PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Women's Health Nurse Practitioner NPI 1942262688 ARNP
Verify on CMS →

Lori Schumann, ARNP

Women's Health Nurse Practitioner in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 9,754 in Women's Health Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 341 beneficiaries · Women's Health Nurse Practitioner avg: 269
MIPS score
75.5/100
▼ 8 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$240.66
11 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Lori Schumann, ARNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 75.5/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 2,268 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

75.5/100
MIPS score · -8 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2024
$240.66
industry payments (Sunshine Act)
≥15th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Lori Schumann, ARNP

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1942262688), first enumerated 04/06/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 2,268 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 75.5/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $240.66 in reported industry payments (11 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1942262688 · Women's Health Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-MID · MIPS-BELOW · RX-MID · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1942262688
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-MID 10K Women's Health
  • MIPS-BELOW 75.5/100
  • RX-MID 2,268
  • BOOK-THIN 113 in Iowa
  • PHOTO-FINISH Samantha Silverman,… · ±0.1

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Lori Schumann, ARNP's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

76 ≥ 15th percentile 15% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Lori Schumann, ARNP sits

This provider among women's health nurse practitioner peers

Across the 795 women's health nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Lori Schumann, ARNP writes more Part D claims than 97% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 12% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Lori Schumann, ARNP, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one women's health nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Lori Schumann, ARNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Lori Schumann, ARNP?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 04/06/2006

NPI 1942262688

Primary specialty

Women's Health Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

9,754 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

2,268 8× vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 269

MIPS final score

75.5/100 8 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Iowa

How Women's Health Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Iowa providers

Iowa providers
Pharmacist6.5%Physical Therapist5.4%Mental Health Counselor5%Family Medicine Physician4.7%Clinical Social Worker4.2%Chiropractor4.1%Women's Health Nurse Practit…0.2%
Largest specialties in Iowa (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Lori Schumann, ARNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Women's Health Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
75.5/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%75.5%
MIPS final score (Women's Health Nurse Practitioner) - 75.5/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

202 10TH ST SE
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
(319) 398-1545

Provider Details

NPI 1942262688
Specialty Women's Health Nurse Practitioner
Credentials ARNP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 04/06/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

75.5284
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
59.3244
Quality
93
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Lori Schumann, ARNP bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Physicians Clinic OF Iowa PC
Cedar Rapids, IA

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Lori Schumann, ARNP. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$241

Largest payer

ARGENX US, INC.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

2,268
Total Claims
$531K
Total Drug Cost
341
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
3,603.8
Total Day Supply
105,253
Generic Drug Cost
$64K
Opioid Claims
44 (1.9% rate)

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
65.5 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.33
Gender Split
60% female / 40% male
Age Distribution
<65: 115, 65-74: 134, 75-84: 81, 85+: 11

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Lori Schumann, ARNP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Lamotrigine
 163
Levetiracetam
 148
Nurtec Odt
Rimegepant Sulfate
112
Topiramate
 100
Ropinirole Hcl
 91
Gabapentin
 86
Montelukast Sodium
 84
Divalproex Sodium Er
Divalproex Sodium
81
Propranolol Hcl Er
Propranolol Hcl
75
Aimovig Autoinjector
Erenumab-Aooe
72

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Women's Health Nurse Practitioner in IA → All providers in Iowa → Compare specialties →

Women's Health Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Lori Schumann, ARNP fits within the Women's Health Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

9,754
Women's Health Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
55
States with Women's Health Nurse Practitioner
269
Avg Claims per Provider

Lori Schumann, ARNP's 2,268 claims are above the specialty average of 269.

Nationwide Women's Health Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Schumann, both outside Iowa so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (75.5 here).

Samantha Silverman 75.4 IL Margaret Bisceglia 75.3 PA Sandra Nagy 75.8 NJ Maria Petruzzelli 75.8 NJ

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Kathy Hartley Tallahassee, FL Margaret Bisceglia Mars, PA Melanie Mead Tulsa, OK Becky Douglas Dallas, TX

Nearby Women's Health Nurse Practitioner Providers in Iowa

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Iowa, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Schumann.

One of 113 Women's Health Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Iowa, 5 are shown here.

Nancy Agnew
ARNP
Davenport, IA
Billy Alderton
ARNP
Keokuk, IA
Kimberly Alton
APN
West Des Moines, IA
Stacey Arthur
APRN
Hampton, IA
Sue Ashton
ARNP
Marshalltown, IA

Compare Women's Health Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Lori Schumann, ARNP's specialty? ▼
Lori Schumann, ARNP specializes in Women's Health Nurse Practitioner and practices in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Credentials: ARNP.
How much does Lori Schumann, ARNP prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Lori Schumann, ARNP wrote 2,268 Medicare Part D claims totaling $531K in drug costs for 341 beneficiaries.
What is Lori Schumann, ARNP's Medicare quality score? ▼
Lori Schumann, ARNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 75.5/100 (Quality: 59.3). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Lori Schumann, ARNP located? ▼
Lori Schumann, ARNP is located at 202 10TH ST SE, Cedar Rapids, IA, 52403. Phone: (319) 398-1545.
What is Lori Schumann, ARNP's NPI number? ▼
Lori Schumann, ARNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1942262688, issued on 04/06/2006.
Does Lori Schumann, ARNP prescribe opioids? ▼
Yes, Lori Schumann, ARNP had 44 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 1.9%.
How many Women's Health Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 9,754 Women's Health Nurse Practitioner providers across 55 states in the US. The average Women's Health Nurse Practitioner provider writes 269 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Lori Schumann, ARNP prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Lori Schumann, ARNP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Lamotrigine, Levetiracetam, Nurtec Odt. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Lori Schumann, ARNP accept Medicare? ▼
Lori Schumann, ARNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 2,268 Part D claims and 341 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Lori Schumann, ARNP's credentials? ▼
Lori Schumann, ARNP's NPI is 1942262688 with credentials ARNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.