PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Nurse Practitioner NPI 1811002827 ARNP
Verify on CMS →

Julie Vining, ARNP

Nurse Practitioner in Tampa, Florida.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 89,808 in Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
210
Medicare Part D claims · 131 beneficiaries · Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
61%
generic claims · 30% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
32.4/100
▼ 51 pts below national avg 83.5 · Below average
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Julie Vining, ARNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 32.4/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 210 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

32.4/100
MIPS score · -51 vs avg
210
Part D claims, 2024
61%
generic prescribing
≥3rd
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Julie Vining, ARNP

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1811002827), first enumerated 08/20/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 210 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 32.4/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    Florida statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Julie Vining, ARNP's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: FLDOH annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1811002827 · Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-LOW · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-MID · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1811002827
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-MEGA 90K Nurse Practitioner
  • MIPS-LOW 32.4/100
  • RX-LIGHT 210
  • BOOK-MID 8,544 in Florida
  • PHOTO-FINISH Debora Dowda, FNP, APN · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Julie Vining, ARNP's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

32 ≥ 3rd percentile 3% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). This entry sits in this band. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Julie Vining, ARNP sits

This provider among nurse practitioner peers

Across the 13,205 nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Julie Vining, ARNP writes more Part D claims than 36% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 1% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Julie Vining, ARNP, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 36 · MIPS quality, percentile: 1
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Julie Vining, ARNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Julie Vining, ARNP?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/20/2006

NPI 1811002827

Primary specialty

Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

89,808 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

210 82% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,144

MIPS final score

32.4/100 51.1 pts vs avg

Below average band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Florida

How Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Florida providers

Florida providers
Behavior Technician16.3%Mental Health Counselor4.8%Family Nurse Practitioner4.5%Pharmacist4.1%Student in an Organized Heal…4.1%Physical Therapist3%Nurse Practitioner1.8%
Largest specialties in Florida (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Julie Vining, ARNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
32.4/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%32.4%
MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) - 32.4/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

400 N TAMPA ST FL 15
Tampa, FL 33602
(888) 803-3370

Provider Details

NPI 1811002827
Specialty Nurse Practitioner
Credentials ARNP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 08/20/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

32.414
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
20.6184
Quality
62.4282
Cost
0
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

License & disciplinary context - Florida FLDOH 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~75K Florida medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Julie Vining, ARNP. To verify Julie Vining, ARNP's current license status, search the FLDOH public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

480
Total board actions, Florida 2023
Across 467 cases
6.40
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Florida statewide rate
monetary fine
Most common action type
138 cases

FLDOH publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Florida disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

Julie Vining, ARNP - brand share 30.0%
Nurse Practitioner average

30% brand-name claims vs 61% generic, on 210 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

210
Total Claims
$27K
Total Drug Cost
131
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
308.3
Total Day Supply
6,668
Brand vs Generic
30% brand / 61% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$23K
Generic Drug Cost
$3K
Antibiotic Claims
30

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
68.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
0.94
Gender Split
63% female / 37% male
Age Distribution
<65: 27, 65-74: 76, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Julie Vining, ARNP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Paxlovid
Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir
25
Ondansetron Hcl
 22
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro
Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst
17
Paxlovid (Eua)
Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir
13
Trelegy Ellipta
Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter
13

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Nurse Practitioner in FL → All providers in Florida → Compare specialties →

Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Julie Vining, ARNP fits within the Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

89,808
Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Nurse Practitioner
1,144
Avg Claims per Provider

Julie Vining, ARNP's 210 claims are below the specialty average of 1,144.

Nationwide Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Vining, both outside Florida so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (32.4 here).

Debora Dowda 32.4 TN Leslie Rogers 32.4 ID Ashley Whitney 32.8 CO Laura Pace 31.9 AR

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Cecile Jimenez Annapolis, MD Kathleen White Charleston, SC Kellie McLain Charleston, SC Annette Kibler Charleston, SC

Nearby Nurse Practitioner Providers in Florida

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Florida, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Vining.

One of 8,544 Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Florida, 5 are shown here.

Zenis Aballe Hoyos
Fort Myers, FL
Mario Aballe Mosqueda
Naples, FL
Mariela Abarca
Miami, FL
Fawaz Abass
APRN, AGNP-C
Orlando, FL
Julie Abbate
ARNP
Boca Raton, FL

Compare Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Julie Vining, ARNP's specialty? ▼
Julie Vining, ARNP specializes in Nurse Practitioner and practices in Tampa, Florida. Credentials: ARNP.
How much does Julie Vining, ARNP prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Julie Vining, ARNP wrote 210 Medicare Part D claims totaling $27K in drug costs for 131 beneficiaries.
What is Julie Vining, ARNP's Medicare quality score? ▼
Julie Vining, ARNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 32.4/100 (Quality: 20.6, Cost: 62.4). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Julie Vining, ARNP located? ▼
Julie Vining, ARNP is located at 400 N TAMPA ST FL 15, Tampa, FL, 33602. Phone: (888) 803-3370.
What is Julie Vining, ARNP's NPI number? ▼
Julie Vining, ARNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1811002827, issued on 08/20/2006.
Does Julie Vining, ARNP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs? ▼
Julie Vining, ARNP's prescribing is 30% brand-name and 61% generic drugs by claim count, with $23K in brand drug costs.
How many Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 89,808 Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,144 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Julie Vining, ARNP prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Julie Vining, ARNP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Paxlovid, Ondansetron Hcl, Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Julie Vining, ARNP accept Medicare? ▼
Julie Vining, ARNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 210 Part D claims and 131 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Julie Vining, ARNP's credentials? ▼
Julie Vining, ARNP's NPI is 1811002827 with credentials ARNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.