2026 NPPES data Internal Medicine Physician NPI 1992899256 MD
Verify on CMS →

John Wang, MD

Internal Medicine Physician in Flushing, New York. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 172,858 in Internal Medicine Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
164
Medicare Part D claims · 62 beneficiaries · Internal Medicine Physician avg: 3K
Generic prescribing
30%
generic claims · 70% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
20.4/100
▼ 63 pts below national avg 83.1 · Below average
Industry payments
$19.52
1 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

John Wang, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 20.4/100 — below the 83.1 national average — and filed 164 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

20.4/100
MIPS score · -63 vs avg
164
Part D claims, 2023
30%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

John Wang, MD's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

20 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). This entry sits in this band. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where John Wang, MD sits

This provider among internal medicine physician peers

Across the 36,260 internal medicine physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, John Wang, MD writes more Part D claims than 20% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 2% — placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 95Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80John Wang, MD — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one internal medicine physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is John Wang, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic — not verified)

John Wang, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting — signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about John Wang, MD?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 10/03/2006

NPI 1992899256

Primary specialty

Internal Medicine Physician

High-volume

172,858 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

164 94% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 2,716

MIPS final score

20.4/100 62.7 pts vs avg

Below average band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in New York

How Internal Medicine Physician compares to other specialties among New York providers

New York providers

Largest specialties in New York (% of in-state providers)

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 7.8%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program7.8%Registered Nurse — 5.2%Registered Nurse5.2%Clinical Social Worker — 4.9%Clinical Social Worker4.9%Social Worker — 4.5%Social Worker4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist — 4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist4.5%Licensed Practical Nurse — 4.3%Licensed Practical Nurse4.3%Internal Medicine Physician — 2.6%Internal Medicine Physician2.6%
Largest specialties in New York (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

John Wang, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Internal Medicine Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
20.4/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Internal Medicine Physician) — 20.4/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%20.4%
MIPS final score (Internal Medicine Physician) — 20.4/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

John Wang, MD appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Internal Medicine Physician provider holding MD credentials at 3808 UNION ST STE 3F, Flushing, NY, 11354, with a listed phone of (347) 248-6841. NPI 1992899256 was issued on 10/03/2006. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Wang most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 164 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 62 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $7K in drug spend, split 70% brand-name and 30% generic by claim count. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 20.4/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 0, Cost 68.1), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Internal Medicine Physician is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 172,858 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 2,716 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

3808 UNION ST STE 3F
Flushing, NY 11354

Provider Details

NPI 1992899256
Specialty Internal Medicine Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 10/03/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

20.4327
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
0
Quality
68.109
Cost

Reporting: Individual

Industry payments received (2024) — CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for John Wang, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$20

Largest payer

Smith+Nephew, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias — they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context — New York NYSBPMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~100K New York medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to John Wang, MD. To verify John Wang, MD's current license status, search the NYSBPMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

312
Total board actions, New York 2023
Across 302 cases
3.12
Actions per 1,000 licensees
New York statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
89 cases

NYSBPMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the New York disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Brand-heavy

John Wang, MD — brand share 70.0%
Internal Medicine Physician average

70% brand-name claims vs 30% generic, on 164 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

164
Total Claims
$7K
Total Drug Cost
62
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
164
Total Day Supply
1,755
Brand vs Generic
70% brand / 30% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$6K
Generic Drug Cost
$1K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
82.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.59
Gender Split
71% female / 29% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Silver Sulfadiazine
107
Mupirocin
31

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Internal Medicine Physician Overview

How John Wang, MD fits within the Internal Medicine Physician landscape nationally.

172,858
Internal Medicine Physician Providers in US
56
States with Internal Medicine Physician
2,716
Avg Claims per Provider

John Wang, MD's 164 claims are below the specialty average of 2,716.

Nearby Internal Medicine Physician Providers in New York

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in New York, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Wang.

Compare Internal Medicine Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the New York medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Internal Medicine Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is John Wang, MD's specialty?
John Wang, MD specializes in Internal Medicine Physician and practices in Flushing, New York. Credentials: MD.
How much does John Wang, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, John Wang, MD wrote 164 Medicare Part D claims totaling $7K in drug costs for 62 beneficiaries.
What is John Wang, MD's Medicare quality score?
John Wang, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 20.4/100 (Quality: 0, Cost: 68.1). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is John Wang, MD located?
John Wang, MD is located at 3808 UNION ST STE 3F, Flushing, NY, 11354. Phone: (347) 248-6841.
What is John Wang, MD's NPI number?
John Wang, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1992899256, issued on 10/03/2006.
Does John Wang, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
John Wang, MD's prescribing is 70% brand-name and 30% generic drugs by claim count, with $6K in brand drug costs.
How many Internal Medicine Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 172,858 Internal Medicine Physician providers across 56 states in the US. The average Internal Medicine Physician provider writes 2,716 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does John Wang, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, John Wang, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Silver Sulfadiazine, Mupirocin. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does John Wang, MD accept Medicare?
John Wang, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 164 Part D claims and 62 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify John Wang, MD's credentials?
John Wang, MD's NPI is 1992899256 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.