PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist NPI 1396133237 ARNP,NP-C
Verify on CMS →

Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C

Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist in Hialeah, Florida.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 574 in Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
302
Medicare Part D claims · 156 beneficiaries · Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
91%
generic claims · 9% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
93.7/100
▲ 10 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 93.7/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 302 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

93.7/100
MIPS score · +10 vs avg
302
Part D claims, 2024
91%
generic prescribing
≥69th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1396133237), first enumerated 12/30/2014.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 302 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 93.7/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    Florida statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: FLDOH annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1396133237 · Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-ELITE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1396133237
  • ENUM-MID 2014
  • TAX-NARROW 574
  • MIPS-ELITE 93.7/100
  • RX-LIGHT 302
  • BOOK-THIN 67 in Florida
  • PHOTO-FINISH Kim Halaquist, FNP · ±0.3

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

94 ≥ 69th percentile 69% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C sits

This provider among family health clinical nurse specialist peers

Across the 50 family health clinical nurse specialist providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C writes more Part D claims than 42% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 76% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.749.474.098.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 16 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 96 · MIPS quality, percentile: 84Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 41 · MIPS quality, percentile: 61Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 94Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 31 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 6 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 29Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 31Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 69 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 29 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 59 · MIPS quality, percentile: 94Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 14Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 86 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 84 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 39 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 51 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 14 · MIPS quality, percentile: 69Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 76Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 49Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 59Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 24 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 49 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 61 · MIPS quality, percentile: 86Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 4Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 39Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 76 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 31Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 6 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 41Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 94 · MIPS quality, percentile: 16Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 6Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 94Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 71 · MIPS quality, percentile: 71Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 4 · MIPS quality, percentile: 94Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 24Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 51Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 76
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one family health clinical nurse specialist peer from a representative sample of 49; the gold marker is Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 12/30/2014

NPI 1396133237

Primary specialty

Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist

Niche

574 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

302 80% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,492

MIPS final score

93.7/100 10.2 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Florida

How Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist compares to other specialties among Florida providers

Florida providers
Behavior Technician16.3%Mental Health Counselor4.8%Family Nurse Practitioner4.5%Pharmacist4.1%Student in an Organized Heal…4.1%Physical Therapist3%Family Health Clinical Nurse…0%
Largest specialties in Florida (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
93.7/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%93.7%
MIPS final score (Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist) - 93.7/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

8325 NW 194TH TER
Hialeah, FL 33015
(305) 301-7833

Provider Details

NPI 1396133237
Specialty Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist
Credentials ARNP,NP-C
Gender Male
NPI Issued 12/30/2014

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

93.7454
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
83.537
Quality
76
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Public Health Trust OF Miami Dade County Florida
Miami, FL

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

License & disciplinary context - Florida FLDOH 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~75K Florida medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C. To verify Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C's current license status, search the FLDOH public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

480
Total board actions, Florida 2023
Across 467 cases
6.40
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Florida statewide rate
monetary fine
Most common action type
138 cases

FLDOH publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Florida disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C - brand share 9.0%
Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist average

9% brand-name claims vs 91% generic, on 302 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

302
Total Claims
$4K
Total Drug Cost
156
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
303.667
Total Day Supply
3,366
Brand vs Generic
9% brand / 91% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$884
Generic Drug Cost
$3K
Antibiotic Claims
48

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
70.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.62
Gender Split
67% female / 33% male
Age Distribution
<65: 23, 65-74: 83, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Ibuprofen
 58
Methylprednisolone
 37
Baclofen
 31
Dexamethasone
 24
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa
Albuterol Sulfate
22
Cyclobenzaprine Hcl
 17
Cephalexin
 15
Lidocaine
 15
Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass
Amoxicillin/Potassium Clav
13

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist in FL → All providers in Florida → Compare specialties →

Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist Overview

How Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C fits within the Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist landscape nationally.

574
Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist Providers in US
48
States with Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist
1,492
Avg Claims per Provider

Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C's 302 claims are below the specialty average of 1,492.

Nationwide Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Russinyol, both outside Florida so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (93.7 here).

Kim Halaquist 94 NY Kristin Dehoux 94.1 VA Tara Hall 94.1 PA Sheena Bruenn 94.2 NY

Same NPPES enumeration year (2014)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Lois Pirozek Sioux City, IA Sharon Bowen Hollis, OK Lindsay Mason Mesa, AZ Jacqueline Allen Saint Louis, MO

Nearby Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist Providers in Florida

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Florida, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Russinyol.

One of 67 Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist providers enrolled in Florida, 5 are shown here.

Grethchen Abdulreda
ARNP
Hollywood, FL
Lou Ann Albano
ARNP
Lakeland, FL
Emely Arrieta-Smith
APRN
Jupiter, FL
Irina Arvanitidou
APRN
Hallandale Beach, FL
Jayar Banez
Brooksville, FL

Compare Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C's specialty? ▼
Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C specializes in Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist and practices in Hialeah, Florida. Credentials: ARNP,NP-C.
How much does Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C wrote 302 Medicare Part D claims totaling $4K in drug costs for 156 beneficiaries.
What is Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C's Medicare quality score? ▼
Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 93.7/100 (Quality: 83.5). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C located? ▼
Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C is located at 8325 NW 194TH TER, Hialeah, FL, 33015. Phone: (305) 301-7833.
What is Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C's NPI number? ▼
Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1396133237, issued on 12/30/2014.
Does Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs? ▼
Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C's prescribing is 9% brand-name and 91% generic drugs by claim count, with $884 in brand drug costs.
How many Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 574 Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist providers across 48 states in the US. The average Family Health Clinical Nurse Specialist provider writes 1,492 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C's most frequently prescribed drugs include Ibuprofen, Methylprednisolone, Baclofen. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C accept Medicare? ▼
Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 302 Part D claims and 156 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C's credentials? ▼
Jorge Russinyol, ARNP,NP-C's NPI is 1396133237 with credentials ARNP,NP-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.