2026 NPPES data Interventional Pain Medicine Physician NPI 1730150194 MD
Verify on CMS →

Mark Ellis, MD

Interventional Pain Medicine Physician in Athens, Georgia.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 1,528 in Interventional Pain Medicine Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
19K
Medicare Part D claims · 2K beneficiaries · Interventional Pain Medicine Physician avg: 2K
Generic prescribing
97%
generic claims · 3% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
92.4/100
▲ 9 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$48.93
2 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Mark Ellis, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 92.4/100 - above the 83.1 national average - and filed 19,390 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

92.4/100
MIPS score · +9 vs avg
19K
Part D claims, 2023
97%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Mark Ellis, MD's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

92 Top 32% higher than 68% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Mark Ellis, MD sits

This provider among interventional pain medicine physician peers

Across the 546 interventional pain medicine physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Mark Ellis, MD writes more Part D claims than 98% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 80% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Mark Ellis, MD-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one interventional pain medicine physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Mark Ellis, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Mark Ellis, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Mark Ellis, MD?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 02/01/2006

NPI 1730150194

Primary specialty

Interventional Pain Medicine Physician

Niche

1,528 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

19,390 vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 2,197

MIPS final score

92.4/100 9.3 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Georgia

How Interventional Pain Medicine Physician compares to other specialties among Georgia providers

Georgia providers
Behavior Technician - 7.3%Behavior Technician7.3%Pharmacist - 5.1%Pharmacist5.1%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5%Family Nurse Practitioner - 4.8%Family Nurse Practitioner4.8%Physical Therapist - 3.9%Physical Therapist3.9%Professional Counselor - 3.6%Professional Counselor3.6%Interventional Pain Medicine Physician - 0.1%Interventional Pain Medicine Physician0.1%
Largest specialties in Georgia (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Mark Ellis, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Interventional Pain Medicine Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
92.4/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Interventional Pain Medicine Physician) - 92.4/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%92.4%
MIPS final score (Interventional Pain Medicine Physician) - 92.4/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Mark Ellis, MD appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Interventional Pain Medicine Physician provider holding MD credentials at 1765 OLD WEST BROAD ST, Athens, GA, 30606, with a listed phone of (706) 208-0451. NPI 1730150194 was issued on 02/01/2006.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 19,390 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 1,521 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $991K in drug spend, split 3% brand-name and 97% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 89.6%. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 92.4/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 72.9), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Interventional Pain Medicine Physician is a narrow specialty nationwide, with 1,528 enrolled providers across 53 states and an average of 2,197 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

1765 OLD WEST BROAD ST
Athens, GA 30606

Provider Details

NPI 1730150194
Specialty Interventional Pain Medicine Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 02/01/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

92.3583
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
72.8913
Quality
99
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Individual

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Mark Ellis, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$49

Largest payer

ABBVIE INC.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Mark Ellis, MD - brand share 3.0%
Interventional Pain Medicine Physician average

3% brand-name claims vs 97% generic, on 19,390 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

19,390
Total Claims
$991K
Total Drug Cost
1,521
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
19,524
Total Day Supply
534,611
Brand vs Generic
3% brand / 97% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$234K
Generic Drug Cost
$757K
Opioid Claims
17,371 (89.6% rate)

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
66.3 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.82
Gender Split
61% female / 39% male
Age Distribution
<65: 584, 65-74: 615, 75-84: 280, 85+: 42

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Mark Ellis, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
5,823
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen
Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen
5,387
Oxycodone Hcl
2,646
Morphine Sulfate Er
Morphine Sulfate
1,011
Hydromorphone Hcl
809
Fentanyl
374
Methadone Hcl
345
Gabapentin
309
Pregabalin
232
Morphine Sulfate
184

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Interventional Pain Medicine Physician Overview

How Mark Ellis, MD fits within the Interventional Pain Medicine Physician landscape nationally.

1,528
Interventional Pain Medicine Physician Providers in US
53
States with Interventional Pain Medicine Physician
2,197
Avg Claims per Provider

Mark Ellis, MD's 19,390 claims are above the specialty average of 2,197.

Nearby Interventional Pain Medicine Physician Providers in Georgia

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Georgia, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Ellis.

Compare Interventional Pain Medicine Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Georgia medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Interventional Pain Medicine Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Mark Ellis, MD's specialty?
Mark Ellis, MD specializes in Interventional Pain Medicine Physician and practices in Athens, Georgia. Credentials: MD.
How much does Mark Ellis, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Mark Ellis, MD wrote 19,390 Medicare Part D claims totaling $991K in drug costs for 1,521 beneficiaries.
What is Mark Ellis, MD's Medicare quality score?
Mark Ellis, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 92.4/100 (Quality: 72.9). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Mark Ellis, MD located?
Mark Ellis, MD is located at 1765 OLD WEST BROAD ST, Athens, GA, 30606. Phone: (706) 208-0451.
What is Mark Ellis, MD's NPI number?
Mark Ellis, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1730150194, issued on 02/01/2006.
Does Mark Ellis, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Mark Ellis, MD's prescribing is 3% brand-name and 97% generic drugs by claim count, with $234K in brand drug costs.
Does Mark Ellis, MD prescribe opioids?
Yes, Mark Ellis, MD had 17,371 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 89.6%.
How many Interventional Pain Medicine Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 1,528 Interventional Pain Medicine Physician providers across 53 states in the US. The average Interventional Pain Medicine Physician provider writes 2,197 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Mark Ellis, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Mark Ellis, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen, Oxycodone-Acetaminophen, Oxycodone Hcl. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Mark Ellis, MD accept Medicare?
Mark Ellis, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 19,390 Part D claims and 1,521 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Mark Ellis, MD's credentials?
Mark Ellis, MD's NPI is 1730150194 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.