PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Women's Health Nurse Practitioner NPI 1356742233 DNP
Verify on CMS →

Jutta Deininger, DNP

Women's Health Nurse Practitioner in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 9,754 in Women's Health Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
1K
Medicare Part D claims · 243 beneficiaries · Women's Health Nurse Practitioner avg: 269
Generic prescribing
93%
generic claims · 7% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
80.5/100
▼ 3 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$96.8
1 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Jutta Deininger, DNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 80.5/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 1,000 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

80.5/100
MIPS score · -3 vs avg
1K
Part D claims, 2024
93%
generic prescribing
$96.8
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Jutta Deininger, DNP

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1356742233), first enumerated 09/10/2014.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 1,000 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 80.5/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $96.8 in reported industry payments (1 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    Michigan statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Jutta Deininger, DNP's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: MI-BOM annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1356742233 · Women's Health Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-INLINE · RX-MID · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1356742233
  • ENUM-MID 2014
  • TAX-MID 10K Women's Health
  • MIPS-INLINE 80.5/100
  • RX-MID 1,000
  • BOOK-THIN 185 in Michigan
  • PHOTO-FINISH Ashley Boehrig, MSN,… · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Jutta Deininger, DNP's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

81 ≥ 30th percentile 30% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Jutta Deininger, DNP sits

This provider among women's health nurse practitioner peers

Across the 795 women's health nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Jutta Deininger, DNP writes more Part D claims than 94% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 31% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Jutta Deininger, DNP, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 94 · MIPS quality, percentile: 31
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one women's health nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Jutta Deininger, DNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Jutta Deininger, DNP?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 09/10/2014

NPI 1356742233

Primary specialty

Women's Health Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

9,754 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,000 272% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 269

MIPS final score

80.5/100 3 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Michigan

How Women's Health Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Michigan providers

Michigan providers
Behavior Technician22.2%Clinical Social Worker5.7%Student in an Organized Heal…3.7%Social Worker3.3%Physical Therapist3.3%Pharmacist2.9%Women's Health Nurse Practit…0.1%
Largest specialties in Michigan (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Jutta Deininger, DNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Women's Health Nurse Practitioner national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
80.5/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%80.5%
MIPS final score (Women's Health Nurse Practitioner) - 80.5/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

3100 PROFESSIONAL DR
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
(734) 973-0710

Provider Details

NPI 1356742233
Specialty Women's Health Nurse Practitioner
Credentials DNP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 09/10/2014

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

80.4671
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
66.2426
Quality
68.6477
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Jutta Deininger, DNP. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$97

Largest payer

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - Michigan MI-BOM 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~41K Michigan medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Jutta Deininger, DNP. To verify Jutta Deininger, DNP's current license status, search the MI-BOM public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

123
Total board actions, Michigan 2023
Across 120 cases
3.00
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Michigan statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
44 cases

MI-BOM publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Michigan disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Jutta Deininger, DNP - brand share 7.0%
Women's Health Nurse Practitioner average

7% brand-name claims vs 93% generic, on 1,000 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

1,000
Total Claims
$386K
Total Drug Cost
243
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
2,126.933
Total Day Supply
61,177
Brand vs Generic
7% brand / 93% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$358K
Generic Drug Cost
$28K
Opioid Claims
27 (2.7% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
17

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
71.8 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.86
Age Distribution
<65: 31, 65-74: 112, 75-84: 83, 85+: 17

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Jutta Deininger, DNP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Anastrozole
 316
Letrozole
 95
Tamoxifen Citrate
 94
Exemestane
 58
Gabapentin
 49
Alendronate Sodium
 37
Ondansetron Hcl
 25
Duloxetine Hcl
 24
Potassium Chloride
 21
Veozah
Fezolinetant
13

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Women's Health Nurse Practitioner in MI → All providers in Michigan → Compare specialties →

Women's Health Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Jutta Deininger, DNP fits within the Women's Health Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

9,754
Women's Health Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
55
States with Women's Health Nurse Practitioner
269
Avg Claims per Provider

Jutta Deininger, DNP's 1,000 claims are above the specialty average of 269.

Nationwide Women's Health Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Deininger, both outside Michigan so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (80.5 here).

Ashley Boehrig 80.5 WI Jamie Neary 80.5 WI Meghan Ritchie 80.5 WI Lauren Schmick 80.2 WI

Same NPPES enumeration year (2014)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Jennifer Rust Springfield, OH Faith Tiver-Foran Las Vegas, NV Debralee Pasek Columbus, OH Mary Acosta Shreveport, LA

Nearby Women's Health Nurse Practitioner Providers in Michigan

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Michigan, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Deininger.

One of 185 Women's Health Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Michigan, 5 are shown here.

Nadina Abdurahmanovic
WHNP-BC
Rochester Hills, MI
Abbey Alsip
NP
Ann Arbor, MI
Jennifer Annetta
NP-C
Royal Oak, MI
Mackenzie Arnold
WHNP, CNP, APN
Kalamazoo, MI
Jewell Barnard
MSN, WHNP, IBCLC
Grayling, MI

Compare Women's Health Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Jutta Deininger, DNP's specialty? ▼
Jutta Deininger, DNP specializes in Women's Health Nurse Practitioner and practices in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Credentials: DNP.
How much does Jutta Deininger, DNP prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Jutta Deininger, DNP wrote 1,000 Medicare Part D claims totaling $386K in drug costs for 243 beneficiaries.
What is Jutta Deininger, DNP's Medicare quality score? ▼
Jutta Deininger, DNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 80.5/100 (Quality: 66.2, Cost: 68.6). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Jutta Deininger, DNP located? ▼
Jutta Deininger, DNP is located at 3100 PROFESSIONAL DR, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104. Phone: (734) 973-0710.
What is Jutta Deininger, DNP's NPI number? ▼
Jutta Deininger, DNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1356742233, issued on 09/10/2014.
Does Jutta Deininger, DNP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs? ▼
Jutta Deininger, DNP's prescribing is 7% brand-name and 93% generic drugs by claim count, with $358K in brand drug costs.
Does Jutta Deininger, DNP prescribe opioids? ▼
Yes, Jutta Deininger, DNP had 27 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 2.7%.
How many Women's Health Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 9,754 Women's Health Nurse Practitioner providers across 55 states in the US. The average Women's Health Nurse Practitioner provider writes 269 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Jutta Deininger, DNP prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Jutta Deininger, DNP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Anastrozole, Letrozole, Tamoxifen Citrate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Jutta Deininger, DNP accept Medicare? ▼
Jutta Deininger, DNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,000 Part D claims and 243 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Jutta Deininger, DNP's credentials? ▼
Jutta Deininger, DNP's NPI is 1356742233 with credentials DNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.