2026 NPPES data Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist NPI 1902892599 O.D., F.A.A.O.
Verify on CMS →

Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O.

Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist in Virginia Beach, Virginia.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 1,548 in Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
238
Medicare Part D claims · 42 beneficiaries · Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist avg: 235
Generic prescribing
31%
generic claims · 69% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
75.9/100
▼ 8 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$433.77
8 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 75.9/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 238 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

75.9/100
MIPS score · -8 vs avg
238
Part D claims, 2023
31%
generic prescribing
$433.77
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O.'s MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

76 ≥ 15th percentile 15% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O. sits

This provider among corneal and contact management optometrist peers

Across the 144 corneal and contact management optometrist providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O. writes more Part D claims than 37% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 22% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O., Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one corneal and contact management optometrist peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O.?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 09/20/2005

NPI 1902892599

Primary specialty

Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist

Niche

1,548 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

238 1% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 235

MIPS final score

75.9/100 7.6 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Virginia

How Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist compares to other specialties among Virginia providers

Virginia providers
Behavior Technician5.2%Clinical Social Worker5.1%Student in an Organized Heal…4.7%Physical Therapist4.6%Pharmacist4.5%Professional Counselor4%Corneal and Contact Manageme…0%
Largest specialties in Virginia (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
75.9/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist) - 75.9/100 vs national avg 83.5

0%100%National avg84%75.9%
MIPS final score (Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist) - 75.9/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O. appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist provider holding O.D., F.A.A.O. credentials at 345 EDWIN DR, Virginia Beach, VA, 23462, with a listed phone of (757) 497-5555. NPI 1902892599 was issued on 09/20/2005.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 238 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 42 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $82K in drug spend, split 69% brand-name and 31% generic by claim count. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 75.9/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 100, Cost 19.7), compared with the 83.5 average among clinicians with a measured score.

Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist is a narrow specialty nationwide, with 1,548 enrolled providers across 52 states and an average of 235 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

345 EDWIN DR
Virginia Beach, VA 23462

Provider Details

NPI 1902892599
Specialty Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist
Credentials O.D., F.A.A.O.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 09/20/2005

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

75.9064
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
100
Quality
19.688
Cost

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O.. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$434

Largest payer

Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Brand-heavy

Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O. - brand share 69.0%
Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist average

69% brand-name claims vs 31% generic, on 238 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

238
Total Claims
$82K
Total Drug Cost
42
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
350
Total Day Supply
9,976
Brand vs Generic
69% brand / 31% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$74K
Generic Drug Cost
$7K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
0.80
Gender Split
60% female / 40% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Lumigan
Bimatoprost
39
Rocklatan
Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost
31
Cyclosporine
17
Brinzolamide
15
Latanoprost
15
Restasis
Cyclosporine
13
Timolol Maleate
13
Travoprost
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist Overview

How Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O. fits within the Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist landscape nationally.

1,548
Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist Providers in US
52
States with Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist
235
Avg Claims per Provider

Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O.'s 238 claims are above the specialty average of 235.

Nearby Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist Providers in Virginia

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Virginia, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Lebow.

Compare Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Virginia medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O.'s specialty?
Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O. specializes in Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist and practices in Virginia Beach, Virginia. Credentials: O.D., F.A.A.O..
How much does Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O. prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O. wrote 238 Medicare Part D claims totaling $82K in drug costs for 42 beneficiaries.
What is Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O.'s Medicare quality score?
Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 75.9/100 (Quality: 100, Cost: 19.7). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O. located?
Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O. is located at 345 EDWIN DR, Virginia Beach, VA, 23462. Phone: (757) 497-5555.
What is Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O.'s NPI number?
Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1902892599, issued on 09/20/2005.
Does Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O. prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O.'s prescribing is 69% brand-name and 31% generic drugs by claim count, with $74K in brand drug costs.
How many Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist providers are there in the US?
There are 1,548 Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist providers across 52 states in the US. The average Corneal and Contact Management Optometrist provider writes 235 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O. prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Lumigan, Rocklatan, Cyclosporine. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O. accept Medicare?
Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O. appears in CMS Medicare data with 238 Part D claims and 42 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O.'s credentials?
Kenneth Lebow, O.D., F.A.A.O.'s NPI is 1902892599 with credentials O.D., F.A.A.O.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.