PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Medical Physician Assistant NPI 1073899670 RPA-C
Verify on CMS →

Jessica Carey, RPA-C

Medical Physician Assistant in Buffalo, New York.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 40,580 in Medical Physician Assistant, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
470
Medicare Part D claims · 133 beneficiaries · Medical Physician Assistant avg: 1K
MIPS score
87.1/100
▲ 4 pts above national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Jessica Carey, RPA-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 87.1/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 470 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

87.1/100
MIPS score · +4 vs avg
470
Part D claims, 2023
≥52nd
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1073899670 · Medical Physician Assistant

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1073899670
  • ENUM-MID 2011
  • TAX-MID 41K Medical Physician
  • MIPS-ABOVE 87.1/100
  • RX-LIGHT 470
  • BOOK-LIGHT 3,806 in New York
  • PHOTO-FINISH Roland Szemerei · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Jessica Carey, RPA-C's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

87 ≥ 52nd percentile 52% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Jessica Carey, RPA-C sits

This provider among medical physician assistant peers

Across the 7,147 medical physician assistant providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Jessica Carey, RPA-C writes more Part D claims than 58% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 51% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Jessica Carey, RPA-C, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 51
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one medical physician assistant peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Jessica Carey, RPA-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Jessica Carey, RPA-C?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 10/26/2011

NPI 1073899670

Primary specialty

Medical Physician Assistant

Mid-sized

40,580 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

470 56% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,077

MIPS final score

87.1/100 3.6 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in New York

How Medical Physician Assistant compares to other specialties among New York providers

New York providers
Student in an Organized Heal…7.8%Registered Nurse5.2%Clinical Social Worker4.9%Social Worker4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist4.5%Licensed Practical Nurse4.3%Medical Physician Assistant0.7%
Largest specialties in New York (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Jessica Carey, RPA-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Medical Physician Assistant national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
87.1/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%87.1%
MIPS final score (Medical Physician Assistant) - 87.1/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

85 HIGH ST
Buffalo, NY 14203
(716) 630-1000

Provider Details

NPI 1073899670
Specialty Medical Physician Assistant
Credentials RPA-C
Gender Female
NPI Issued 10/26/2011

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

87.1456
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
82.2914
Quality
74.8605
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

License & disciplinary context - New York NYSBPMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~100K New York medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Jessica Carey, RPA-C. To verify Jessica Carey, RPA-C's current license status, search the NYSBPMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

312
Total board actions, New York 2023
Across 302 cases
3.12
Actions per 1,000 licensees
New York statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
89 cases

NYSBPMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the New York disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

470
Total Claims
$28K
Total Drug Cost
133
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
486
Total Day Supply
11,032
Generic Drug Cost
$10K
Opioid Claims
30 (6.4% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
32

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
78.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.02
Gender Split
65% female / 35% male
Age Distribution
<65: 12, 65-74: 35, 75-84: 45, 85+: 41

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Jessica Carey, RPA-C prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Atorvastatin Calcium
 18
Furosemide
 16
Metoprolol Succinate
 13
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
12
Eliquis
Apixaban
11
Prednisone
 11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Medical Physician Assistant in NY → All providers in New York → Compare specialties →

Medical Physician Assistant Overview

How Jessica Carey, RPA-C fits within the Medical Physician Assistant landscape nationally.

40,580
Medical Physician Assistant Providers in US
55
States with Medical Physician Assistant
1,077
Avg Claims per Provider

Jessica Carey, RPA-C's 470 claims are below the specialty average of 1,077.

Nationwide Medical Physician Assistant peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Carey, both outside New York so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (87.1 here).

Holly Baker 87.1 FL Esther Carson 87.2 OR Drew Lakey 87.2 OR Roland Szemerei 87.1 OR

Same NPPES enumeration year (2011)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Rachel Lawson Battle Creek, MI Keith Harris Schofield Barracks, HI Amy Miceli Phoenix, AZ Lisa Williams Johnstown, PA

Nearby Medical Physician Assistant Providers in New York

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in New York, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Carey.

One of 3,806 Medical Physician Assistant providers enrolled in New York, 5 are shown here.

Dr. Yesid Abad
PA C
New York, NY
Dr. Vincent Abanilla
PA-C
Brooklyn, NY
Dr. Stella Abayeva
P.A.
Forest Hills, NY
Dr. Amina Abdela
PA-C
Latham, NY
Dr. Hanan Abdelrahman
PA-C
Brooklyn, NY

Compare Medical Physician Assistant nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Jessica Carey, RPA-C's specialty? ▼
Jessica Carey, RPA-C specializes in Medical Physician Assistant and practices in Buffalo, New York. Credentials: RPA-C.
How much does Jessica Carey, RPA-C prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2023, Jessica Carey, RPA-C wrote 470 Medicare Part D claims totaling $28K in drug costs for 133 beneficiaries.
What is Jessica Carey, RPA-C's Medicare quality score? ▼
Jessica Carey, RPA-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 87.1/100 (Quality: 82.3, Cost: 74.9). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Jessica Carey, RPA-C located? ▼
Jessica Carey, RPA-C is located at 85 HIGH ST, Buffalo, NY, 14203. Phone: (716) 630-1000.
What is Jessica Carey, RPA-C's NPI number? ▼
Jessica Carey, RPA-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1073899670, issued on 10/26/2011.
Does Jessica Carey, RPA-C prescribe opioids? ▼
Yes, Jessica Carey, RPA-C had 30 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 6.4%.
How many Medical Physician Assistant providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 40,580 Medical Physician Assistant providers across 55 states in the US. The average Medical Physician Assistant provider writes 1,077 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Jessica Carey, RPA-C prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Jessica Carey, RPA-C's most frequently prescribed drugs include Atorvastatin Calcium, Furosemide, Metoprolol Succinate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Jessica Carey, RPA-C accept Medicare? ▼
Jessica Carey, RPA-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 470 Part D claims and 133 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Jessica Carey, RPA-C's credentials? ▼
Jessica Carey, RPA-C's NPI is 1073899670 with credentials RPA-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.