2026 NPPES data Surgical Oncology Physician NPI 1467482554 M.D.
Verify on CMS →

Mark Reeves, M.D.

Surgical Oncology Physician in Loma Linda, California.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 1,410 in Surgical Oncology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
22
Medicare Part D claims · 12 beneficiaries · Surgical Oncology Physician avg: 97
MIPS score
85.2/100
▲ 2 pts above national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$369.12
2 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Mark Reeves, M.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 85.2/100 - above the 83.1 national average - and filed 22 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

85.2/100
MIPS score · +2 vs avg
22
Part D claims, 2023
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Mark Reeves, M.D.'s MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

85 49th percentile higher than 49% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Mark Reeves, M.D. sits

This provider among surgical oncology physician peers

Across the 416 surgical oncology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Mark Reeves, M.D. writes more Part D claims than 19% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 47% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Mark Reeves, M.D.-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 19 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one surgical oncology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Mark Reeves, M.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Mark Reeves, M.D. practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Mark Reeves, M.D.?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/04/2006

NPI 1467482554

Primary specialty

Surgical Oncology Physician

Niche

1,410 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

22 77% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 97

MIPS final score

85.2/100 2.1 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in California

How Surgical Oncology Physician compares to other specialties among California providers

California providers
Behavior Technician - 17.3%Behavior Technician17.3%Marriage & Family Therapist - 5.5%Marriage & Family Therapist5.5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5%Mental Health Counselor - 3.9%Mental Health Counselor3.9%Pharmacist - 3.5%Pharmacist3.5%Clinical Social Worker - 3.1%Clinical Social Worker3.1%Surgical Oncology Physician - 0%Surgical Oncology Physician0%
Largest specialties in California (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Mark Reeves, M.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Surgical Oncology Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
85.2/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Surgical Oncology Physician) - 85.2/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%85.2%
MIPS final score (Surgical Oncology Physician) - 85.2/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Mark Reeves, M.D. appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Surgical Oncology Physician provider holding M.D. credentials at 11370 ANDERSON ST, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, with a listed phone of (909) 558-2822. NPI 1467482554 was issued on 07/04/2006.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 22 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 12 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $2K in drug spend. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 85.2/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 71.8, Cost 64.5), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Surgical Oncology Physician is a narrow specialty nationwide, with 1,410 enrolled providers across 50 states and an average of 97 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

11370 ANDERSON ST
Loma Linda, CA 92354

Provider Details

NPI 1467482554
Specialty Surgical Oncology Physician
Credentials M.D.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 07/04/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

85.186
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
71.8166
Quality
64.5435
Cost
82
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Mark Reeves, M.D. bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Faculty Physicians And Surgeons OF Llusm
Loma Linda, CA

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Mark Reeves, M.D.. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$369

Largest payer

W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - California MBC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~150K California medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Mark Reeves, M.D.. To verify Mark Reeves, M.D.'s current license status, search the MBC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

576
Total board actions, California 2023
Across 556 cases
3.84
Actions per 1,000 licensees
California statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
186 cases

MBC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the California disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

22
Total Claims
$2K
Total Drug Cost
12
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
26
Total Day Supply
481
Generic Drug Cost
$327

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
73.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
3.00

Surgical Oncology Physician Overview

How Mark Reeves, M.D. fits within the Surgical Oncology Physician landscape nationally.

1,410
Surgical Oncology Physician Providers in US
50
States with Surgical Oncology Physician
97
Avg Claims per Provider

Mark Reeves, M.D.'s 22 claims are below the specialty average of 97.

Nearby Surgical Oncology Physician Providers in California

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in California, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Reeves.

Compare Surgical Oncology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the California medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Surgical Oncology Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Mark Reeves, M.D.'s specialty?
Mark Reeves, M.D. specializes in Surgical Oncology Physician and practices in Loma Linda, California. Credentials: M.D..
How much does Mark Reeves, M.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Mark Reeves, M.D. wrote 22 Medicare Part D claims totaling $2K in drug costs for 12 beneficiaries.
What is Mark Reeves, M.D.'s Medicare quality score?
Mark Reeves, M.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 85.2/100 (Quality: 71.8, Cost: 64.5). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Mark Reeves, M.D. located?
Mark Reeves, M.D. is located at 11370 ANDERSON ST, Loma Linda, CA, 92354. Phone: (909) 558-2822.
What is Mark Reeves, M.D.'s NPI number?
Mark Reeves, M.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1467482554, issued on 07/04/2006.
How many Surgical Oncology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 1,410 Surgical Oncology Physician providers across 50 states in the US. The average Surgical Oncology Physician provider writes 97 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Mark Reeves, M.D. accept Medicare?
Mark Reeves, M.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 22 Part D claims and 12 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Mark Reeves, M.D.'s credentials?
Mark Reeves, M.D.'s NPI is 1467482554 with credentials M.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.