2026 NPPES data Family Nurse Practitioner NPI 1578068094 DNP
Verify on CMS →

Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP

Family Nurse Practitioner in Seattle, Washington.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 210,832 in Family Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
786
Medicare Part D claims · 120 beneficiaries · Family Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
75%
generic claims · 25% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
93.1/100
▲ 10 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional

What the federal data shows

Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 93.1/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 786 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

93.1/100
MIPS score · +10 vs avg
786
Part D claims, 2023
75%
generic prescribing
≥69th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1578068094), first enumerated 03/27/2018.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 786 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 93.1/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    Washington statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: WMC annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1578068094 · Family Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1578068094
  • ENUM-RECENT 2018
  • TAX-MEGA 211K Family Nurse
  • MIPS-ABOVE 93.1/100
  • RX-LIGHT 786
  • BOOK-LIGHT 3,090 in Washington
  • PHOTO-FINISH Anne Thomas · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

93 ≥ 69th percentile 69% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP sits

This provider among family nurse practitioner peers

Across the 26,556 family nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP writes more Part D claims than 64% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 71% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100022.344.666.989.3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 64 · MIPS quality, percentile: 71
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one family nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 03/27/2018

NPI 1578068094

Primary specialty

Family Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

210,832 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

786 36% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,222

MIPS final score

93.1/100 9.6 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Washington

How Family Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Washington providers

Washington providers
Mental Health Counselor8.6%Massage Therapist6.5%Counselor5.7%Behavior Technician4.5%Pharmacist4%Physical Therapist3.6%Family Nurse Practitioner1.5%
Largest specialties in Washington (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Family Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
93.1/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%93.1%
MIPS final score (Family Nurse Practitioner) - 93.1/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

1100 9TH AVE
Seattle, WA 98101

Provider Details

NPI 1578068094
Specialty Family Nurse Practitioner
Credentials DNP
Gender Male
NPI Issued 03/27/2018

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

93.0932
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
73.9573
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Virginia Mason Medical Center
★★★★★ 5/5
Seattle, WA
Acute Care Hospitals
CMS CCN: 500005

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

License & disciplinary context - Washington WMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~34K Washington medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP. To verify Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP's current license status, search the WMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

88
Total board actions, Washington 2023
Across 85 cases
2.59
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Washington statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
31 cases

WMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Washington disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP - brand share 25.0%
Family Nurse Practitioner average

25% brand-name claims vs 75% generic, on 786 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

786
Total Claims
$816K
Total Drug Cost
120
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
1,880
Total Day Supply
56,165
Brand vs Generic
25% brand / 75% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$795K
Generic Drug Cost
$20K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
68.5 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.91
Gender Split
53% female / 47% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Metoprolol Succinate
104
Camzyos
Mavacamten
78
Eliquis
Apixaban
55
Verapamil Er
Verapamil Hcl
41
Spironolactone
40
Atorvastatin Calcium
37
Amlodipine Besylate
36
Furosemide
35
Lisinopril
35
Losartan Potassium
35

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Family Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP fits within the Family Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

210,832
Family Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Family Nurse Practitioner
1,222
Avg Claims per Provider

Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP's 786 claims are below the specialty average of 1,222.

Nationwide Family Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Medina-Beckwith, both outside Washington so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (93.1 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2018)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Family Nurse Practitioner Providers in Washington

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Washington, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Medina-Beckwith.

One of 3,090 Family Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Washington, 5 are shown here.

Compare Family Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP's specialty?
Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP specializes in Family Nurse Practitioner and practices in Seattle, Washington. Credentials: DNP.
How much does Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP wrote 786 Medicare Part D claims totaling $816K in drug costs for 120 beneficiaries.
What is Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP's Medicare quality score?
Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 93.1/100 (Quality: 74). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP located?
Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP is located at 1100 9TH AVE, Seattle, WA, 98101. Phone: (206) 341-1111.
What is Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP's NPI number?
Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1578068094, issued on 03/27/2018.
Does Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP's prescribing is 25% brand-name and 75% generic drugs by claim count, with $795K in brand drug costs.
How many Family Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 210,832 Family Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Family Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,222 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Metoprolol Succinate, Camzyos, Eliquis. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP accept Medicare?
Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 786 Part D claims and 120 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP's credentials?
Jonathan Medina-Beckwith, DNP's NPI is 1578068094 with credentials DNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.