2026 NPPES data Gerontology Nurse Practitioner NPI 1265936637 AGNP
Verify on CMS →

Jennifer Heuring, AGNP

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner in Cape Girardeau, Missouri. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 9,625 in Gerontology Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
172
Medicare Part D claims · 93 beneficiaries · Gerontology Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
MIPS score
92.6/100
▲ 9 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$66.41
3 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Jennifer Heuring, AGNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 92.6/100 — above the 83.1 national average — and filed 172 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

92.6/100
MIPS score · +9 vs avg
172
Part D claims, 2023
$66.41
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Jennifer Heuring, AGNP's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

93 Top 32% higher than 68% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Jennifer Heuring, AGNP sits

This provider among gerontology nurse practitioner peers

Across the 1,301 gerontology nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Jennifer Heuring, AGNP writes more Part D claims than 29% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 69% — placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100023.146.269.392.4Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Jennifer Heuring, AGNP — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 29 · MIPS quality — percentile: 69
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one gerontology nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Jennifer Heuring, AGNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Jennifer Heuring, AGNP?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 03/21/2018

NPI 1265936637

Primary specialty

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

9,625 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

172 87% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,283

MIPS final score

92.6/100 9.5 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Missouri

How Gerontology Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Missouri providers

Missouri providers

Largest specialties in Missouri (% of in-state providers)

Pharmacist — 4.8%Pharmacist4.8%Professional Counselor — 4.8%Professional Counselor4.8%Speech-Language Pathologist — 4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist4.5%Clinical Social Worker — 4.5%Clinical Social Worker4.5%Family Nurse Practitioner — 4.3%Family Nurse Practitioner4.3%Physical Therapist — 4%Physical Therapist4%Gerontology Nurse Practitioner — 0.2%Gerontology Nurse Practitioner0.2%
Largest specialties in Missouri (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Jennifer Heuring, AGNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Gerontology Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
92.6/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Gerontology Nurse Practitioner) — 92.6/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%92.6%
MIPS final score (Gerontology Nurse Practitioner) — 92.6/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Jennifer Heuring, AGNP appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Gerontology Nurse Practitioner provider holding AGNP credentials at 211 SAINT FRANCIS DR, Cape Girardeau, MO, 63703, with a listed phone of (573) 331-5770. NPI 1265936637 was issued on 03/21/2018. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Heuring most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 172 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 93 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $12K in drug spend. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 92.6/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 85), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 9,625 enrolled providers across 54 states and an average of 1,283 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

211 SAINT FRANCIS DR
Cape Girardeau, MO 63703

Provider Details

NPI 1265936637
Specialty Gerontology Nurse Practitioner
Credentials AGNP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 03/21/2018

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

92.5751
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
85.0323
Quality
88
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Jennifer Heuring, AGNP bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" — a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Saint Francis Medical Center
★★★☆☆ 3/5
Cape Girardeau, MO
Acute Care Hospitals
CMS CCN: 260183

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) — CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Jennifer Heuring, AGNP. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$66

Largest payer

Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias — they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

172
Total Claims
$12K
Total Drug Cost
93
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
181
Total Day Supply
3,651
Generic Drug Cost
$2K
Antibiotic Claims
38

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
72.3 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.29
Gender Split
59% female / 41% male
Age Distribution
<65: 20, 65-74: 31, 75-84: 29, 85+: 13

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Prednisone
20
Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass
Amoxicillin/Potassium Clav
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Jennifer Heuring, AGNP fits within the Gerontology Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

9,625
Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
54
States with Gerontology Nurse Practitioner
1,283
Avg Claims per Provider

Jennifer Heuring, AGNP's 172 claims are below the specialty average of 1,283.

Nearby Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Providers in Missouri

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Missouri, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Heuring.

Compare Gerontology Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Missouri medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Gerontology Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Jennifer Heuring, AGNP's specialty?
Jennifer Heuring, AGNP specializes in Gerontology Nurse Practitioner and practices in Cape Girardeau, Missouri. Credentials: AGNP.
How much does Jennifer Heuring, AGNP prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Jennifer Heuring, AGNP wrote 172 Medicare Part D claims totaling $12K in drug costs for 93 beneficiaries.
What is Jennifer Heuring, AGNP's Medicare quality score?
Jennifer Heuring, AGNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 92.6/100 (Quality: 85). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Jennifer Heuring, AGNP located?
Jennifer Heuring, AGNP is located at 211 SAINT FRANCIS DR, Cape Girardeau, MO, 63703. Phone: (573) 331-5770.
What is Jennifer Heuring, AGNP's NPI number?
Jennifer Heuring, AGNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1265936637, issued on 03/21/2018.
How many Gerontology Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 9,625 Gerontology Nurse Practitioner providers across 54 states in the US. The average Gerontology Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,283 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Jennifer Heuring, AGNP prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Jennifer Heuring, AGNP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Prednisone, Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Jennifer Heuring, AGNP accept Medicare?
Jennifer Heuring, AGNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 172 Part D claims and 93 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Jennifer Heuring, AGNP's credentials?
Jennifer Heuring, AGNP's NPI is 1265936637 with credentials AGNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.