PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse NPI 1265170443
Verify on CMS →

Kendal Gerkovich

Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse in Kansas City, Kansas.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 6,929 in Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
40
Medicare Part D claims · 13 beneficiaries · Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse avg: 832
MIPS score
91.9/100
▲ 8 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Kendal Gerkovich reported a CMS MIPS final score of 91.9/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 40 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

91.9/100
MIPS score · +8 vs avg
40
Part D claims, 2024
≥61st
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Kendal Gerkovich

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1265170443), first enumerated 05/26/2022.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 40 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 91.9/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1265170443 · Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MID · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-TRACE · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1265170443
  • ENUM-RECENT 2022
  • TAX-MID 7K Critical Care
  • MIPS-ABOVE 91.9/100
  • RX-TRACE 40
  • BOOK-THIN 88 in Kansas
  • PHOTO-FINISH Kimberly Segna · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Kendal Gerkovich's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

92 ≥ 61st percentile 61% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Kendal Gerkovich sits

This provider among critical care medicine registered nurse peers

Across the 184 critical care medicine registered nurse providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Kendal Gerkovich writes more Part D claims than 16% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 68% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Kendal Gerkovich, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 16 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one critical care medicine registered nurse peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Kendal Gerkovich. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Kendal Gerkovich?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 05/26/2022

NPI 1265170443

Primary specialty

Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse

Mid-sized

6,929 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

40 95% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 832

MIPS final score

91.9/100 8.4 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Kansas

How Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse compares to other specialties among Kansas providers

Kansas providers
Behavior Technician7%Social Worker4.9%Physical Therapist4.8%Pharmacist4.7%Family Nurse Practitioner3.9%Clinical Social Worker3.8%Critical Care Medicine Regis…0.2%
Largest specialties in Kansas (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Kendal Gerkovich's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
91.9/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%91.9%
MIPS final score (Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse) - 91.9/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

3825 CAMBRIDGE ST
Kansas City, KS 66103
(913) 588-5000

Provider Details

NPI 1265170443
Specialty Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse
Gender Female
NPI Issued 05/26/2022

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

91.8902
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
75.1734
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Kendal Gerkovich bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Kansas University Physicians Inc
Kansas City, KS

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

40
Total Claims
$7K
Total Drug Cost
13
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
71.967
Total Day Supply
2,035
Generic Drug Cost
$434

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
68.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.81

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Atorvastatin Calcium
 16

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse in KS → All providers in Kansas → Compare specialties →

Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse Overview

How Kendal Gerkovich fits within the Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse landscape nationally.

6,929
Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse Providers in US
53
States with Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse
832
Avg Claims per Provider

Kendal Gerkovich's 40 claims are below the specialty average of 832.

Nationwide Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Gerkovich, both outside Kansas so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (91.9 here).

Kimberly Segna 91.9 CA Hei Nam Wong 92 TX Oksana Koeppen 91.8 IL Jennifer Gros 92.1 UT

Same NPPES enumeration year (2022)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Briana Mino Columbus, OH Thomas Shadaya Detroit, MI Teresa Musket Johnson City, TN Patrick Metke Chicago, IL

Nearby Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse Providers in Kansas

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Kansas, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Gerkovich.

One of 88 Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse providers enrolled in Kansas, 5 are shown here.

Ekerette Akpan
RN
Wichita, KS
Amber Allen
RN
Wichita, KS
Gwendolyn Allen
RN
Horton, KS
Taylor Anvik
Kansas City, KS
Kelsey Austin
Wichita, KS

Compare Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Kendal Gerkovich's specialty? ▼
Kendal Gerkovich specializes in Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse and practices in Kansas City, Kansas.
How much does Kendal Gerkovich prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Kendal Gerkovich wrote 40 Medicare Part D claims totaling $7K in drug costs for 13 beneficiaries.
What is Kendal Gerkovich's Medicare quality score? ▼
Kendal Gerkovich has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 91.9/100 (Quality: 75.2). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Kendal Gerkovich located? ▼
Kendal Gerkovich is located at 3825 CAMBRIDGE ST, Kansas City, KS, 66103. Phone: (913) 588-5000.
What is Kendal Gerkovich's NPI number? ▼
Kendal Gerkovich's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1265170443, issued on 05/26/2022.
How many Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 6,929 Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse providers across 53 states in the US. The average Critical Care Medicine Registered Nurse provider writes 832 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Kendal Gerkovich prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Kendal Gerkovich's most frequently prescribed drugs include Atorvastatin Calcium. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Kendal Gerkovich accept Medicare? ▼
Kendal Gerkovich appears in CMS Medicare data with 40 Part D claims and 13 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Kendal Gerkovich's credentials? ▼
Kendal Gerkovich's NPI is 1265170443. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.