2026 NPPES data Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist NPI 1588616098 DPM
Verify on CMS →

Mark Hellmann, DPM

Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist in Harriman, Tennessee.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 1,074 in Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
790
Medicare Part D claims · 344 beneficiaries · Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist avg: 371
MIPS score
0/100
▼ 84 pts below national avg 83.5 · Penalty band
Industry payments
$19.67
1 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Mark Hellmann, DPM reported a CMS MIPS final score of 0/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 790 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

0/100
MIPS score · -83 vs avg
790
Part D claims, 2024
$19.67
industry payments (Sunshine Act)
≥0th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Mark Hellmann, DPM

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1588616098), first enumerated 05/16/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 790 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 0/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $19.67 in reported industry payments (1 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1588616098 · Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-LOW · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1588616098
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-NARROW 1,074
  • MIPS-LOW 0/100
  • RX-LIGHT 790
  • BOOK-THIN 13 in Tennessee
  • PHOTO-FINISH Melineh Aslanian · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Mark Hellmann, DPM's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

0 ≥ 0th percentile 0% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). This entry sits in this band. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Mark Hellmann, DPM sits

This provider among primary podiatric medicine podiatrist peers

Across the 206 primary podiatric medicine podiatrist providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Mark Hellmann, DPM writes more Part D claims than 91% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 0% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Mark Hellmann, DPM, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 91 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one primary podiatric medicine podiatrist peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Mark Hellmann, DPM. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Mark Hellmann, DPM?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 05/16/2006

NPI 1588616098

Primary specialty

Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist

Niche

1,074 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

790 113% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 371

MIPS final score

0/100 83.5 pts vs avg

Penalty band band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Tennessee

How Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist compares to other specialties among Tennessee providers

Tennessee providers
Family Nurse Practitioner6.4%Pharmacist5.8%Student in an Organized Heal…4.7%Behavior Technician4.5%Physical Therapist4.2%Registered Nurse3.9%Primary Podiatric Medicine P…0%
Largest specialties in Tennessee (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Mark Hellmann, DPM's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
0/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%0%
MIPS final score (Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist) - 0/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

1855 TANNER WAY STE 130
Harriman, TN 37748

Provider Details

NPI 1588616098
Specialty Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist
Credentials DPM
Gender Male
NPI Issued 05/16/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

0
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
0
Quality

Reporting: Individual

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Mark Hellmann, DPM. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$20

Largest payer

Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

790
Total Claims
$9K
Total Drug Cost
344
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
1,151
Total Day Supply
25,686
Generic Drug Cost
$8K
Opioid Claims
28 (3.5% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
235

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
71.5 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.65
Gender Split
53% female / 47% male
Age Distribution
<65: 55, 65-74: 157, 75-84: 107, 85+: 25

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Mark Hellmann, DPM prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Terbinafine Hcl
130
Allopurinol
88
Mupirocin
83
Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim
Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim
64
Cephalexin
55
Gabapentin
55
Doxycycline Hyclate
45
Ciclopirox
37
Methylprednisolone
32
Ammonium Lactate
26

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist Overview

How Mark Hellmann, DPM fits within the Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist landscape nationally.

1,074
Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist Providers in US
50
States with Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist
371
Avg Claims per Provider

Mark Hellmann, DPM's 790 claims are above the specialty average of 371.

Nationwide Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Hellmann, both outside Tennessee so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (0 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist Providers in Tennessee

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Tennessee, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Hellmann.

One of 13 Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist providers enrolled in Tennessee, 5 are shown here.

Compare Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Mark Hellmann, DPM's specialty?
Mark Hellmann, DPM specializes in Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist and practices in Harriman, Tennessee. Credentials: DPM.
How much does Mark Hellmann, DPM prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Mark Hellmann, DPM wrote 790 Medicare Part D claims totaling $9K in drug costs for 344 beneficiaries.
What is Mark Hellmann, DPM's Medicare quality score?
Mark Hellmann, DPM has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 0/100 (Quality: 0). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Mark Hellmann, DPM located?
Mark Hellmann, DPM is located at 1855 TANNER WAY STE 130, Harriman, TN, 37748. Phone: (865) 882-4944.
What is Mark Hellmann, DPM's NPI number?
Mark Hellmann, DPM's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1588616098, issued on 05/16/2006.
Does Mark Hellmann, DPM prescribe opioids?
Yes, Mark Hellmann, DPM had 28 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 3.5%.
How many Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist providers are there in the US?
There are 1,074 Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist providers across 50 states in the US. The average Primary Podiatric Medicine Podiatrist provider writes 371 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Mark Hellmann, DPM prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Mark Hellmann, DPM's most frequently prescribed drugs include Terbinafine Hcl, Allopurinol, Mupirocin. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Mark Hellmann, DPM accept Medicare?
Mark Hellmann, DPM appears in CMS Medicare data with 790 Part D claims and 344 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Mark Hellmann, DPM's credentials?
Mark Hellmann, DPM's NPI is 1588616098 with credentials DPM. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.