2026 NPPES data Medical Physician Assistant NPI 1417935750 PA-C
Verify on CMS →

Mark Altman, PA-C

Medical Physician Assistant in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 40,694 in Medical Physician Assistant, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
229
Medicare Part D claims · 171 beneficiaries · Medical Physician Assistant avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
94%
generic claims · 6% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
96.3/100
▲ 13 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional

What the federal data shows

Mark Altman, PA-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 96.3/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 229 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

96.3/100
MIPS score · +13 vs avg
229
Part D claims, 2024
94%
generic prescribing
≥82nd
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Mark Altman, PA-C

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1417935750), first enumerated 01/06/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 229 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 96.3/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    Michigan statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Mark Altman, PA-C's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: MI-BOM annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1417935750 · Medical Physician Assistant

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-MID · MIPS-ELITE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1417935750
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-MID 41K Medical Physician
  • MIPS-ELITE 96.3/100
  • RX-LIGHT 229
  • BOOK-LIGHT 1,285 in Michigan
  • PHOTO-FINISH Braden Iveson, PA-C · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Mark Altman, PA-C's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

96 ≥ 82nd percentile 82% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Mark Altman, PA-C sits

This provider among medical physician assistant peers

Across the 7,147 medical physician assistant providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Mark Altman, PA-C writes more Part D claims than 40% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 83% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Mark Altman, PA-C, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one medical physician assistant peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Mark Altman, PA-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Mark Altman, PA-C?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 01/06/2006

NPI 1417935750

Primary specialty

Medical Physician Assistant

Mid-sized

40,694 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

229 80% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,139

MIPS final score

96.3/100 12.8 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Michigan

How Medical Physician Assistant compares to other specialties among Michigan providers

Michigan providers
Behavior Technician22.2%Clinical Social Worker5.7%Student in an Organized Heal…3.7%Social Worker3.3%Physical Therapist3.3%Pharmacist2.9%Medical Physician Assistant0.4%
Largest specialties in Michigan (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Mark Altman, PA-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Medical Physician Assistant national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
96.3/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%96.3%
MIPS final score (Medical Physician Assistant) - 96.3/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

100 MICHIGAN ST NE
Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Provider Details

NPI 1417935750
Specialty Medical Physician Assistant
Credentials PA-C
Gender Male
NPI Issued 01/06/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

96.2712
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
87.8989
Quality

Reporting: Group practice

License & disciplinary context - Michigan MI-BOM 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~41K Michigan medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Mark Altman, PA-C. To verify Mark Altman, PA-C's current license status, search the MI-BOM public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

123
Total board actions, Michigan 2023
Across 120 cases
3.00
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Michigan statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
44 cases

MI-BOM publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Michigan disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Mark Altman, PA-C - brand share 6.0%
Medical Physician Assistant average

6% brand-name claims vs 94% generic, on 229 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

229
Total Claims
$4K
Total Drug Cost
171
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
234.133
Total Day Supply
2,216
Brand vs Generic
6% brand / 94% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$2K
Generic Drug Cost
$2K
Antibiotic Claims
90

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
69.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.47
Gender Split
59% female / 41% male
Age Distribution
<65: 45, 65-74: 65, 75-84: 43, 85+: 18

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Mark Altman, PA-C prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Cefuroxime
Cefuroxime Axetil
29
Cephalexin
27
Ondansetron Odt
Ondansetron
25
Prednisone
24
Naproxen
17
Methocarbamol
13

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Medical Physician Assistant Overview

How Mark Altman, PA-C fits within the Medical Physician Assistant landscape nationally.

40,694
Medical Physician Assistant Providers in US
55
States with Medical Physician Assistant
1,139
Avg Claims per Provider

Mark Altman, PA-C's 229 claims are below the specialty average of 1,139.

Nationwide Medical Physician Assistant peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Altman, both outside Michigan so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (96.3 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Medical Physician Assistant Providers in Michigan

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Michigan, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Altman.

One of 1,285 Medical Physician Assistant providers enrolled in Michigan, 5 are shown here.

Compare Medical Physician Assistant nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Mark Altman, PA-C's specialty?
Mark Altman, PA-C specializes in Medical Physician Assistant and practices in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Credentials: PA-C.
How much does Mark Altman, PA-C prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Mark Altman, PA-C wrote 229 Medicare Part D claims totaling $4K in drug costs for 171 beneficiaries.
What is Mark Altman, PA-C's Medicare quality score?
Mark Altman, PA-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 96.3/100 (Quality: 87.9). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Mark Altman, PA-C located?
Mark Altman, PA-C is located at 100 MICHIGAN ST NE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503. Phone: (616) 391-1680.
What is Mark Altman, PA-C's NPI number?
Mark Altman, PA-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1417935750, issued on 01/06/2006.
Does Mark Altman, PA-C prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Mark Altman, PA-C's prescribing is 6% brand-name and 94% generic drugs by claim count, with $2K in brand drug costs.
How many Medical Physician Assistant providers are there in the US?
There are 40,694 Medical Physician Assistant providers across 55 states in the US. The average Medical Physician Assistant provider writes 1,139 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Mark Altman, PA-C prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Mark Altman, PA-C's most frequently prescribed drugs include Cefuroxime, Cephalexin, Ondansetron Odt. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Mark Altman, PA-C accept Medicare?
Mark Altman, PA-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 229 Part D claims and 171 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Mark Altman, PA-C's credentials?
Mark Altman, PA-C's NPI is 1417935750 with credentials PA-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.