2026 NPPES data Interventional Pain Medicine Physician NPI 1093700015 MD
Verify on CMS →

Julian Naranjo, MD

Interventional Pain Medicine Physician in Natchitoches, Louisiana.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 1,528 in Interventional Pain Medicine Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
7K
Medicare Part D claims · 1K beneficiaries · Interventional Pain Medicine Physician avg: 2K
Generic prescribing
94%
generic claims · 6% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
75/100
▼ 8 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$1.5K
31 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Julian Naranjo, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 75/100 - below the 83.1 national average - and filed 7,311 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

75/100
MIPS score · -8 vs avg
7K
Part D claims, 2023
94%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Julian Naranjo, MD's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

75 15th percentile higher than 15% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Julian Naranjo, MD sits

This provider among interventional pain medicine physician peers

Across the 546 interventional pain medicine physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Julian Naranjo, MD writes more Part D claims than 90% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 25% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Julian Naranjo, MD-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one interventional pain medicine physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Julian Naranjo, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Julian Naranjo, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Julian Naranjo, MD?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 09/15/2005

NPI 1093700015

Primary specialty

Interventional Pain Medicine Physician

Niche

1,528 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

7,311 233% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 2,197

MIPS final score

75/100 8.1 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Louisiana

How Interventional Pain Medicine Physician compares to other specialties among Louisiana providers

Louisiana providers
Case Manager/Care Coordinator - 9.6%Case Manager/Care Coordinator9.6%Mental Health Counselor - 7.3%Mental Health Counselor7.3%Behavior Technician - 5.3%Behavior Technician5.3%Pharmacist - 5.2%Pharmacist5.2%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5%Family Nurse Practitioner - 4.6%Family Nurse Practitioner4.6%Interventional Pain Medicine Physician - 0%Interventional Pain Medicine Physician0%
Largest specialties in Louisiana (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Julian Naranjo, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Interventional Pain Medicine Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
75/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Interventional Pain Medicine Physician) - 75/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%75%
MIPS final score (Interventional Pain Medicine Physician) - 75/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Julian Naranjo, MD appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Interventional Pain Medicine Physician provider holding MD credentials at 501 KEYSER AVE, Natchitoches, LA, 71457, with a listed phone of (318) 214-4153. NPI 1093700015 was issued on 09/15/2005.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 7,311 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 1,293 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $760K in drug spend, split 6% brand-name and 94% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 54.2%. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 75/100 for the 2023 performance year, compared with the national average of 83.1.

Interventional Pain Medicine Physician is a narrow specialty nationwide, with 1,528 enrolled providers across 53 states and an average of 2,197 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

501 KEYSER AVE
Natchitoches, LA 71457

Provider Details

NPI 1093700015
Specialty Interventional Pain Medicine Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 09/15/2005

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

75
Final Score
Avg: 83.1

Reporting: Individual

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Julian Naranjo, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$1.5K

Largest payer

Curonix LLC

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Julian Naranjo, MD - brand share 6.0%
Interventional Pain Medicine Physician average

6% brand-name claims vs 94% generic, on 7,311 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

7,311
Total Claims
$760K
Total Drug Cost
1,293
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
7,842
Total Day Supply
224,597
Brand vs Generic
6% brand / 94% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$392K
Generic Drug Cost
$368K
Opioid Claims
3,960 (54.2% rate)

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
69.8 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.28
Gender Split
62% female / 38% male
Age Distribution
<65: 326, 65-74: 530, 75-84: 343, 85+: 94

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Julian Naranjo, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen
Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen
1,749
Gabapentin
669
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
520
Oxycodone Hcl
441
Diclofenac Sodium
383
Tramadol Hcl
364
Pregabalin
313
Acetaminophen-Codeine
Acetaminophen With Codeine
273
Tizanidine Hcl
241
Baclofen
235

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Interventional Pain Medicine Physician Overview

How Julian Naranjo, MD fits within the Interventional Pain Medicine Physician landscape nationally.

1,528
Interventional Pain Medicine Physician Providers in US
53
States with Interventional Pain Medicine Physician
2,197
Avg Claims per Provider

Julian Naranjo, MD's 7,311 claims are above the specialty average of 2,197.

Nearby Interventional Pain Medicine Physician Providers in Louisiana

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Louisiana, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Naranjo.

Compare Interventional Pain Medicine Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Louisiana medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Interventional Pain Medicine Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Julian Naranjo, MD's specialty?
Julian Naranjo, MD specializes in Interventional Pain Medicine Physician and practices in Natchitoches, Louisiana. Credentials: MD.
How much does Julian Naranjo, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Julian Naranjo, MD wrote 7,311 Medicare Part D claims totaling $760K in drug costs for 1,293 beneficiaries.
What is Julian Naranjo, MD's Medicare quality score?
Julian Naranjo, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 75/100. The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Julian Naranjo, MD located?
Julian Naranjo, MD is located at 501 KEYSER AVE, Natchitoches, LA, 71457. Phone: (318) 214-4153.
What is Julian Naranjo, MD's NPI number?
Julian Naranjo, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1093700015, issued on 09/15/2005.
Does Julian Naranjo, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Julian Naranjo, MD's prescribing is 6% brand-name and 94% generic drugs by claim count, with $392K in brand drug costs.
Does Julian Naranjo, MD prescribe opioids?
Yes, Julian Naranjo, MD had 3,960 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 54.2%.
How many Interventional Pain Medicine Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 1,528 Interventional Pain Medicine Physician providers across 53 states in the US. The average Interventional Pain Medicine Physician provider writes 2,197 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Julian Naranjo, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Julian Naranjo, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Oxycodone-Acetaminophen, Gabapentin, Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Julian Naranjo, MD accept Medicare?
Julian Naranjo, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 7,311 Part D claims and 1,293 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Julian Naranjo, MD's credentials?
Julian Naranjo, MD's NPI is 1093700015 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.