Julie Kim
Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program in San Francisco, California.
This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 331,274 in Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.
Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File, 2023
What the federal data shows
Julie Kim reported a CMS MIPS final score of 91.9/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 263 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.
- 91.9/100
- MIPS score · +8 vs avg
- 263
- Part D claims, 2023
- 48%
- generic prescribing
- ≥61st
- pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)
Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.
CMS NPPES provider registry desk
NPI 1912341660 · Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program
NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-MID · PHOTO-FINISH
- NPI-10 1912341660
- ENUM-MID 2013
- TAX-MEGA 331K Student in
- MIPS-ABOVE 91.9/100
- RX-LIGHT 263
- BOOK-MID 46,496 in California
- PHOTO-FINISH Rebeccah Brusca · ±0.0
MIPS final-score neighbourhood
Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity
- Kim · this provi…
Kim · this provider
91.9 MIPS pts
- Erica Langnas · …
Erica Langnas
91.9 MIPS pts
- Rebeccah Brusca …
Rebeccah Brusca
91.9 MIPS pts
- Pooja Dharwadkar…
Pooja Dharwadkar
91.9 MIPS pts
- Kelly Han · near
Kelly Han
91.9 MIPS pts
What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).
Julie Kim's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.
92 ≥ 61st percentile 61% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.
Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023
Where Julie Kim sits
This provider among student in an organized health care education/training program peers
Across the 12,177 student in an organized health care education/training program providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Julie Kim writes more Part D claims than 52% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 63% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.
Each dot is one student in an organized health care education/training program peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Julie Kim. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.
What does the federal data show about Julie Kim?
High performer (top quartile)Primary specialty
Medicare Part D claims
MIPS final score
Specialty distribution in California
How Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program compares to other specialties among California providers
Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program ranks #3 among California's specialties (5% of in-state providers)
Each bar is a specialty's share of the California provider total, by primary NUCC taxonomy. The highlighted bar is Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program; the long tail of smaller specialties is omitted for legibility.
Medicare quality performance, MIPS
Julie Kim's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program national average
- MIPS Final Score
- 91.9/100
- vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
Quality benchmarks
- National MIPS avg 2023 measured reporting year
- Quality dim CMS Quality category
- Cost dim CMS Cost category
- Specialty volume Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program US NPIs
91.9/100 MIPS final score - 8.4 pts above the 83.5 national average
Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities composite score for the 2023 performance year. Specialty: Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program. Quality dim: 83.5. Cost dim: 68.
How MIPS and board certification work
The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.
Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).
Practice Address
Provider Details
| NPI | 1912341660 |
|---|---|
| Specialty | Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program |
| Gender | Female |
| NPI Issued | 04/24/2013 |
Verify this provider's license
PlainDoctor pulls this profile from the CMS NPPES public registry. Confirm Julie Kim's current license status, disciplinary history, and board certifications with the Medical Board of California in California before relying on this page for a clinical or care decision.
How we sourced this profile
Profile fields combine the CMS NPPES monthly snapshot (provider directory, taxonomy, and address) with calendar-year 2023 Medicare Part D and MIPS public-use files when records are present. NPI 1912341660 is the unique 10-digit identifier CMS uses to link Kim across every Medicare, Medicaid, and HIPAA-covered transaction. Read full methodology →
CMS Quality Score (MIPS)
Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.
Reporting: Group practice
Hospital and facility affiliations
Facilities where Julie Kim bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.
Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).
License & disciplinary context - California MBC 2023 annual report
Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~150K California medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Julie Kim. To verify Julie Kim's current license status, search the MBC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.
MBC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the California disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.
Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average
44% brand-name claims vs 48% generic, on 263 2023 Medicare Part D claims.
The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.
Medicare Part D Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.
Prescribing Breakdown
- 30-Day Fills
- 610
- Total Day Supply
- 18,047
- Brand vs Generic
- 44% brand / 48% generic
- Brand Drug Cost
- $138K
- Generic Drug Cost
- $5K
Patient Demographics
- Average Patient Age
- 66.8 years
- Avg HCC Risk Score
- 1.32
- Gender Split
- 54% female / 46% male
- Age Distribution
- <65: 22, 65-74: 36, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A
Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)
Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.
What Julie Kim prescribes most
Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023
- Levothyroxine Sodium
Levothyroxine Sodium
35 claims
- Methimazole
Methimazole
21 claims
- Ozempic
Ozempic
17 claims
- Ezetimibe
Ezetimibe
14 claims
- Atorvastatin Calcium 12
Atorvastatin Calcium
12 claims
- Metformin Hcl Er 12
Metformin Hcl Er
12 claims
| Drug | Claims |
|---|---|
| Levothyroxine Sodium | 35 |
| Methimazole | 21 |
| Ozempic Semaglutide | 17 |
| Ezetimibe | 14 |
| Atorvastatin Calcium | 12 |
| Metformin Hcl Er Metformin Hcl | 12 |
| Basaglar Kwikpen U-100 "Insulin Glargine | N/A |
| Nano 2nd Gen Pen Needle "Pen Needle | N/A |
* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.
Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Overview
How Julie Kim fits within the Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program landscape nationally.
Julie Kim's 263 claims are below the specialty average of 459.
Nationwide Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year
Two federal-record peer sets for Kim, both outside California so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.
Similar MIPS final score
Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (91.9 here).
Same NPPES enumeration year (2013)
Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.
Nearby Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Providers in California
Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in California, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Kim.
One of 46,496 Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program providers enrolled in California, 5 are shown here.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Julie Kim's specialty? ▼
How much does Julie Kim prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
What is Julie Kim's Medicare quality score? ▼
Where is Julie Kim located? ▼
What is Julie Kim's NPI number? ▼
Does Julie Kim prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs? ▼
How many Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program providers are there in the US? ▼
What drugs does Julie Kim prescribe most often? ▼
Does Julie Kim accept Medicare? ▼
How can I verify Julie Kim's credentials? ▼
Data Sources
View source datasets and methodology notes
- Provider Directory
- CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
- Specialty Classification
- NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
- Prescribing Data
- CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
- Quality Performance
- CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
- Limitations
- Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.
See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.
Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology
Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.
Published by
PlainDoctor
Independent public-data reference that compiles, verifies, and contextualizes official datasets. We do not accept compensation from entities we cover, and every dataset cites its originating public source.