2026 NPPES data Dermatology Physician NPI 1871593244 MD
Verify on CMS →

Kim Panzarella, MD

Dermatology Physician in Colonial Heights, Virginia.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 15,011 in Dermatology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 711 beneficiaries · Dermatology Physician avg: 799
Generic prescribing
94%
generic claims · 6% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
65.2/100
▼ 18 pts below national avg 83.5 · Mid-tier
Industry payments
$325.36
16 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Kim Panzarella, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 65.2/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 2,122 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

65.2/100
MIPS score · -18 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2024
94%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Kim Panzarella, MD

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1871593244), first enumerated 07/28/2005.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 2,122 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 65.2/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $325.36 in reported industry payments (16 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1871593244 · Dermatology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-MID · MIPS-LOW · RX-MID · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1871593244
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2005
  • TAX-MID 15K Dermatology Physician
  • MIPS-LOW 65.2/100
  • RX-MID 2,122
  • BOOK-THIN 402 in Virginia
  • PHOTO-FINISH Adam Perry, M.D. · ±0.1

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Kim Panzarella, MD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

65 ≥ 7th percentile 7% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). This entry sits in this band. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Kim Panzarella, MD sits

This provider among dermatology physician peers

Across the 5,700 dermatology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Kim Panzarella, MD writes more Part D claims than 95% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 12% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100023.647.370.994.5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Kim Panzarella, MD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one dermatology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Kim Panzarella, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Kim Panzarella, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Kim Panzarella, MD?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/28/2005

NPI 1871593244

Primary specialty

Dermatology Physician

Mid-sized

15,011 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

2,122 166% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 799

MIPS final score

65.2/100 18.3 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Virginia

How Dermatology Physician compares to other specialties among Virginia providers

Virginia providers
Behavior Technician5.5%Clinical Social Worker5.2%Student in an Organized Heal…4.7%Physical Therapist4.6%Pharmacist4.4%Professional Counselor4%Dermatology Physician0.3%
Largest specialties in Virginia (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Kim Panzarella, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Dermatology Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
65.2/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%65.2%
MIPS final score (Dermatology Physician) - 65.2/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

280 CHARLES H DIMMOCK PKWY STE 4
Colonial Heights, VA 23834

Provider Details

NPI 1871593244
Specialty Dermatology Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Female
NPI Issued 07/28/2005

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

65.2427
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
77.1511
Quality
90.3245
Cost
0
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Kim Panzarella, MD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Dermatology Associates OF Richmond PC
Richmond, VA

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Kim Panzarella, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$325

Largest payer

Janssen Biotech, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Kim Panzarella, MD - brand share 6.0%
Dermatology Physician average

6% brand-name claims vs 94% generic, on 2,122 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

2,122
Total Claims
$395K
Total Drug Cost
711
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
2,506.867
Total Day Supply
66,679
Brand vs Generic
6% brand / 94% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$331K
Generic Drug Cost
$64K
Opioid Claims
17 (0.8% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
253

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
75.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.08
Gender Split
63% female / 37% male
Age Distribution
<65: 25, 65-74: 310, 75-84: 291, 85+: 85

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Kim Panzarella, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Clobetasol Propionate
320
Triamcinolone Acetonide
239
Ketoconazole
141
Hydrocortisone
102
Doxycycline Monohydrate
89
Fluorouracil
85
Doxycycline Hyclate
80
Ammonium Lactate
71
Metronidazole
64
Hydroxyzine Hcl
61

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Dermatology Physician Overview

How Kim Panzarella, MD fits within the Dermatology Physician landscape nationally.

15,011
Dermatology Physician Providers in US
53
States with Dermatology Physician
799
Avg Claims per Provider

Kim Panzarella, MD's 2,122 claims are above the specialty average of 799.

Nationwide Dermatology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Panzarella, both outside Virginia so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (65.2 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2005)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Dermatology Physician Providers in Virginia

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Virginia, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Panzarella.

One of 402 Dermatology Physician providers enrolled in Virginia, 5 are shown here.

Compare Dermatology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Kim Panzarella, MD's specialty?
Kim Panzarella, MD specializes in Dermatology Physician and practices in Colonial Heights, Virginia. Credentials: MD.
How much does Kim Panzarella, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Kim Panzarella, MD wrote 2,122 Medicare Part D claims totaling $395K in drug costs for 711 beneficiaries.
What is Kim Panzarella, MD's Medicare quality score?
Kim Panzarella, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 65.2/100 (Quality: 77.2, Cost: 90.3). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Kim Panzarella, MD located?
Kim Panzarella, MD is located at 280 CHARLES H DIMMOCK PKWY STE 4, Colonial Heights, VA, 23834. Phone: (804) 549-4030.
What is Kim Panzarella, MD's NPI number?
Kim Panzarella, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1871593244, issued on 07/28/2005.
Does Kim Panzarella, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Kim Panzarella, MD's prescribing is 6% brand-name and 94% generic drugs by claim count, with $331K in brand drug costs.
Does Kim Panzarella, MD prescribe opioids?
Yes, Kim Panzarella, MD had 17 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 0.8%.
How many Dermatology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 15,011 Dermatology Physician providers across 53 states in the US. The average Dermatology Physician provider writes 799 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Kim Panzarella, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Kim Panzarella, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Clobetasol Propionate, Triamcinolone Acetonide, Ketoconazole. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Kim Panzarella, MD accept Medicare?
Kim Panzarella, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 2,122 Part D claims and 711 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Kim Panzarella, MD's credentials?
Kim Panzarella, MD's NPI is 1871593244 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.