2026 NPPES data Diagnostic Radiology Physician NPI 1295756039 MD
Verify on CMS →

Jeffrey Takahashi, MD

Diagnostic Radiology Physician in Middletown, Connecticut.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 39,551 in Diagnostic Radiology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
36
Medicare Part D claims · 32 beneficiaries · Diagnostic Radiology Physician avg: 63
MIPS score
65.2/100
▼ 18 pts below national avg 83.1 · Mid-tier
Industry payments
$33.95
1 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Jeffrey Takahashi, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 65.2/100 - below the 83.1 national average - and filed 36 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

65.2/100
MIPS score · -18 vs avg
36
Part D claims, 2023
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Jeffrey Takahashi, MD's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

65 7th percentile higher than 7% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). This entry sits in this band. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Jeffrey Takahashi, MD sits

This provider among diagnostic radiology physician peers

Across the 1,123 diagnostic radiology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Jeffrey Takahashi, MD writes more Part D claims than 69% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 7% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100022.344.666.989.3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Jeffrey Takahashi, MD-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 69 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one diagnostic radiology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Jeffrey Takahashi, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Jeffrey Takahashi, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 5 hospital affiliations - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Jeffrey Takahashi, MD?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/21/2006

NPI 1295756039

Primary specialty

Diagnostic Radiology Physician

Mid-sized

39,551 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

36 43% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 63

MIPS final score

65.2/100 17.9 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Connecticut

How Diagnostic Radiology Physician compares to other specialties among Connecticut providers

Connecticut providers
Clinical Social Worker - 8.4%Clinical Social Worker8.4%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 7.7%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program7.7%Physical Therapist - 4.2%Physical Therapist4.2%Pharmacist - 3.9%Pharmacist3.9%Internal Medicine Physician - 3.4%Internal Medicine Physician3.4%Mental Health Counselor - 3.2%Mental Health Counselor3.2%Diagnostic Radiology Physician - 0.6%Diagnostic Radiology Physician0.6%
Largest specialties in Connecticut (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Jeffrey Takahashi, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Diagnostic Radiology Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
65.2/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Diagnostic Radiology Physician) - 65.2/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%65.2%
MIPS final score (Diagnostic Radiology Physician) - 65.2/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Jeffrey Takahashi, MD appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Diagnostic Radiology Physician provider holding MD credentials at 28 CRESCENT ST, Middletown, CT, 06457, with a listed phone of (860) 344-6293. NPI 1295756039 was issued on 07/21/2006.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 36 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 32 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $512 in drug spend. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 65.2/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 65.9, Cost 13.3), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Diagnostic Radiology Physician is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 39,551 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 63 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

28 CRESCENT ST
Middletown, CT 06457

Provider Details

NPI 1295756039
Specialty Diagnostic Radiology Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 07/21/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

65.2443
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
65.9355
Quality
13.266
Cost

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Jeffrey Takahashi, MD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

According to CMS billing records, Jeffrey Takahashi, MD is affiliated with 5 Medicare-billing facilities.

Diagnostic Imaging Services OF CT LLC
Norwich, CT
Meriden Imaging Center Inc
Wallingford, CT
Midstate Radiology Associates LLC
Meriden, CT
Starling Physicians, PLLC
Newington, CT
Vein Centers, LLC
Bristol, CT

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Jeffrey Takahashi, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$34

Largest payer

Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

36
Total Claims
$512
Total Drug Cost
32
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
36
Total Day Supply
768
Generic Drug Cost
$511

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
72.4 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.45
Gender Split
63% female / 38% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Lidocaine-Prilocaine
Lidocaine/Prilocaine
31

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Diagnostic Radiology Physician Overview

How Jeffrey Takahashi, MD fits within the Diagnostic Radiology Physician landscape nationally.

39,551
Diagnostic Radiology Physician Providers in US
56
States with Diagnostic Radiology Physician
63
Avg Claims per Provider

Jeffrey Takahashi, MD's 36 claims are below the specialty average of 63.

Nearby Diagnostic Radiology Physician Providers in Connecticut

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Connecticut, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Takahashi.

Compare Diagnostic Radiology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Connecticut medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Diagnostic Radiology Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Jeffrey Takahashi, MD's specialty?
Jeffrey Takahashi, MD specializes in Diagnostic Radiology Physician and practices in Middletown, Connecticut. Credentials: MD.
How much does Jeffrey Takahashi, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Jeffrey Takahashi, MD wrote 36 Medicare Part D claims totaling $512 in drug costs for 32 beneficiaries.
What is Jeffrey Takahashi, MD's Medicare quality score?
Jeffrey Takahashi, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 65.2/100 (Quality: 65.9, Cost: 13.3). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Jeffrey Takahashi, MD located?
Jeffrey Takahashi, MD is located at 28 CRESCENT ST, Middletown, CT, 06457. Phone: (860) 344-6293.
What is Jeffrey Takahashi, MD's NPI number?
Jeffrey Takahashi, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1295756039, issued on 07/21/2006.
How many Diagnostic Radiology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 39,551 Diagnostic Radiology Physician providers across 56 states in the US. The average Diagnostic Radiology Physician provider writes 63 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Jeffrey Takahashi, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Jeffrey Takahashi, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Lidocaine-Prilocaine. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Jeffrey Takahashi, MD accept Medicare?
Jeffrey Takahashi, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 36 Part D claims and 32 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Jeffrey Takahashi, MD's credentials?
Jeffrey Takahashi, MD's NPI is 1295756039 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.