2026 NPPES data Gerontology Nurse Practitioner NPI 1689155004 APRN
Verify on CMS →

Laura Saskal, APRN

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner in West Haven, Connecticut.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 10,056 in Gerontology Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
4K
Medicare Part D claims · 151 beneficiaries · Gerontology Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
83%
generic claims · 15% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
90.7/100
▲ 7 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional

What the federal data shows

Laura Saskal, APRN reported a CMS MIPS final score of 90.7/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 3,589 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

90.7/100
MIPS score · +7 vs avg
4K
Part D claims, 2024
83%
generic prescribing
≥58th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Laura Saskal, APRN

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1689155004), first enumerated 08/23/2018.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 3,589 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 90.7/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1689155004 · Gerontology Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MID · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-MID · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1689155004
  • ENUM-RECENT 2018
  • TAX-MID 10K Gerontology Nurse
  • MIPS-ABOVE 90.7/100
  • RX-MID 3,589
  • BOOK-THIN 146 in Connecticut
  • PHOTO-FINISH Wellah Marie San Bue… · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Laura Saskal, APRN's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

91 ≥ 58th percentile 58% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Laura Saskal, APRN sits

This provider among gerontology nurse practitioner peers

Across the 1,256 gerontology nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Laura Saskal, APRN writes more Part D claims than 91% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 62% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100023.146.269.392.4Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Laura Saskal, APRN, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 91 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one gerontology nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Laura Saskal, APRN. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Laura Saskal, APRN?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/23/2018

NPI 1689155004

Primary specialty

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

10,056 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

3,589 166% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,350

MIPS final score

90.7/100 7.2 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Connecticut

How Gerontology Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Connecticut providers

Connecticut providers
Clinical Social Worker8.4%Student in an Organized Heal…7.9%Physical Therapist4.2%Pharmacist3.9%Internal Medicine Physician3.4%Mental Health Counselor3.2%Gerontology Nurse Practition…0.2%
Largest specialties in Connecticut (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Laura Saskal, APRN's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Gerontology Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
90.7/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%90.7%
MIPS final score (Gerontology Nurse Practitioner) - 90.7/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

1 CELLINI PL STE 102
West Haven, CT 06516

Provider Details

NPI 1689155004
Specialty Gerontology Nurse Practitioner
Credentials APRN
Gender Female
NPI Issued 08/23/2018

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

90.7483
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
82.2742
Quality
58.9275
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Laura Saskal, APRN bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

United Community And Family Services, Inc
Norwich, CT

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Laura Saskal, APRN - brand share 15.0%
Gerontology Nurse Practitioner average

15% brand-name claims vs 83% generic, on 3,589 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

3,589
Total Claims
$348K
Total Drug Cost
151
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
5,740.533
Total Day Supply
161,998
Brand vs Generic
15% brand / 83% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$303K
Generic Drug Cost
$41K
Opioid Claims
74 (2.1% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
25

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
64.7 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.64
Gender Split
66% female / 34% male
Age Distribution
<65: 57, 65-74: 63, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Laura Saskal, APRN prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Levothyroxine Sodium
171
Gabapentin
161
Lisinopril
161
Atorvastatin Calcium
141
Metformin Hcl
115
Pantoprazole Sodium
113
Amlodipine Besylate
110
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa
Albuterol Sulfate
103
Montelukast Sodium
102
Fluticasone Propionate
85

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Laura Saskal, APRN fits within the Gerontology Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

10,056
Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
54
States with Gerontology Nurse Practitioner
1,350
Avg Claims per Provider

Laura Saskal, APRN's 3,589 claims are above the specialty average of 1,350.

Nationwide Gerontology Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Saskal, both outside Connecticut so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (90.7 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2018)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Gerontology Nurse Practitioner Providers in Connecticut

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Connecticut, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Saskal.

One of 146 Gerontology Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Connecticut, 5 are shown here.

Compare Gerontology Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Laura Saskal, APRN's specialty?
Laura Saskal, APRN specializes in Gerontology Nurse Practitioner and practices in West Haven, Connecticut. Credentials: APRN.
How much does Laura Saskal, APRN prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Laura Saskal, APRN wrote 3,589 Medicare Part D claims totaling $348K in drug costs for 151 beneficiaries.
What is Laura Saskal, APRN's Medicare quality score?
Laura Saskal, APRN has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 90.7/100 (Quality: 82.3, Cost: 58.9). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Laura Saskal, APRN located?
Laura Saskal, APRN is located at 1 CELLINI PL STE 102, West Haven, CT, 06516. Phone: (203) 932-6481.
What is Laura Saskal, APRN's NPI number?
Laura Saskal, APRN's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1689155004, issued on 08/23/2018.
Does Laura Saskal, APRN prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Laura Saskal, APRN's prescribing is 15% brand-name and 83% generic drugs by claim count, with $303K in brand drug costs.
Does Laura Saskal, APRN prescribe opioids?
Yes, Laura Saskal, APRN had 74 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 2.1%.
How many Gerontology Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 10,056 Gerontology Nurse Practitioner providers across 54 states in the US. The average Gerontology Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,350 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Laura Saskal, APRN prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Laura Saskal, APRN's most frequently prescribed drugs include Levothyroxine Sodium, Gabapentin, Lisinopril. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Laura Saskal, APRN accept Medicare?
Laura Saskal, APRN appears in CMS Medicare data with 3,589 Part D claims and 151 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Laura Saskal, APRN's credentials?
Laura Saskal, APRN's NPI is 1689155004 with credentials APRN. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.