PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician NPI 1710991740 M.D.
Verify on CMS →

Mahe Nadeem, M.D.

Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician in Plano, Texas.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 1,792 in Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
856
Medicare Part D claims · 203 beneficiaries · Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician avg: 5K
MIPS score
72.7/100
▼ 11 pts below national avg 83.5 · Mid-tier
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Mahe Nadeem, M.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 72.7/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 856 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

72.7/100
MIPS score · -11 vs avg
856
Part D claims, 2024
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)
≥10th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Mahe Nadeem, M.D.

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1710991740), first enumerated 07/27/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 856 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 72.7/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    Texas statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Mahe Nadeem, M.D.'s individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: TMB annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1710991740 · Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-LOW · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1710991740
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-NARROW 1,792
  • MIPS-LOW 72.7/100
  • RX-LIGHT 856
  • BOOK-THIN 146 in Texas
  • PHOTO-FINISH James Richardson · ±0.2

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Mahe Nadeem, M.D.'s MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

73 ≥ 10th percentile 10% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Mahe Nadeem, M.D. sits

This provider among geriatric medicine (family medicine) physician peers

Across the 278 geriatric medicine (family medicine) physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Mahe Nadeem, M.D. writes more Part D claims than 26% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 13% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Mahe Nadeem, M.D., Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 26 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one geriatric medicine (family medicine) physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Mahe Nadeem, M.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

✓
Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Mahe Nadeem, M.D. practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Mahe Nadeem, M.D.?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/27/2006

NPI 1710991740

Primary specialty

Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician

Niche

1,792 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

856 83% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 4,917

MIPS final score

72.7/100 10.8 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Texas

How Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician compares to other specialties among Texas providers

Texas providers
Behavior Technician6%Student in an Organized Heal…5.3%Family Nurse Practitioner4.5%Professional Counselor4.4%Pharmacist4.3%Speech-Language Pathologist3.9%Geriatric Medicine (Family M…0%
Largest specialties in Texas (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Mahe Nadeem, M.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
72.7/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%72.7%
MIPS final score (Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician) - 72.7/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

2800 W 15TH ST
Plano, TX 75075
(972) 378-6908

Provider Details

NPI 1710991740
Specialty Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician
Credentials M.D.
Gender Female
NPI Issued 07/27/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

72.7294
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
100
Quality
89.054
Cost

Reporting: Individual

License & disciplinary context - Texas TMB 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~77K Texas medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Mahe Nadeem, M.D.. To verify Mahe Nadeem, M.D.'s current license status, search the TMB public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

344
Total board actions, Texas 2023
Across 334 cases
4.47
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Texas statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
94 cases

TMB publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Texas disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

856
Total Claims
$34K
Total Drug Cost
203
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
870.333
Total Day Supply
23,034
Generic Drug Cost
$8K
Opioid Claims
40 (4.7% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
19

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
76.5 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.96
Gender Split
58% female / 42% male
Age Distribution
<65: 23, 65-74: 55, 75-84: 81, 85+: 44

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Mahe Nadeem, M.D. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Pantoprazole Sodium
 47
Atorvastatin Calcium
 43
Amlodipine Besylate
 28
Eliquis
Apixaban
28
Levothyroxine Sodium
 28
Losartan Potassium
 26
Metoprolol Succinate
 26
Potassium Chloride
 21
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
20
Tamsulosin Hcl
 19

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician in TX → All providers in Texas → Compare specialties →

Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician Overview

How Mahe Nadeem, M.D. fits within the Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician landscape nationally.

1,792
Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician Providers in US
52
States with Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician
4,917
Avg Claims per Provider

Mahe Nadeem, M.D.'s 856 claims are below the specialty average of 4,917.

Nationwide Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Nadeem, both outside Texas so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (72.7 here).

James Richardson 72.9 MD Laura Morton 73.2 KY Frances Dechurch 73.2 NC Padam Neopane 73.3 NJ

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Gustavo Grana The Villages, FL Larisa Golub Flemington, NJ Melinda Ratini Bristol, PA Dieter Eppel Port Orchard, WA

Nearby Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician Providers in Texas

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Texas, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Nadeem.

One of 146 Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician providers enrolled in Texas, 5 are shown here.

Dr. Ahmad Abazid
M.D
Richardson, TX
Dr. Shekher Adolph
M.D.
San Antonio, TX
Dr. Raul Aguilar
M.D.
Lackland Afb, TX
Dr. Asma Ahmad
MD
Cypress, TX
Dr. Saamia Ahmed
M.D.
Irving, TX

Compare Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Mahe Nadeem, M.D.'s specialty? ▼
Mahe Nadeem, M.D. specializes in Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician and practices in Plano, Texas. Credentials: M.D..
How much does Mahe Nadeem, M.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Mahe Nadeem, M.D. wrote 856 Medicare Part D claims totaling $34K in drug costs for 203 beneficiaries.
What is Mahe Nadeem, M.D.'s Medicare quality score? ▼
Mahe Nadeem, M.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 72.7/100 (Quality: 100, Cost: 89.1). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Mahe Nadeem, M.D. located? ▼
Mahe Nadeem, M.D. is located at 2800 W 15TH ST, Plano, TX, 75075. Phone: (972) 378-6908.
What is Mahe Nadeem, M.D.'s NPI number? ▼
Mahe Nadeem, M.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1710991740, issued on 07/27/2006.
Does Mahe Nadeem, M.D. prescribe opioids? ▼
Yes, Mahe Nadeem, M.D. had 40 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 4.7%.
How many Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 1,792 Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician providers across 52 states in the US. The average Geriatric Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician provider writes 4,917 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Mahe Nadeem, M.D. prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Mahe Nadeem, M.D.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Pantoprazole Sodium, Atorvastatin Calcium, Amlodipine Besylate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Mahe Nadeem, M.D. accept Medicare? ▼
Mahe Nadeem, M.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 856 Part D claims and 203 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Mahe Nadeem, M.D.'s credentials? ▼
Mahe Nadeem, M.D.'s NPI is 1710991740 with credentials M.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.