Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
53
States with Acute Care Nurse Practitioner
623
Avg Claims per Provider

Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG's 12 claims are below the specialty average of 623.

Nationwide Acute Care Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Abernathie, both outside Virginia so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (56.1 here).

Whitney Jones 56 GA Shawn Melley 56 NV Nickalaus Swan 55.7 TX Douglas Accountius 55.7 NM

Same NPPES enumeration year (2022)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Tia Kellman New York, NY Samuel Rosado San Antonio, TX Elaine Lansing Springfield, IL Kathryn Szczechowski Charleston, SC

Nearby Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Providers in Virginia

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Virginia, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Abernathie.

One of 808 Acute Care Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Virginia, 5 are shown here.

Lauren Abate
CRNP
Arlington, VA
Mohamed Abokersh
NP
Woodbridge, VA
Elizabeth Adams
A.C.N.P.
Richmond, VA
Aderonke Ademola
Norfolk, VA
April Ahn
NP
Fredericksburg, VA

Compare Acute Care Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG's specialty? ▼
Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG specializes in Acute Care Nurse Practitioner and practices in Richmond, Virginia. Credentials: ACNPC-AG.
How much does Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG wrote 12 Medicare Part D claims totaling $47 in drug costs for N/A beneficiaries.
What is Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG's Medicare quality score? ▼
Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 56.1/100 (Quality: 26.7, Cost: 76.2). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG located? ▼
Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG is located at 5801 BREMO RD, Richmond, VA, 23226. Phone: (804) 285-2011.
What is Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG's NPI number? ▼
Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1972228377, issued on 10/07/2022.
How many Acute Care Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 25,345 Acute Care Nurse Practitioner providers across 53 states in the US. The average Acute Care Nurse Practitioner provider writes 623 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG accept Medicare? ▼
Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG appears in CMS Medicare data with 12 Part D claims and N/A Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG's credentials? ▼
Jane Abernathie, ACNPC-AG's NPI is 1972228377 with credentials ACNPC-AG. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.