2026 NPPES data Advanced Practice Midwife NPI 1508054438 CNM
Verify on CMS →

Johanna Swift, CNM

Advanced Practice Midwife in Rutland, Vermont.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 10,937 in Advanced Practice Midwife, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
440
Medicare Part D claims · 55 beneficiaries · Advanced Practice Midwife avg: 99
Generic prescribing
63%
generic claims · 37% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
33.3/100
▼ 50 pts below national avg 83.1 · Below average
Industry payments
$125.54
4 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Johanna Swift, CNM reported a CMS MIPS final score of 33.3/100 - below the 83.1 national average - and filed 440 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

33.3/100
MIPS score · -50 vs avg
440
Part D claims, 2023
63%
generic prescribing
$125.54
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Johanna Swift, CNM's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

33 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). This entry sits in this band. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Johanna Swift, CNM sits

This provider among advanced practice midwife peers

Across the 572 advanced practice midwife providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Johanna Swift, CNM writes more Part D claims than 97% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 0% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Johanna Swift, CNM-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one advanced practice midwife peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Johanna Swift, CNM. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Johanna Swift, CNM?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 10/04/2007

NPI 1508054438

Primary specialty

Advanced Practice Midwife

Mid-sized

10,937 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

440 344% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 99

MIPS final score

33.3/100 49.8 pts vs avg

Below average band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Vermont

How Advanced Practice Midwife compares to other specialties among Vermont providers

Vermont providers
Mental Health Counselor - 9.5%Mental Health Counselor9.5%Clinical Social Worker - 7.8%Clinical Social Worker7.8%Physical Therapist - 5.6%Physical Therapist5.6%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 5.6%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5.6%Pharmacist - 3.8%Pharmacist3.8%Family Medicine Physician - 2.8%Family Medicine Physician2.8%Advanced Practice Midwife - 0.5%Advanced Practice Midwife0.5%
Largest specialties in Vermont (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Johanna Swift, CNM's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Advanced Practice Midwife national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
33.3/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Advanced Practice Midwife) - 33.3/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%33.3%
MIPS final score (Advanced Practice Midwife) - 33.3/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Johanna Swift, CNM appears in the CMS NPPES registry as an Advanced Practice Midwife provider holding CNM credentials at 199 STRATTON RD, Rutland, VT, 05701, with a listed phone of (802) 775-7798. NPI 1508054438 was issued on 10/04/2007.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 440 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 55 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $182K in drug spend, split 37% brand-name and 63% generic by claim count. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 33.3/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 8.5, Cost 60.7), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Advanced Practice Midwife is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 10,937 enrolled providers across 55 states and an average of 99 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

199 STRATTON RD
Rutland, VT 05701

Provider Details

NPI 1508054438
Specialty Advanced Practice Midwife
Credentials CNM
Gender Female
NPI Issued 10/04/2007

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

33.2678
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
8.5137
Quality
60.7124
Cost
0
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Johanna Swift, CNM. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$126

Largest payer

Alkermes, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

Johanna Swift, CNM - brand share 37.0%
Advanced Practice Midwife average

37% brand-name claims vs 63% generic, on 440 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

440
Total Claims
$182K
Total Drug Cost
55
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
444
Total Day Supply
9,256
Brand vs Generic
37% brand / 63% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$154K
Generic Drug Cost
$28K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
52.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.24
Gender Split
58% female / 42% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Johanna Swift, CNM prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Buprenorphine-Naloxone
Buprenorphine Hcl/Naloxone Hcl
195
Suboxone
Buprenorphine Hcl/Naloxone Hcl
57
Sublocade
Buprenorphine
51
Zubsolv
Buprenorphine Hcl/Naloxone Hcl
42
Clonidine Hcl
18
Clonazepam
11
Nicotrol
Nicotine
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Advanced Practice Midwife Overview

How Johanna Swift, CNM fits within the Advanced Practice Midwife landscape nationally.

10,937
Advanced Practice Midwife Providers in US
55
States with Advanced Practice Midwife
99
Avg Claims per Provider

Johanna Swift, CNM's 440 claims are above the specialty average of 99.

Nearby Advanced Practice Midwife Providers in Vermont

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Vermont, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Swift.

Compare Advanced Practice Midwife nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Vermont medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Advanced Practice Midwife peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Johanna Swift, CNM's specialty?
Johanna Swift, CNM specializes in Advanced Practice Midwife and practices in Rutland, Vermont. Credentials: CNM.
How much does Johanna Swift, CNM prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Johanna Swift, CNM wrote 440 Medicare Part D claims totaling $182K in drug costs for 55 beneficiaries.
What is Johanna Swift, CNM's Medicare quality score?
Johanna Swift, CNM has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 33.3/100 (Quality: 8.5, Cost: 60.7). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Johanna Swift, CNM located?
Johanna Swift, CNM is located at 199 STRATTON RD, Rutland, VT, 05701. Phone: (802) 775-7798.
What is Johanna Swift, CNM's NPI number?
Johanna Swift, CNM's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1508054438, issued on 10/04/2007.
Does Johanna Swift, CNM prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Johanna Swift, CNM's prescribing is 37% brand-name and 63% generic drugs by claim count, with $154K in brand drug costs.
How many Advanced Practice Midwife providers are there in the US?
There are 10,937 Advanced Practice Midwife providers across 55 states in the US. The average Advanced Practice Midwife provider writes 99 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Johanna Swift, CNM prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Johanna Swift, CNM's most frequently prescribed drugs include Buprenorphine-Naloxone, Suboxone, Sublocade. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Johanna Swift, CNM accept Medicare?
Johanna Swift, CNM appears in CMS Medicare data with 440 Part D claims and 55 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Johanna Swift, CNM's credentials?
Johanna Swift, CNM's NPI is 1508054438 with credentials CNM. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.