2026 NPPES data Primary Care Nurse Practitioner NPI 1598214348 DNP
Verify on CMS →

Jessica La Mar, DNP

Primary Care Nurse Practitioner in Madison, Wisconsin. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 10,138 in Primary Care Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 221 beneficiaries · Primary Care Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
0%
generic claims · 66% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
77.4/100
▼ 6 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$16.98
1 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Jessica La Mar, DNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 77.4/100 - below the 83.1 national average - and filed 1,506 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

77.4/100
MIPS score · -6 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2023
0%
generic prescribing
$16.98
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Jessica La Mar, DNP's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

77 24th percentile higher than 24% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Jessica La Mar, DNP sits

This provider among primary care nurse practitioner peers

Across the 958 primary care nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Jessica La Mar, DNP writes more Part D claims than 68% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 23% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Jessica La Mar, DNP-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one primary care nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Jessica La Mar, DNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Jessica La Mar, DNP?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 09/21/2016

NPI 1598214348

Primary specialty

Primary Care Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

10,138 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,506 10% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,363

MIPS final score

77.4/100 5.7 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Wisconsin

How Primary Care Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Wisconsin providers

Wisconsin providers
Physical Therapist - 5.6%Physical Therapist5.6%Pharmacist - 4.8%Pharmacist4.8%Registered Nurse - 4.5%Registered Nurse4.5%Professional Counselor - 3.3%Professional Counselor3.3%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 3.3%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program3.3%Family Medicine Physician - 3.2%Family Medicine Physician3.2%Primary Care Nurse Practitioner - 0.1%Primary Care Nurse Practitioner0.1%
Largest specialties in Wisconsin (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Jessica La Mar, DNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Primary Care Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
77.4/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Primary Care Nurse Practitioner) - 77.4/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%77.4%
MIPS final score (Primary Care Nurse Practitioner) - 77.4/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Jessica La Mar, DNP appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Primary Care Nurse Practitioner provider holding DNP credentials at 600 HIGHLAND AVE, Madison, WI, 53792, with a listed phone of (608) 263-7203. NPI 1598214348 was issued on 09/21/2016. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what La Mar most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 1,506 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 221 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $1.9 million in drug spend, split 66% brand-name and 0% generic by claim count. These figures capture only Medicare Part D, commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 77.4/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 81.8, Cost 62.1), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Primary Care Nurse Practitioner is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 10,138 enrolled providers across 54 states and an average of 1,363 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

600 HIGHLAND AVE
Madison, WI 53792

Provider Details

NPI 1598214348
Specialty Primary Care Nurse Practitioner
Credentials DNP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 09/21/2016

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

77.4384
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
81.8371
Quality
62.1241
Cost
77
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Jessica La Mar, DNP bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

University OF Wisconsin Medical Foundation Inc
Madison, WI

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Jessica La Mar, DNP. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$17

Largest payer

GENZYME CORPORATION

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Brand-heavy

Jessica La Mar, DNP - brand share 66.0%
Primary Care Nurse Practitioner average

66% brand-name claims vs 0% generic, on 1,506 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

1,506
Total Claims
$1.9M
Total Drug Cost
221
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
2,110
Total Day Supply
57,208
Brand vs Generic
66% brand / 0% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$1.9M
Antibiotic Claims
198

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
68.5 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.78
Gender Split
60% female / 40% male
Age Distribution
<65: 46, 65-74: 108, 75-84: 51, 85+: 16

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Jessica La Mar, DNP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa
Albuterol Sulfate
168
Trelegy Ellipta
Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter
146
Azithromycin
133
Prednisone
117
Anoro Ellipta
Umeclidinium Brm/Vilanterol Tr
108
Advair Diskus
Fluticasone Propion/Salmeterol
68
Symbicort
Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate
61
Breo Ellipta
Fluticasone/Vilanterol
54
Advair Hfa
Fluticasone Propion/Salmeterol
49
Fluticasone-Salmeterol
Fluticasone Propion/Salmeterol
46

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Primary Care Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Jessica La Mar, DNP fits within the Primary Care Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

10,138
Primary Care Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
54
States with Primary Care Nurse Practitioner
1,363
Avg Claims per Provider

Jessica La Mar, DNP's 1,506 claims are above the specialty average of 1,363.

Nearby Primary Care Nurse Practitioner Providers in Wisconsin

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Wisconsin, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as La Mar.

Compare Primary Care Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Wisconsin medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Primary Care Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Jessica La Mar, DNP's specialty?
Jessica La Mar, DNP specializes in Primary Care Nurse Practitioner and practices in Madison, Wisconsin. Credentials: DNP.
How much does Jessica La Mar, DNP prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Jessica La Mar, DNP wrote 1,506 Medicare Part D claims totaling $1.9M in drug costs for 221 beneficiaries.
What is Jessica La Mar, DNP's Medicare quality score?
Jessica La Mar, DNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 77.4/100 (Quality: 81.8, Cost: 62.1). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Jessica La Mar, DNP located?
Jessica La Mar, DNP is located at 600 HIGHLAND AVE, Madison, WI, 53792. Phone: (608) 263-7203.
What is Jessica La Mar, DNP's NPI number?
Jessica La Mar, DNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1598214348, issued on 09/21/2016.
Does Jessica La Mar, DNP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Jessica La Mar, DNP's prescribing is 66% brand-name and 0% generic drugs by claim count, with $1.9M in brand drug costs.
How many Primary Care Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 10,138 Primary Care Nurse Practitioner providers across 54 states in the US. The average Primary Care Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,363 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Jessica La Mar, DNP prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Jessica La Mar, DNP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Albuterol Sulfate Hfa, Trelegy Ellipta, Azithromycin. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Jessica La Mar, DNP accept Medicare?
Jessica La Mar, DNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,506 Part D claims and 221 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Jessica La Mar, DNP's credentials?
Jessica La Mar, DNP's NPI is 1598214348 with credentials DNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.