2026 NPPES data Nuclear Cardiology Physician NPI 1851329411 MD
Verify on CMS →

Liliya Yanovskaya, MD

Nuclear Cardiology Physician in Framingham, Massachusetts.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 374 in Nuclear Cardiology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
5K
Medicare Part D claims · 377 beneficiaries · Nuclear Cardiology Physician avg: 4K
Generic prescribing
87%
generic claims · 12% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
93.7/100
▲ 11 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Liliya Yanovskaya, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 93.7/100 - above the 83.1 national average - and filed 5,105 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

93.7/100
MIPS score · +11 vs avg
5K
Part D claims, 2023
87%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Liliya Yanovskaya, MD's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

94 Top 29% higher than 71% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Liliya Yanovskaya, MD sits

This provider among nuclear cardiology physician peers

Across the 162 nuclear cardiology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Liliya Yanovskaya, MD writes more Part D claims than 67% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 69% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Liliya Yanovskaya, MD-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 69
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one nuclear cardiology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Liliya Yanovskaya, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Liliya Yanovskaya, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Liliya Yanovskaya, MD?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/30/2006

NPI 1851329411

Primary specialty

Nuclear Cardiology Physician

Rare

374 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

5,105 27% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 4,019

MIPS final score

93.7/100 10.6 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Massachusetts

How Nuclear Cardiology Physician compares to other specialties among Massachusetts providers

Massachusetts providers
Mental Health Counselor - 8.3%Mental Health Counselor8.3%Clinical Social Worker - 7.8%Clinical Social Worker7.8%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 6.2%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program6.2%Behavior Technician - 4.9%Behavior Technician4.9%Counselor - 4.3%Counselor4.3%Internal Medicine Physician - 3.7%Internal Medicine Physician3.7%Nuclear Cardiology Physician - 0%Nuclear Cardiology Physician0%
Largest specialties in Massachusetts (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Liliya Yanovskaya, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Nuclear Cardiology Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
93.7/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Nuclear Cardiology Physician) - 93.7/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%93.7%
MIPS final score (Nuclear Cardiology Physician) - 93.7/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Liliya Yanovskaya, MD appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Nuclear Cardiology Physician provider holding MD credentials at 1101 WORCESTER RD STE 100, Framingham, MA, 01701, with a listed phone of (508) 202-1000. NPI 1851329411 was issued on 06/30/2006.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 5,105 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 377 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $587K in drug spend, split 12% brand-name and 87% generic by claim count. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 93.7/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 77.8), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Nuclear Cardiology Physician is a narrow specialty nationwide, with 374 enrolled providers across 37 states and an average of 4,019 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

1101 WORCESTER RD STE 100
Framingham, MA 01701

Provider Details

NPI 1851329411
Specialty Nuclear Cardiology Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Female
NPI Issued 06/30/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

93.7128
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
77.7931
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

License & disciplinary context - Massachusetts BORIM 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~38K Massachusetts medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Liliya Yanovskaya, MD. To verify Liliya Yanovskaya, MD's current license status, search the BORIM public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

80
Total board actions, Massachusetts 2023
Across 78 cases
2.11
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Massachusetts statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
29 cases

BORIM publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Massachusetts disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Liliya Yanovskaya, MD - brand share 12.0%
Nuclear Cardiology Physician average

12% brand-name claims vs 87% generic, on 5,105 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

5,105
Total Claims
$587K
Total Drug Cost
377
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
11,871
Total Day Supply
350,008
Brand vs Generic
12% brand / 87% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$433K
Generic Drug Cost
$152K
Antibiotic Claims
117

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
78.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.20
Gender Split
65% female / 35% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Liliya Yanovskaya, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Amlodipine Besylate
345
Atorvastatin Calcium
289
Metformin Hcl
204
Levothyroxine Sodium
196
Metoprolol Succinate
147
Rosuvastatin Calcium
122
Losartan Potassium
116
Lisinopril
101
Simvastatin
100
Hydrochlorothiazide
99

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Nuclear Cardiology Physician Overview

How Liliya Yanovskaya, MD fits within the Nuclear Cardiology Physician landscape nationally.

374
Nuclear Cardiology Physician Providers in US
37
States with Nuclear Cardiology Physician
4,019
Avg Claims per Provider

Liliya Yanovskaya, MD's 5,105 claims are above the specialty average of 4,019.

Nearby Nuclear Cardiology Physician Providers in Massachusetts

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Massachusetts, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Yanovskaya.

Compare Nuclear Cardiology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Massachusetts medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Nuclear Cardiology Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Liliya Yanovskaya, MD's specialty?
Liliya Yanovskaya, MD specializes in Nuclear Cardiology Physician and practices in Framingham, Massachusetts. Credentials: MD.
How much does Liliya Yanovskaya, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Liliya Yanovskaya, MD wrote 5,105 Medicare Part D claims totaling $587K in drug costs for 377 beneficiaries.
What is Liliya Yanovskaya, MD's Medicare quality score?
Liliya Yanovskaya, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 93.7/100 (Quality: 77.8). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Liliya Yanovskaya, MD located?
Liliya Yanovskaya, MD is located at 1101 WORCESTER RD STE 100, Framingham, MA, 01701. Phone: (508) 202-1000.
What is Liliya Yanovskaya, MD's NPI number?
Liliya Yanovskaya, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1851329411, issued on 06/30/2006.
Does Liliya Yanovskaya, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Liliya Yanovskaya, MD's prescribing is 12% brand-name and 87% generic drugs by claim count, with $433K in brand drug costs.
How many Nuclear Cardiology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 374 Nuclear Cardiology Physician providers across 37 states in the US. The average Nuclear Cardiology Physician provider writes 4,019 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Liliya Yanovskaya, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Liliya Yanovskaya, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Amlodipine Besylate, Atorvastatin Calcium, Metformin Hcl. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Liliya Yanovskaya, MD accept Medicare?
Liliya Yanovskaya, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 5,105 Part D claims and 377 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Liliya Yanovskaya, MD's credentials?
Liliya Yanovskaya, MD's NPI is 1851329411 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.