2026 NPPES data General Practice Registered Nurse NPI 1184297624
Verify on CMS →

Kyle Bailey

General Practice Registered Nurse in West Chester, Ohio.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 5,532 in General Practice Registered Nurse, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
1K
Medicare Part D claims · 131 beneficiaries · General Practice Registered Nurse avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
78%
generic claims · 22% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
78.8/100
▼ 4 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$259.37
14 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Kyle Bailey reported a CMS MIPS final score of 78.8/100 - below the 83.1 national average - and filed 1,405 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

78.8/100
MIPS score · -4 vs avg
1K
Part D claims, 2023
78%
generic prescribing
$259.37
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Kyle Bailey's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

79 27th percentile higher than 27% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Kyle Bailey sits

This provider among general practice registered nurse peers

Across the 134 general practice registered nurse providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Kyle Bailey writes more Part D claims than 72% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 31% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Kyle Bailey-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 31
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one general practice registered nurse peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Kyle Bailey. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Kyle Bailey?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/22/2021

NPI 1184297624

Primary specialty

General Practice Registered Nurse

Mid-sized

5,532 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,405 18% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,187

MIPS final score

78.8/100 4.3 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Ohio

How General Practice Registered Nurse compares to other specialties among Ohio providers

Ohio providers
Case Manager/Care Coordinator - 10.9%Case Manager/Care Coordinator10.9%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 4.7%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program4.7%Licensed Practical Nurse - 4%Licensed Practical Nurse4%Addiction (Substance Use Disorder) Counselor - 3.5%Addiction (Substance Use Disorder) Counselor3.5%Registered Nurse - 3.4%Registered Nurse3.4%Pharmacist - 3.4%Pharmacist3.4%General Practice Registered Nurse - 0.1%General Practice Registered Nurse0.1%
Largest specialties in Ohio (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Kyle Bailey's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the General Practice Registered Nurse national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
78.8/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (General Practice Registered Nurse) - 78.8/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%78.8%
MIPS final score (General Practice Registered Nurse) - 78.8/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Kyle Bailey appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a General Practice Registered Nurse provider at 7675 WELLNESS WAY, West Chester, OH, 45069, with a listed phone of (513) 475-8521. NPI 1184297624 was issued on 07/22/2021.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 1,405 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 131 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $468K in drug spend, split 22% brand-name and 78% generic by claim count. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 78.8/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 70.4, Cost 58.9), compared with the national average of 83.1.

General Practice Registered Nurse is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 5,532 enrolled providers across 55 states and an average of 1,187 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

7675 WELLNESS WAY
West Chester, OH 45069

Provider Details

NPI 1184297624
Specialty General Practice Registered Nurse
Gender Male
NPI Issued 07/22/2021

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

78.7894
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
70.4288
Quality
58.8691
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Kyle Bailey. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$259

Largest payer

E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - Ohio OMB 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~48K Ohio medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Kyle Bailey. To verify Kyle Bailey's current license status, search the OMB public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

158
Total board actions, Ohio 2023
Across 154 cases
3.29
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Ohio statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
56 cases

OMB publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Ohio disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Kyle Bailey - brand share 22.0%
General Practice Registered Nurse average

22% brand-name claims vs 78% generic, on 1,405 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

1,405
Total Claims
$468K
Total Drug Cost
131
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
2,242
Total Day Supply
66,296
Brand vs Generic
22% brand / 78% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$445K
Generic Drug Cost
$23K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
68.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
3.76
Gender Split
52% female / 48% male
Age Distribution
<65: 42, 65-74: 56, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Kyle Bailey prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Metoprolol Succinate
145
Torsemide
127
Spironolactone
119
Entresto
Sacubitril/Valsartan
116
Atorvastatin Calcium
101
Valsartan
91
Carvedilol
90
Furosemide
80
Jardiance
Empagliflozin
68
Eplerenone
53

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

General Practice Registered Nurse Overview

How Kyle Bailey fits within the General Practice Registered Nurse landscape nationally.

5,532
General Practice Registered Nurse Providers in US
55
States with General Practice Registered Nurse
1,187
Avg Claims per Provider

Kyle Bailey's 1,405 claims are above the specialty average of 1,187.

Nearby General Practice Registered Nurse Providers in Ohio

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Ohio, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Bailey.

Compare General Practice Registered Nurse nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Ohio medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby General Practice Registered Nurse peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Kyle Bailey's specialty?
Kyle Bailey specializes in General Practice Registered Nurse and practices in West Chester, Ohio.
How much does Kyle Bailey prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Kyle Bailey wrote 1,405 Medicare Part D claims totaling $468K in drug costs for 131 beneficiaries.
What is Kyle Bailey's Medicare quality score?
Kyle Bailey has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 78.8/100 (Quality: 70.4, Cost: 58.9). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Kyle Bailey located?
Kyle Bailey is located at 7675 WELLNESS WAY, West Chester, OH, 45069. Phone: (513) 475-8521.
What is Kyle Bailey's NPI number?
Kyle Bailey's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1184297624, issued on 07/22/2021.
Does Kyle Bailey prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Kyle Bailey's prescribing is 22% brand-name and 78% generic drugs by claim count, with $445K in brand drug costs.
How many General Practice Registered Nurse providers are there in the US?
There are 5,532 General Practice Registered Nurse providers across 55 states in the US. The average General Practice Registered Nurse provider writes 1,187 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Kyle Bailey prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Kyle Bailey's most frequently prescribed drugs include Metoprolol Succinate, Torsemide, Spironolactone. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Kyle Bailey accept Medicare?
Kyle Bailey appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,405 Part D claims and 131 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Kyle Bailey's credentials?
Kyle Bailey's NPI is 1184297624. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.