2026 NPPES data Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist NPI 1942541107 APRN-CNS
Verify on CMS →

Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS

Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 1,376 in Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
114
Medicare Part D claims · 37 beneficiaries · Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
71%
generic claims · 29% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
71.7/100
▼ 12 pts below national avg 83.5 · Mid-tier

What the federal data shows

Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS reported a CMS MIPS final score of 71.7/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 114 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

71.7/100
MIPS score · -12 vs avg
114
Part D claims, 2024
71%
generic prescribing
≥9th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1942541107), first enumerated 03/12/2013.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 114 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 71.7/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1942541107 · Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-LOW · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1942541107
  • ENUM-MID 2013
  • TAX-NARROW 1,376
  • MIPS-LOW 71.7/100
  • RX-LIGHT 114
  • BOOK-THIN 31 in Oklahoma
  • PHOTO-FINISH Tammy Cost · ±0.1

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

72 ≥ 9th percentile 9% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS sits

This provider among adult health clinical nurse specialist peers

Across the 141 adult health clinical nurse specialist providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS writes more Part D claims than 22% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 14% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 14
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one adult health clinical nurse specialist peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 03/12/2013

NPI 1942541107

Primary specialty

Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist

Niche

1,376 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

114 91% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,202

MIPS final score

71.7/100 11.8 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Oklahoma

How Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist compares to other specialties among Oklahoma providers

Oklahoma providers
Case Manager/Care Coordinator9.6%Mental Health Counselor7%Behavior Technician6.6%Peer Specialist5.6%Counselor4.9%Student in an Organized Heal…4.2%Adult Health Clinical Nurse …0%
Largest specialties in Oklahoma (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
71.7/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%71.7%
MIPS final score (Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist) - 71.7/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

921 NE 13TH ST
Oklahoma City, OK 73104

Provider Details

NPI 1942541107
Specialty Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist
Credentials APRN-CNS
Gender Female
NPI Issued 03/12/2013

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

71.6668
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
53.4828
Quality
52.0733
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS - brand share 29.0%
Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist average

29% brand-name claims vs 71% generic, on 114 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

114
Total Claims
$27K
Total Drug Cost
37
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
170.333
Total Day Supply
5,001
Brand vs Generic
29% brand / 71% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$25K
Generic Drug Cost
$2K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
71.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.50
Gender Split
49% female / 51% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Atorvastatin Calcium
30
Eliquis
Apixaban
29

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist Overview

How Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS fits within the Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist landscape nationally.

1,376
Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist Providers in US
49
States with Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist
1,202
Avg Claims per Provider

Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS's 114 claims are below the specialty average of 1,202.

Nationwide Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Chainakul, both outside Oklahoma so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (71.7 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2013)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist Providers in Oklahoma

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Oklahoma, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Chainakul.

One of 31 Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist providers enrolled in Oklahoma, 5 are shown here.

Compare Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS's specialty?
Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS specializes in Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist and practices in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Credentials: APRN-CNS.
How much does Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS wrote 114 Medicare Part D claims totaling $27K in drug costs for 37 beneficiaries.
What is Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS's Medicare quality score?
Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 71.7/100 (Quality: 53.5, Cost: 52.1). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS located?
Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS is located at 921 NE 13TH ST, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104. Phone: (405) 456-2183.
What is Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS's NPI number?
Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1942541107, issued on 03/12/2013.
Does Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS's prescribing is 29% brand-name and 71% generic drugs by claim count, with $25K in brand drug costs.
How many Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist providers are there in the US?
There are 1,376 Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist providers across 49 states in the US. The average Adult Health Clinical Nurse Specialist provider writes 1,202 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS's most frequently prescribed drugs include Atorvastatin Calcium, Eliquis. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS accept Medicare?
Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS appears in CMS Medicare data with 114 Part D claims and 37 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS's credentials?
Juliane Chainakul, APRN-CNS's NPI is 1942541107 with credentials APRN-CNS. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.