2026 NPPES data Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program NPI 1982159711
Verify on CMS →

Laura Shook

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program in Seattle, Washington. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 331,761 in Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
98
Medicare Part D claims · 69 beneficiaries · Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program avg: 459
MIPS score
91.6/100
▲ 8 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Laura Shook reported a CMS MIPS final score of 91.6/100 — above the 83.1 national average — and filed 98 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

91.6/100
MIPS score · +8 vs avg
98
Part D claims, 2023

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Laura Shook's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

92 Top 37% higher than 63% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Laura Shook sits

This provider among student in an organized health care education/training program peers

Across the 12,645 student in an organized health care education/training program providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Laura Shook writes more Part D claims than 25% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 64% — placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 95Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Laura Shook — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 64
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one student in an organized health care education/training program peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Laura Shook. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Laura Shook?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/22/2016

NPI 1982159711

Primary specialty

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program

High-volume

331,761 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

98 79% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 459

MIPS final score

91.6/100 8.5 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Washington

How Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program compares to other specialties among Washington providers

Washington providers

Largest specialties in Washington (% of in-state providers)

Mental Health Counselor — 8.6%Mental Health Counselor8.6%Massage Therapist — 6.5%Massage Therapist6.5%Counselor — 5.7%Counselor5.7%Behavior Technician — 4.5%Behavior Technician4.5%Pharmacist — 4%Pharmacist4%Physical Therapist — 3.6%Physical Therapist3.6%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 3.4%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program3.4%
Largest specialties in Washington (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Laura Shook's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
91.6/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program) — 91.6/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%91.6%
MIPS final score (Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program) — 91.6/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Laura Shook appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program provider at HARBORVIEW MEDICAL CENTER, Seattle, WA, 98104, with a listed phone of (206) 744-8334. NPI 1982159711 was issued on 08/22/2016. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Shook most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 98 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 69 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $2K in drug spend, with an opioid prescribing rate of 11.2%. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 91.6/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 85.1), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 331,761 enrolled providers across 55 states and an average of 459 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

HARBORVIEW MEDICAL CENTER
Seattle, WA 98104

Provider Details

NPI 1982159711
Specialty Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program
Gender Female
NPI Issued 08/22/2016

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

91.5901
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
85.0511
Quality
96.8817
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Laura Shook bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" — a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Brown Calvanese Cameron Ltd
Reno, NV

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

License & disciplinary context — Washington WMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~34K Washington medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Laura Shook. To verify Laura Shook's current license status, search the WMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

88
Total board actions, Washington 2023
Across 85 cases
2.59
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Washington statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
31 cases

WMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Washington disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

98
Total Claims
$2K
Total Drug Cost
69
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
98
Total Day Supply
1,035
Generic Drug Cost
$914
Opioid Claims
11 (11.2% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
46

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
69.1 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.63
Gender Split
72% female / 28% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Cephalexin
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Overview

How Laura Shook fits within the Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program landscape nationally.

331,761
Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Providers in US
55
States with Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program
459
Avg Claims per Provider

Laura Shook's 98 claims are below the specialty average of 459.

Nearby Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Providers in Washington

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Washington, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Shook.

Compare Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Washington medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Laura Shook's specialty?
Laura Shook specializes in Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program and practices in Seattle, Washington.
How much does Laura Shook prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Laura Shook wrote 98 Medicare Part D claims totaling $2K in drug costs for 69 beneficiaries.
What is Laura Shook's Medicare quality score?
Laura Shook has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 91.6/100 (Quality: 85.1). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Laura Shook located?
Laura Shook is located at HARBORVIEW MEDICAL CENTER, Seattle, WA, 98104. Phone: (206) 744-8334.
What is Laura Shook's NPI number?
Laura Shook's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1982159711, issued on 08/22/2016.
Does Laura Shook prescribe opioids?
Yes, Laura Shook had 11 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 11.2%.
How many Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program providers are there in the US?
There are 331,761 Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program providers across 55 states in the US. The average Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program provider writes 459 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Laura Shook prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Laura Shook's most frequently prescribed drugs include Cephalexin. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Laura Shook accept Medicare?
Laura Shook appears in CMS Medicare data with 98 Part D claims and 69 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Laura Shook's credentials?
Laura Shook's NPI is 1982159711. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.