2026 NPPES data Advanced Practice Midwife NPI 1336520709 CNM
Verify on CMS →

Linda Bakker, CNM

Advanced Practice Midwife in Chattanooga, Tennessee.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 10,937 in Advanced Practice Midwife, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
63
Medicare Part D claims · 23 beneficiaries · Advanced Practice Midwife avg: 99
MIPS score
96.2/100
▲ 13 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$14.19
1 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Linda Bakker, CNM reported a CMS MIPS final score of 96.2/100 - above the 83.1 national average - and filed 63 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

96.2/100
MIPS score · +13 vs avg
63
Part D claims, 2023
$14.19
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Linda Bakker, CNM's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

96 Top 17% higher than 83% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Linda Bakker, CNM sits

This provider among advanced practice midwife peers

Across the 572 advanced practice midwife providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Linda Bakker, CNM writes more Part D claims than 74% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 86% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Linda Bakker, CNM-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 74 · MIPS quality, percentile: 86
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one advanced practice midwife peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Linda Bakker, CNM. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Linda Bakker, CNM?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/11/2015

NPI 1336520709

Primary specialty

Advanced Practice Midwife

Mid-sized

10,937 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

63 36% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 99

MIPS final score

96.2/100 13.1 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Tennessee

How Advanced Practice Midwife compares to other specialties among Tennessee providers

Tennessee providers
Family Nurse Practitioner - 6.4%Family Nurse Practitioner6.4%Pharmacist - 5.9%Pharmacist5.9%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 4.6%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program4.6%Physical Therapist - 4.2%Physical Therapist4.2%Behavior Technician - 4.2%Behavior Technician4.2%Registered Nurse - 3.9%Registered Nurse3.9%Advanced Practice Midwife - 0.2%Advanced Practice Midwife0.2%
Largest specialties in Tennessee (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Linda Bakker, CNM's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Advanced Practice Midwife national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
96.2/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Advanced Practice Midwife) - 96.2/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%96.2%
MIPS final score (Advanced Practice Midwife) - 96.2/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Linda Bakker, CNM appears in the CMS NPPES registry as an Advanced Practice Midwife provider holding CNM credentials at 251 N LYERLY ST, Chattanooga, TN, 37404, with a listed phone of (423) 648-7770. NPI 1336520709 was issued on 06/11/2015.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 63 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 23 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $3K in drug spend. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 96.2/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 85.2), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Advanced Practice Midwife is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 10,937 enrolled providers across 55 states and an average of 99 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

251 N LYERLY ST
Chattanooga, TN 37404

Provider Details

NPI 1336520709
Specialty Advanced Practice Midwife
Credentials CNM
Gender Female
NPI Issued 06/11/2015

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

96.1922
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
85.2035
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Linda Bakker, CNM bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Chattanooga Hamilton County Hospital Authority
Chattanooga, TN

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Linda Bakker, CNM. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$14

Largest payer

SHIELD THERAPEUTICS INC

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

63
Total Claims
$3K
Total Drug Cost
23
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
81
Total Day Supply
2,007
Generic Drug Cost
$1K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
56.9 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.55
Gender Split
100% female / 0% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Estradiol
15

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Advanced Practice Midwife Overview

How Linda Bakker, CNM fits within the Advanced Practice Midwife landscape nationally.

10,937
Advanced Practice Midwife Providers in US
55
States with Advanced Practice Midwife
99
Avg Claims per Provider

Linda Bakker, CNM's 63 claims are below the specialty average of 99.

Nearby Advanced Practice Midwife Providers in Tennessee

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Tennessee, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Bakker.

Compare Advanced Practice Midwife nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Tennessee medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Advanced Practice Midwife peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Linda Bakker, CNM's specialty?
Linda Bakker, CNM specializes in Advanced Practice Midwife and practices in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Credentials: CNM.
How much does Linda Bakker, CNM prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Linda Bakker, CNM wrote 63 Medicare Part D claims totaling $3K in drug costs for 23 beneficiaries.
What is Linda Bakker, CNM's Medicare quality score?
Linda Bakker, CNM has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 96.2/100 (Quality: 85.2). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Linda Bakker, CNM located?
Linda Bakker, CNM is located at 251 N LYERLY ST, Chattanooga, TN, 37404. Phone: (423) 648-7770.
What is Linda Bakker, CNM's NPI number?
Linda Bakker, CNM's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1336520709, issued on 06/11/2015.
How many Advanced Practice Midwife providers are there in the US?
There are 10,937 Advanced Practice Midwife providers across 55 states in the US. The average Advanced Practice Midwife provider writes 99 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Linda Bakker, CNM prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Linda Bakker, CNM's most frequently prescribed drugs include Estradiol. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Linda Bakker, CNM accept Medicare?
Linda Bakker, CNM appears in CMS Medicare data with 63 Part D claims and 23 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Linda Bakker, CNM's credentials?
Linda Bakker, CNM's NPI is 1336520709 with credentials CNM. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.