2026 NPPES data Nurse Practitioner NPI 1992891774 APRN
Verify on CMS →

Maria Daigneault, APRN

Nurse Practitioner in Hartford, Connecticut.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 89,808 in Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 276 beneficiaries · Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
11%
generic claims · 68% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
86.4/100
▲ 3 pts above national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$636.26
24 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Maria Daigneault, APRN reported a CMS MIPS final score of 86.4/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 2,343 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

86.4/100
MIPS score · +3 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2024
11%
generic prescribing
$636.26
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Maria Daigneault, APRN

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1992891774), first enumerated 10/05/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 2,343 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 86.4/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $636.26 in reported industry payments (24 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1992891774 · Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-INLINE · RX-MID · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1992891774
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-MEGA 90K Nurse Practitioner
  • MIPS-INLINE 86.4/100
  • RX-MID 2,343
  • BOOK-LIGHT 1,006 in Connecticut
  • PHOTO-FINISH Erica Boland, APRN · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Maria Daigneault, APRN's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

86 ≥ 49th percentile 49% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Maria Daigneault, APRN sits

This provider among nurse practitioner peers

Across the 13,205 nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Maria Daigneault, APRN writes more Part D claims than 86% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 52% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Maria Daigneault, APRN, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 86 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Maria Daigneault, APRN. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Maria Daigneault, APRN?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 10/05/2006

NPI 1992891774

Primary specialty

Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

89,808 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

2,343 105% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,144

MIPS final score

86.4/100 2.9 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Connecticut

How Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Connecticut providers

Connecticut providers
Clinical Social Worker8.4%Student in an Organized Heal…7.9%Physical Therapist4.2%Pharmacist3.9%Internal Medicine Physician3.4%Mental Health Counselor3.2%Nurse Practitioner1.2%
Largest specialties in Connecticut (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Maria Daigneault, APRN's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
86.4/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%86.4%
MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) - 86.4/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

80 SEYMOUR STREET
Hartford, CT 06102

Provider Details

NPI 1992891774
Specialty Nurse Practitioner
Credentials APRN
Gender Female
NPI Issued 10/05/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

86.4127
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
81.9936
Quality
43.0396
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Maria Daigneault, APRN bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Hartford Hospital
★★★★☆ 4/5
Hartford, CT
Acute Care Hospitals
CMS CCN: 070025

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Maria Daigneault, APRN. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$636

Largest payer

Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Brand-heavy

Maria Daigneault, APRN - brand share 68.0%
Nurse Practitioner average

68% brand-name claims vs 11% generic, on 2,343 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

2,343
Total Claims
$1.3M
Total Drug Cost
276
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
4,247.9
Total Day Supply
124,446
Brand vs Generic
68% brand / 11% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$1.2M
Generic Drug Cost
$5K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
68.4 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.80
Gender Split
47% female / 53% male
Age Distribution
<65: 77, 65-74: 126, 75-84: 62, 85+: 11

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Maria Daigneault, APRN prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Ozempic
Semaglutide
325
Nano 2nd Gen Pen Needle
Pen Needle, Diabetic
199
Mounjaro
Tirzepatide
197
Lantus Solostar
Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog
149
Insulin Lispro Kwikpen U-100
Insulin Lispro
103
Tresiba Flextouch U-100
Insulin Degludec
100
Metformin Hcl Er
Metformin Hcl
89
Ultra-Fine Nano Pen Needle
Pen Needle, Diabetic
80
Tradjenta
Linagliptin
75
Novolog Flexpen
Insulin Aspart
74

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Maria Daigneault, APRN fits within the Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

89,808
Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Nurse Practitioner
1,144
Avg Claims per Provider

Maria Daigneault, APRN's 2,343 claims are above the specialty average of 1,144.

Nationwide Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Daigneault, both outside Connecticut so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (86.4 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Nurse Practitioner Providers in Connecticut

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Connecticut, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Daigneault.

One of 1,006 Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Connecticut, 5 are shown here.

Compare Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Maria Daigneault, APRN's specialty?
Maria Daigneault, APRN specializes in Nurse Practitioner and practices in Hartford, Connecticut. Credentials: APRN.
How much does Maria Daigneault, APRN prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Maria Daigneault, APRN wrote 2,343 Medicare Part D claims totaling $1.3M in drug costs for 276 beneficiaries.
What is Maria Daigneault, APRN's Medicare quality score?
Maria Daigneault, APRN has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 86.4/100 (Quality: 82, Cost: 43). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Maria Daigneault, APRN located?
Maria Daigneault, APRN is located at 80 SEYMOUR STREET, Hartford, CT, 06102. Phone: (860) 545-3526.
What is Maria Daigneault, APRN's NPI number?
Maria Daigneault, APRN's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1992891774, issued on 10/05/2006.
Does Maria Daigneault, APRN prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Maria Daigneault, APRN's prescribing is 68% brand-name and 11% generic drugs by claim count, with $1.2M in brand drug costs.
How many Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 89,808 Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,144 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Maria Daigneault, APRN prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Maria Daigneault, APRN's most frequently prescribed drugs include Ozempic, Nano 2nd Gen Pen Needle, Mounjaro. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Maria Daigneault, APRN accept Medicare?
Maria Daigneault, APRN appears in CMS Medicare data with 2,343 Part D claims and 276 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Maria Daigneault, APRN's credentials?
Maria Daigneault, APRN's NPI is 1992891774 with credentials APRN. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.