2026 NPPES data Military Health Care Provider NPI 1043641236 PA-C
Verify on CMS →

Jeffrey Landon, PA-C

Military Health Care Provider in National City, California.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 3,156 in Military Health Care Provider, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
4K
Medicare Part D claims · 288 beneficiaries · Military Health Care Provider avg: 705
Generic prescribing
95%
generic claims · 5% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
28.8/100
▼ 55 pts below national avg 83.5 · Below average
Industry payments
$1.6K
71 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Jeffrey Landon, PA-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 28.8/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 3,756 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

28.8/100
MIPS score · -55 vs avg
4K
Part D claims, 2024
95%
generic prescribing
$1.6K
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Jeffrey Landon, PA-C

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1043641236), first enumerated 12/12/2013.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 3,756 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 28.8/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $1.6K in reported industry payments (71 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    California statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Jeffrey Landon, PA-C's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: MBC annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1043641236 · Military Health Care Provider

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-LOW · RX-MID · BOOK-LIGHT · NEAR-MIPS

  • NPI-10 1043641236
  • ENUM-MID 2013
  • TAX-NARROW 3,156
  • MIPS-LOW 28.8/100
  • RX-MID 3,756
  • BOOK-LIGHT 544 in California
  • NEAR-MIPS Cyril Chavis · 18.4

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Jeffrey Landon, PA-C's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

29 ≥ 3rd percentile 3% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). This entry sits in this band. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Jeffrey Landon, PA-C sits

This provider among military health care provider peers

Across the 47 military health care provider providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Jeffrey Landon, PA-C writes more Part D claims than 89% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 0% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 9 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 24 · MIPS quality, percentile: 54Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 41 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 46Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 61 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 46 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 24 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 39Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 61Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 74 · MIPS quality, percentile: 96Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 96Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 96 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 96Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 11 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 54 · MIPS quality, percentile: 59Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 11Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 39 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 41Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 89 · MIPS quality, percentile: 9Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 59 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 24Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 76 · MIPS quality, percentile: 26Jeffrey Landon, PA-C, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 89 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one military health care provider peer from a representative sample of 46; the gold marker is Jeffrey Landon, PA-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Jeffrey Landon, PA-C?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 12/12/2013

NPI 1043641236

Primary specialty

Military Health Care Provider

Niche

3,156 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

3,756 vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 705

MIPS final score

28.8/100 54.7 pts vs avg

Below average band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in California

How Military Health Care Provider compares to other specialties among California providers

California providers
Behavior Technician17.9%Marriage & Family Therapist5.4%Student in an Organized Heal…5.1%Mental Health Counselor3.7%Pharmacist3.4%Clinical Social Worker3.1%Military Health Care Provider0.1%
Largest specialties in California (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Jeffrey Landon, PA-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Military Health Care Provider national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
28.8/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%28.8%
MIPS final score (Military Health Care Provider) - 28.8/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

610 EUCLID AVE STE 200
National City, CA 91950

Provider Details

NPI 1043641236
Specialty Military Health Care Provider
Credentials PA-C
Gender Male
NPI Issued 12/12/2013

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

28.7618
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
23.3333
Quality
31.4281
Cost

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Jeffrey Landon, PA-C bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Pacific Health Systems LP
National City, CA

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Jeffrey Landon, PA-C. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$1.6K

Largest payer

Alkermes, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - California MBC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~150K California medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Jeffrey Landon, PA-C. To verify Jeffrey Landon, PA-C's current license status, search the MBC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

576
Total board actions, California 2023
Across 556 cases
3.84
Actions per 1,000 licensees
California statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
186 cases

MBC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the California disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Jeffrey Landon, PA-C - brand share 5.0%
Military Health Care Provider average

5% brand-name claims vs 95% generic, on 3,756 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

3,756
Total Claims
$585K
Total Drug Cost
288
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
4,006.933
Total Day Supply
107,306
Brand vs Generic
5% brand / 95% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$472K
Generic Drug Cost
$113K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
66.7 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.24
Gender Split
53% female / 47% male
Age Distribution
<65: 101, 65-74: 110, 75-84: 55, 85+: 22

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Jeffrey Landon, PA-C prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Escitalopram Oxalate
291
Olanzapine
266
Quetiapine Fumarate
257
Risperidone
250
Lorazepam
242
Mirtazapine
156
Clozapine
147
Sertraline Hcl
141
Paroxetine Hcl
116
Benztropine Mesylate
111

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Military Health Care Provider Overview

How Jeffrey Landon, PA-C fits within the Military Health Care Provider landscape nationally.

3,156
Military Health Care Provider Providers in US
51
States with Military Health Care Provider
705
Avg Claims per Provider

Jeffrey Landon, PA-C's 3,756 claims are above the specialty average of 705.

Nationwide Military Health Care Provider peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Landon, both outside California so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (28.8 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2013)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Military Health Care Provider Providers in California

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in California, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Landon.

One of 544 Military Health Care Provider providers enrolled in California, 5 are shown here.

Compare Military Health Care Provider nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Jeffrey Landon, PA-C's specialty?
Jeffrey Landon, PA-C specializes in Military Health Care Provider and practices in National City, California. Credentials: PA-C.
How much does Jeffrey Landon, PA-C prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Jeffrey Landon, PA-C wrote 3,756 Medicare Part D claims totaling $585K in drug costs for 288 beneficiaries.
What is Jeffrey Landon, PA-C's Medicare quality score?
Jeffrey Landon, PA-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 28.8/100 (Quality: 23.3, Cost: 31.4). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Jeffrey Landon, PA-C located?
Jeffrey Landon, PA-C is located at 610 EUCLID AVE STE 200, National City, CA, 91950. Phone: (619) 267-9257.
What is Jeffrey Landon, PA-C's NPI number?
Jeffrey Landon, PA-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1043641236, issued on 12/12/2013.
Does Jeffrey Landon, PA-C prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Jeffrey Landon, PA-C's prescribing is 5% brand-name and 95% generic drugs by claim count, with $472K in brand drug costs.
How many Military Health Care Provider providers are there in the US?
There are 3,156 Military Health Care Provider providers across 51 states in the US. The average Military Health Care Provider provider writes 705 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Jeffrey Landon, PA-C prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Jeffrey Landon, PA-C's most frequently prescribed drugs include Escitalopram Oxalate, Olanzapine, Quetiapine Fumarate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Jeffrey Landon, PA-C accept Medicare?
Jeffrey Landon, PA-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 3,756 Part D claims and 288 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Jeffrey Landon, PA-C's credentials?
Jeffrey Landon, PA-C's NPI is 1043641236 with credentials PA-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.